Redmond Care and Rehabilitation Center
Redmond, Washington · CCN 505181
37 surveys since 2010, 8 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 155
- Surveys
- 37
- Harm or worse
- 8
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 139
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- THE ENSIGN GROUP
- County
- King
- Medicare-certified since
- 1968
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 5
- Health inspection
- 4
- Staffing
- 4
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded fewer weighted findings than most of its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 26 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in Washington.
Last survey on record
Feb 13, 2026
269 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.66 | 3.97 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.98 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 26.2% | 45.8% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D2284.6% | E415.4% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6563×
Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
- F8123×
Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
- F6412×
Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
- F6772×
Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
- F6952×
Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Redmond Care and Rehabilitation Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Aug 29, 2022
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate resident supervision and failed to ensure care plans were implemented to minimize the risk of avoidable fall incident for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for supervision. This failure caused harm to Resident 1 who suffered facial and forehead injuries from the fall incident. Findings included . Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] for rehabilitation therapy. The resident's diagnoses list included stroke with ride sided weakness and dementia (memory problem). […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Jun 13, 2025
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food items were handled appropriately in accordance with professional standards of food safety for 32 of 75 residents (Residents 11, 3, 34, 128, 4, 178, 66, 28, 30, 33, 55, 182, 17, 51, 59, 36, 63, 74, 230, 183, 231, 44, 49, 7, 72, 52, 1, 13, 26, 53, 68 & 61), reviewed for food services. This failure placed the residents at risk of food-borne illness (caused by the ingestion of contaminated food or beverages) and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Food Procurement, Storage, and Distribution, revised on 07/08/2022, showed that the facility would store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food safety. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Jun 12, 2024
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure foods stored were labeled/dated and discarded after the expiration date or use by date in accordance with professional standards for food safety for 1 of 3 freezers (Kitchen Walk-In Freezer) and 2 of 2 refrigerators (Kitchen Walk-In Refrigerator and Residents' Refrigerator), reviewed for food services. This failure placed the residents at risk for food borne illness (caused by the ingestion of contaminated food or beverages) and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF850Jun 12, 2024
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to employ a qualified social worker that met the educational requirements and supervised social work experience for one year in a health care setting for 2 of 2 social workers (Staff J & P), reviewed for social worker qualifications. This failure placed the residents at risk for unmet social services care needs, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's document titled, Job Description Social Services Manager, dated November 2021, showed under section Education and/or Experience, an employee, Must have, as a minimum, a bachelor's [a type of undergraduate degree] degree in social work or a bachelor's degree in a human services field including but not limited to sociology [study of social life and… […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812May 21, 2023
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure foods stored were properly covered, labeled/dated, discarded after the expiration date, or use by date and ensure ready-to-eat food was handled appropriately in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. These failures placed the residents at risk for food borne illness (caused by the ingestion of contaminated food or beverages), cross contamination, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the following facility provided policies titled: 1. […]
Read 28 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 28 of 155 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Feb 13, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Jun 13, 2025Standard7 findings
- Mar 18, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Jun 12, 2024Standard8 findings
- May 21, 2023Standard9 findings
- Aug 29, 2022Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Jan 20, 2022Standard20 findings
- Feb 5, 2021Complaint1 finding
Show the 29 earlier surveys
- Apr 6, 2020Complaint1 finding
- Feb 4, 2020Complaint1 finding
- Jul 30, 2019Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
- May 9, 2019Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Apr 15, 2019Standard16 findings · 1 harm
- Dec 4, 2018Complaint3 findings
- Oct 8, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Jul 13, 2018Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Mar 16, 2018Standard12 findings
- Jan 10, 2018Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Dec 5, 2017Complaint1 finding
- Oct 30, 2017Complaint2 findings
- Jun 19, 2017Complaint2 findings
- Dec 6, 2016Standard4 findings
- May 5, 2016Complaint2 findings
- Dec 18, 2015Complaint2 findings
- Oct 5, 2015Standard8 findings
- Jul 16, 2015Complaint2 findings
- Mar 6, 2015Complaint1 finding
- Aug 7, 2014Standard10 findings
- Oct 10, 2013—1 finding
- Aug 2, 2013—1 finding · 1 harm
- Jun 14, 2013—5 findings
- Sep 11, 2012—2 findings
- Mar 15, 2012—17 findings · 1 harm
- Jan 26, 2012—1 finding
- Aug 11, 2011—1 finding
- Apr 14, 2011—5 findings
- Oct 18, 2010—1 finding
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction