Deficiency Index

PruittHealth - Moultrie

Moultrie, Georgia · CCN 115505

9 surveys since 2010, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
19
Surveys
9
Harm or worse
0
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2010–2023
’10’15’20’23
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worseNone

No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file7/9

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
68
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
PRUITTHEALTH
County
Colquitt · rural
Medicare-certified since
1990

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
5
Staffing
2
Quality measures
2

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=4, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Sep 7, 2023

1,159 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.243.30
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.78—
Annual nurse turnover50.0%46.0%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD375.0%E—F125.0%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 4 of the 19 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at PruittHealth - Moultrie, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Sep 7, 2023

    Based on observations, staff interviews, and a review of the facility's policies titled Labeling, Dating and Storing and Foodborne Illnesses the facility failed to ensure food items in the pantry, cooler, refrigerator, and freezer were properly labeled and dated, opened food items were securely wrapped and sealed and foods were discarded when expired. The facility failed to practice safe and sanitary methods when preparing foods to prevent cross contamination and the spread of bacteria. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF695Sep 7, 2023

    Based on observations, staff interview, review of the clinical record, and review of facility policy titled, Oxygen Administration, the facility failed to obtain a physician's order with a specific rate/setting for liters per minute (LPM) for oxygen therapy for, one of 12 residents (R) R #15 and failed to ensure the water humidification bottle was adequately filled for R #15. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Oxygen Administration with a revision date of 8/2/2023 revealed the following: 1. Procedure: Regulate liter flow to ordered flow rate. 2. Infection Control Policy of O2 Humidifier Bottles: (1) O2 humidifier bottles should be used on all patients/residents receiving higher than 2 liters/minute of oxygen flow. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF761Sep 7, 2023

    Based on observations, staff interviews and review of the facility policy titled, Medication Administration: General Guidelines, the facility failed to properly secure medications for one of two medication carts. Specifically, the facility left an insulin pen and four individually wrapped medication packages on top of the medication cart unattended. Findings include: Review of the facility policy Medication Administration: General Guidelines last revised on 4/10/2019, revealed: 16. During routine administration of medications, the medication cart is kept in the doorway of the patient/resident's room, with open drawers facing inward and all other sides closed and locked. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF842Feb 10, 2022

    Based on observations, record review, interviews, and review of facility policy 'Pressure Injury Prevention Program', the facility failed to enter wound care orders in the electronic medical record for one of one resident (R#47) reviewed for pressure ulcers. Findings include: Review of facility policy 'Pressure Injury Prevention Program' last revised 3/18/21 revealed: 'Procedure: B. Documentation 3. Documentation of the pressure injuries should be completed in the resident's EHR (electronic health record). Record review revealed R#47 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . Further review record review revealed R#47 had pressure ulcers to the left elbow, right foot, and sacrum. R#47 also has arterial ulcer to the left foot. […]

Read all 19 findings in full →

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Sep 7, 2023Standard3 findings
  • Feb 10, 2022Standard1 finding
  • Feb 26, 2020Complaint2 findings
  • Oct 25, 2018Standard1 finding
  • Aug 25, 2016Standard1 finding
  • Mar 6, 2014Standard2 findings
  • Jan 23, 2014—2 findings
  • Jun 7, 2012—3 findings
Show the 1 earlier survey
  • Dec 15, 2010—4 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction