Deficiency Index

Pruitthealth - Grandview

Athens, Georgia · CCN 115631

11 surveys since 2011, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
36
Surveys
11
Harm or worse
0
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worseNone

No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file8/11

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
72
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
PRUITTHEALTH
County
Clarke
Medicare-certified since
1997

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
5
Staffing
2
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=12, floor 20).

Last survey on record

May 17, 2026

176 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.133.30
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.25—
Annual nurse turnover18.4%46.0%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD440.0%E440.0%F220.0%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 10 of the 36 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Pruitthealth - Grandview, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF921Mar 20, 2025

    Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility- provided documents titled Packaged Terminal Air Conditioner (PTAC) Preventative Maintenance Guide and Heating Ventilation, and Air Conditioning (HVAC): Clean Air Filters details the following steps, the facility failed to maintain a clean, sanitary, and comfortable environment as evidenced by dirty PTAC filters for 42 out of 42 residents' rooms on three Halls (Hall A, Hall B and Hall C) and the C Hall Dayroom. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880Oct 5, 2023

    Based on observation, record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policies titled, Developing a Water Management Program to Reduce Legionella Growth & Spread in Buildings and Infection Prevention and Control Plan the facility failed to have a documented water management program that included measures to prevent the growth of opportunistic water-borne pathogens and how to monitor for them. This had the potential to affect 61 of 61 residents that resided at the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Developing a Water Management Program to Reduce Legionella Growth & Spread in Buildings, dated 6/5/2017 revealed, . […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF641Oct 5, 2023

    Based on record review, staff interview, and review of the RAI 3.0 User's Manual Version 1.18.11, and the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was accurately coded for five out of 23 Residents (R) 36, R18, R31, R33, and R58. This failure had the potential for the residents not to receive the necessary care and services related to the inaccurate data reflective of the residents status at the time of the assessment. Findings include: Review of the RAI 3.0 User's Manual Version 1.18.11, dated 10/1/2023, revealed . Chapter 2: Assessments for the RAI . 03. Significant Change in Status Assessment (SCSA) (A0310A = 04) . […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF657Oct 5, 2023

    Based on record reviews, staff and resident interviews, and review of the facility policy titled, Care Plans, the facility failed to conduct quarterly care plan conferences in a timely manner for 12 out of 23 Residents (R) 19, R39, R3, R14, R26, R37, R5, R6, R18, R31, R33, and R58. This failure had the potential for staff, residents, and resident representatives (RP) not to be informed of the care and treatment to meet the resident's needs in a timely manner. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Care Plans, revised 7/27/2023, revealed . 7. During all care plan meetings other than Admission Comprehensive Care Plan that was conducted during a Post Admission Care Conference: Review each problem, goal and approach . […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF700Oct 5, 2023

    Based on observation, staff and resident interview, record review, and facility policy titled, Bed Rails, the facility failed to obtain physician orders for the medical symptoms being treated by using bed rails, attempt to use appropriate alternatives prior to installing a side or bed rail, assess the resident for risk of entrapment from bed rails prior to installation, review the risks and benefits of bed rails with the resident or resident representative, and obtain informed consent prior to installation for 14 of 23 Residents (R) 19, R29, R36, R39, R14, R37, R55, R5, R6, R18, R31, R33, R56, and R57 reviewed for accident hazards. […]

Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 36 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • May 17, 2026Standard1 finding
  • Mar 20, 2025Standard2 findings
  • Oct 5, 2023Standard7 findings
  • Aug 21, 2022Standard2 findings
  • Jun 19, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Jun 7, 2019Standard4 findings
  • Apr 5, 2018Standard6 findings
  • May 4, 2017Standard3 findings
Show the 3 earlier surveys
  • Sep 18, 2014Standard6 findings
  • Nov 29, 2012—1 finding
  • Jul 21, 2011—3 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction