Pruitthealth - Fort Oglethorpe
Fort Oglethorpe, Georgia · CCN 115409
13 surveys since 2014, 4 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 40
- Surveys
- 13
- Harm or worse
- 4
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 120
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- PRUITTHEALTH
- County
- Catoosa
- Medicare-certified since
- 1989
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 3
- Health inspection
- 3
- Staffing
- 2
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 96 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in Georgia.
Last survey on record
Jan 15, 2026
298 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 2.70 | 3.35 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.47 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 47.4% | 46.5% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $10,699 across 2 penalties
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G210.0% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1575.0% | E210.0% | F15.0% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6892×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
- F8802×
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
- F5501×
Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
- F5611×
Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
- F5761×
Ensure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Pruitthealth - Fort Oglethorpe, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF656Jan 12, 2023
Based on observations, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan addressed the need for pain management prior to and/or during wound care for one of three sampled residents (R) (R#94) reviewed for pain management. The resident was observed to exhibit signs and symptoms of pain throughout a wound care procedure on 1/11/23 but did not receive pain medication until the surveyor intervened. Findings included: A review of a facility policy titled, Care Plans, effective dated 12/31/96, revealed. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF697Jan 12, 2023
Based on observation, interviews, record reviews, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure pain medication ordered on an as-needed (PRN) basis was administered prior to and/or during wound care for one of three sampled residents (R) (R#94) reviewed for pain during wound care. Specifically, no pain medication was administered to R#94 prior to wound care, and when the resident exhibited signs and symptoms of pain, the licensed nurse continued the wound care without administering pain medication until the surveyor intervened. This failed practice resulted in R#94 repeatedly exhibiting signs and symptoms of pain while wound care was provided. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Sep 12, 2024
Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of the facility's policies titled, Receiving and Storage of Food and Supplies and Hand Washing, the facility failed to ensure food stored in the kitchen was labeled, dated, and not expired. Additionally, staff failed to perform adequate hand hygiene when leaving and returning to food preparation area after touching the lid of trash can. This had the potential to increase the spread of foodborne illness and infection for 108 out of 109 residents that received meals from the kitchen. Findings include: Review of facility policy titled, Receiving and Storage of Food and Supplies dated [DATE]. Under the section labeled Guidelines: 1. The DM or trained designee is accountable for receiving and storage of food .7. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Apr 15, 2021
Based on observations, staff interviews, review of the facility policy titled Food Temperatures and record review revealed the facility staff failed to maintain several hot food items on the serving line at 135 degrees Fahrenheit (F) or above and one cold food item at 41 degrees Fahrenheit (F) or below, which had the potential to affect 82 of 82 residents receiving an oral diet. Findings include: Review of the policy titled Food Temperatures revised 3/24/2016 revealed: Procedure: 1. All hot foods served from the steam table must be held at or above 135 degrees. 2. All potentially hazardous cold foods must be held at 41 degress or less. 3. Food temperatures will be taken before and after serving, temperatures will be logged directly on the Food Temperature Log form. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF623Sep 12, 2024
Based on resident and staff interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide a written notice of a transfer to the resident and/or resident's Responsible Party (RP) for three of three residents (Resident (R) 80, R32, and R73) reviewed for hospitalization out of a sample of 32 residents. This had the potential for the resident and or RP not knowing where and why a resident was transferred. Findings include: 1. Review of the Resident Face Sheet located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Face Sheet tab documented R80 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had a diagnosis of dementia. […]
Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 40 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jan 15, 2026Standard and complaint5 findings
- Sep 12, 2024Standard and complaint5 findings
- Feb 8, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Jan 12, 2023Standard and complaint9 findings · 2 harm
- Sep 29, 2022Complaint2 findings
- Apr 15, 2021Standard2 findings
- Oct 7, 2020Complaint1 finding
- Aug 9, 2018Standard2 findings
Show the 5 earlier surveys
- Sep 8, 2017Standard3 findings
- Aug 24, 2017Complaint2 findings
- Apr 20, 2016Standard2 findings
- Mar 5, 2015Standard4 findings
- Mar 6, 2014Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction