Deficiency Index

Promontory Point Rehabilitation

Ammon, Idaho · CCN 135137

13 surveys since 2011, 5 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
106
Surveys
13
Harm or worse
5
Immediate jeopardy
1
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy1

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file10/13

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
50
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
PROMONTORY HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT
County
Bonneville
Medicare-certified since
2010

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
4
Staffing
5
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded fewer weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 24 for-profit facilities with fewer than 66 beds in Idaho.

Last survey on record

May 28, 2026

165 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day5.623.98
Registered-nurse hours per resident day1.43—
Annual nurse turnover21.3%55.6%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD1676.2%E523.8%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 21 of the 106 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F5542×

    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.

  • F5782×

    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.

  • F6842×

    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

  • F8802×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

  • F5521×

    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Promontory Point Rehabilitation, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF578May 28, 2026

    Based on policy review, record review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident and their representative received assistance to exercise their right to formulate an Advance Directive. This was true for 9 of 12 residents (Resident #2, # 3, #17, #29, #37, #52, #60, #61 and #66) whose records were reviewed for advance directives. This deficient practice created the potential for harm or adverse outcomes if residents' wishes were not followed or documented regarding their advance care planning. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF880May 28, 2026

    Based on observation, policy review, manufacture's manual review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure infection control prevention practices were maintained to provide a safe and sanitary environment for 2 of 2 residents (#57 and #66 ) observed for respiratory equipment use and clean/sanitary laundry rooms. These failures had the potential to impact all residents in the facility by placing them at risk for cross contamination and infection. Findings include:The facility's Nebulizer Therapy policy revision date [DATE], directed staff to clean the nebulizer after each use. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF578Mar 8, 2024

    Based on policy review, record review, and resident, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a residents' advance directive or POST were obtained and documented in their record. This was true for 4 of 12 residents (Resident #1, 130, #7, and #182) whose advance directives were reviewed. This deficient practice created the potential for harm or adverse outcomes if the residents' wishes regarding their advanced care plans were not followed or documented. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF655Mar 8, 2024

    Based on record review, policy review and resident staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a baseline care plan was reviewed and provided to residents' and their representative. This was true for 5 of 12 residents (#7, #16, #130, #181, and #184) whose records were reviewed. This failure placed residents at risk of not having their goals for care and services met. Findings include: A facility policy titled, Baseline Care Plan, undated, documented the facility would develop and implement a baseline care plan for each resident that included instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care that met professional standards of quality care. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF880Mar 8, 2024

    Based on policy review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure infection control measures were consistently implemented and maintained to provide a safe and sanitary environment. This was true for 2 of 4 residents (#116 and #133) observed for infection control. This failure created the potential for harm by placing residents at risk for cross-contamination and infection. Findings include: 1. Resident #133 was admitted on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including aftercare following total knee replacement. The facility's Personal Protective Equipment Policy (PPE), dated, 7/8/23, stated personal protective equipment appropriate to specific task requirements would be utilized per CDC guidelines. […]

Read 25 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 25 of 106 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • May 28, 2026Standard8 findings
  • Feb 12, 2025Standard3 findings
  • Mar 8, 2024Standard and complaint10 findings
  • Dec 10, 2020Infection control3 findings
  • Oct 21, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Jun 18, 2020Infection control1 finding · 1 harm
  • Mar 15, 2019Standard and complaint17 findings · 1 harm
  • Dec 15, 2017Standard7 findings
Show the 5 earlier surveys
  • Aug 25, 2016Standard8 findings
  • Mar 13, 2015Standard and complaint13 findings · 2 harm
  • Dec 20, 2013—17 findings · 1 harm
  • Oct 26, 2012—12 findings
  • Aug 25, 2011—6 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction