Prestige Care Center of Nebraska City
Nebraska City, Nebraska · CCN 285109
28 surveys since 2011, 14 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 164
- Surveys
- 28
- Harm or worse
- 14
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 64
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- PRESTIGE CARE CENTER
- County
- Otoe · rural
- Medicare-certified since
- 1991
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 1
- Health inspection
- 1
- Staffing
- 2
- Quality measures
- 1
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 25 for-profit facilities with fewer than 66 beds in Nebraska.
Last survey on record
Jul 16, 2026
116 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.41 | 3.71 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.45 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 76.6% | 64.2% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $15,625 across 1 penalty
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G48.2% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D2346.9% | E1530.6% | F714.3% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6896×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
- F5844×
Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
- F5803×
Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
- F8803×
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
- F6092×
Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Prestige Care Center of Nebraska City, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF684Sep 10, 2024
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.04(F)(i) Based on interview and record review, the facility staff failed to ensure practitioner's orders were implemented related to ordered medications, ordered laboratory (Labs) testing and obtaining weights for Residents 1 and failed to obtain weights as ordered for Resident 3 of 3 sampled residents. The facility census was 46 residents. Findings are: A. A review of Resident 3's Face Admission Record revealed Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of congestive heart failure [a chronic condition in which the heart is unable to pump blood efficiently enough to meet the body's needs]. A review of Resident 3's admission orders dated 7/31/24 revealed order for daily weights. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF686Jun 9, 2022
LICENSURE REFERENCE NUMBER 175 NAC 12-006.09D2b Based on observation, record review and interview; the facility staff failed to implement interventions, evaluate casual factors and evaluate the condition of the development of a pressure ulcer for 1 (Resident 40) of 4 sampled residents. The facility staff identified a census of 38. Findings are: Record review of Resident 40's Admission/Readmission Nursing Evaluation ([NAME]) dated 5-06-2022 revealed had [CONDITION(S)] and a [CONDITION(S)]. According to the [NAME] dated 5-06-2022 Resident 40 was evaluated as a low risk for the development of a pressure ulcer. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF697Jun 9, 2022
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement a pain management program for 1 sampled resident (Resident 40). The facility had a total census of 36 residents. The sample size was 12. The findings are: A review of a wound assessment for Resident 40 dated 7/28/22 and completed by DNP K (Doctor of Nursing Practice) revealed Resident 40 had an unstageable pressure ulcer to their left heel that measured 2.31 cm (centimeters) x 3.03 cm with a depth of 0.2 cm. DNP K documented that the wound had deteriorated since the last evaluation on 7/14/22. An observation on 8/18/22 at 8:45 AM revealed RN A (Registered Nurse) provided wound care to a pressure ulcer on Resident 40's left heel. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF697Jun 9, 2022
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement a pain management program for 1 sampled resident (Resident 40). The facility had a total census of 36 residents. The sample size was 12. The findings are: A review of a wound assessment for Resident 40 dated 7/28/22 and completed by DNP K (Doctor of Nursing Practice) revealed Resident 40 had an unstageable pressure ulcer to their left heel that measured 2.31 cm (centimeters) x 3.03 cm with a depth of 0.2 cm. DNP K documented that the wound had deteriorated since the last evaluation on 7/14/22. An observation on 8/18/22 at 8:45 AM revealed RN A (Registered Nurse) provided wound care to a pressure ulcer on Resident 40's left heel. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF760Jun 9, 2022
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.10D Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to clarify and implement a medication for the treatment of [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . The facility had a total census of 36 residents. The findings are: An observation on 8/18/22 at 11:40 AM revealed Resident 26 sat in a recliner in their room with their feet up in a reclined position. Resident 26 did not respond or open their eyes to voice or when NA H (Nurse Aide) repositioned the resident in their chair. In an interview on 8/18/22 at 11:40 AM, NA H reported Resident 26 had declined significantly since being diagnosed with COVID-19. NA H reported Resident 26 used to run in the hallways, but now wasn't even able to walk. […]
Read 34 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 34 of 164 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Aug 19, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Jul 16, 2026Complaint5 findings
- Jun 23, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Mar 5, 2026Standard and complaint15 findings
- Dec 17, 2025Complaint2 findings
- Nov 18, 2025Complaint4 findings
- Sep 22, 2025Complaint3 findings
- Nov 13, 2024Standard and complaint3 findings
Show the 20 earlier surveys
- Sep 10, 2024Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
- Sep 14, 2023Standard4 findings
- Oct 24, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Jun 9, 2022Standard and complaint25 findings · 5 harm
- Jul 27, 2021Complaint7 findings
- Sep 23, 2020Standard15 findings · 3 harm
- Oct 2, 2019Standard and complaint13 findings · 1 harm
- Jul 17, 2019Complaint3 findings
- Jun 28, 2018Standard3 findings
- May 2, 2017Standard6 findings
- Nov 2, 2016Complaint2 findings
- Jan 11, 2016Standard and complaint10 findings · 1 harm
- Sep 10, 2015Complaint9 findings
- Apr 30, 2015Complaint2 findings
- Dec 11, 2014Standard and complaint20 findings · 3 harm
- Jun 3, 2014Complaint1 finding
- Nov 5, 2013—3 findings
- Jul 30, 2012—1 finding
- Apr 12, 2012—2 findings
- Sep 1, 2011—1 finding
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction