Prescott Nursing and Rehab Community
Prescott, Wisconsin · CCN 525398
28 surveys since 2010, 9 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 130
- Surveys
- 28
- Harm or worse
- 9
- Immediate jeopardy
- 4
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 65
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- ATRIUM CENTERS
- County
- Pierce
- Medicare-certified since
- 1985
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 3
- Health inspection
- 3
- Staffing
- 4
- Quality measures
- 2
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 92 for-profit facilities with fewer than 66 beds in Wisconsin.
Last survey on record
Jul 13, 2026
119 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.56 | 3.73 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.74 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 42.9% | 45.7% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $30,654 across 1 penalty
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J13.7% | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D2177.8% | E27.4% | F311.1% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F8804×
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
- F6842×
Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
- F6892×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
- F6932×
Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
- F5801×
Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Prescott Nursing and Rehab Community, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF693Apr 7, 2025
Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure residents who were fed by enteral means received the appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications for 1 of 1 resident (R) reviewed. (R33) R33 was not given enteral feeding nutrition as ordered; instead R33 received twice as much as ordered resulting in vomiting and aspiration, requiring suctioning and transfer to hospital on [DATE] where R33 expired on [DATE]. The facility's failure to properly monitor, assess, and correctly follow physician (MD) orders and treatments for enteral feeding resulted in resident receiving twice as much enteral feeding as ordered and created a finding of Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) that began on [DATE]. […]
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF580Aug 24, 2021
Based on interview and record review the facility did not consult with the resident's physician when the resident had a significant change in condition for 2 of 3 residents (R) reviewed (R6, R5). *R6 had a decrease in oxygen saturation and change in mental status and the physician was not consulted and medical intervention was not obtained. This resulted in the resident developing [CONDITION(S)], and the resident expired. Failure to consult with a physician when a resident had a significant change in condition created a finding of immediate jeopardy that began on [DATE]. Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) A and Director of Nursing (DON) B were notified of the immediate jeopardy on [DATE] at 3:30 PM. […]
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF678Aug 24, 2021
Based on interview and record review, the facility did not provide basic life support, including CPR (Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation) for 1 of 1 residents (R) reviewed, in accordance with the resident's treatment options (R6). R6's treatment options at time of admission on [DATE] stated Full Resuscitation. On [DATE], nursing staff called 911 due to R6's low oxygen saturation and unresponsiveness. Paramedic's note stated R6 was pulseless upon their arrival, and CPR was started by paramedics. The paramedic note stated staff stated R6 may have been pulseless for 5 to 10 minutes. Nursing staff did not initiate CPR prior to the arrival of the paramedics. […]
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF695Aug 24, 2021
Based on record review and interview, the facility did not ensure that 1 of 1 residents (R) reviewed received appropriate respiratory care, consistent with professional standards of practice (Wisconsin Nurse Practice Act), during a significant change in medical condition (R6). R6 had a significant change in medical condition with a drop in oxygen saturation to the low 80s. R6 had ongoing change in mental status despite improved oxygen saturations. The facility did not provide ongoing assessment, planning, intervention, or evaluation throughout the day. R6 developed respiratory failure and died . The facility's failure to recognize the significant change in condition, and provide appropriate respiratory care, created a finding of immediate jeopardy that began on [DATE]. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF684Aug 24, 2021
Based on record review and interview, the facility did not ensure that a resident (R) with bleeding and drainage from a surgical wound received the necessary care and treatment in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 of 1 residents reviewed, (R5.) R5 had a fall on 06/18/21 and was evaluated in the emergency department (ED). R5 had bloody drainage noted from a right hip surgical dressing after the fall. The bleeding and drainage continued from the surgical dressing after R5 returned from the ED. The facility did not assess the surgical incision or dressing to determine if a change in treatment was needed. […]
Read 28 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 28 of 130 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jul 13, 2026Complaint1 finding
- May 13, 2026Standard4 findings
- Apr 7, 2025Standard12 findings · 1 harm
- Feb 14, 2024Standard and complaint10 findings
- Feb 20, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Dec 15, 2022Standard and complaint6 findings
- Nov 30, 2022Complaint4 findings
- Jul 26, 2022Complaint1 finding
Show the 20 earlier surveys
- Jan 5, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Oct 14, 2021Standard and complaint6 findings
- Aug 24, 2021Complaint4 findings · 4 harm
- May 22, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Oct 16, 2019Standard7 findings
- Apr 23, 2019Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Mar 12, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Nov 21, 2017Complaint2 findings
- Sep 21, 2017Standard6 findings
- Sep 14, 2016Standard4 findings
- Mar 23, 2016Complaint2 findings
- Oct 13, 2015Complaint1 finding
- Aug 24, 2015Standard7 findings
- Dec 17, 2014Complaint1 finding
- Jul 30, 2014Standard6 findings
- Jul 23, 2013—25 findings
- Jul 11, 2012—8 findings · 1 harm
- May 21, 2012—4 findings · 1 harm
- Mar 22, 2011—3 findings
- Dec 22, 2010—1 finding · 1 harm
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction