Pratt Health and Rehab
Pratt, Kansas · CCN 175315
20 surveys since 2011, 14 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 110
- Surveys
- 20
- Harm or worse
- 14
- Immediate jeopardyall corrected before survey
- 7
Findings at the most serious level CMS records. All were recorded as past non-compliance — corrected before the survey.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 45
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- MISSION HEALTH COMMUNITIES
- County
- Pratt · rural
- Medicare-certified since
- 1994
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 4
- Health inspection
- 4
- Staffing
- 4
- Quality measures
- 3
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 108 for-profit facilities with fewer than 66 beds in Kansas.
Last survey on record
Mar 17, 2026
237 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.76 | 3.78 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.85 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 47.5% | 50.0% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $14,901 across 1 penalty
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J14.5% | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G14.5% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1986.4% | E— | F14.5% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6893×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
- F6572×
Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
- F7582×
Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
- F8802×
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
- F5501×
Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Pratt Health and Rehab, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Apr 3, 2025
The facility reported a census of 41 residents with three residents sampled for safety related to transportation outside the facility. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that staff provided a safe environment, free of accident hazards during transportation in the facility van. On 03/11/25 at approximately 09:20 AM Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) C failed to ensure Resident (R)1 was safely secured in the facility van before operating the vehicle. CNA C began to drive the van and realized R1 did not have a seatbelt on. CNA C then stopped the vehicle and R1 fell out of the wheelchair onto the floor of the facility van and injured his head, face and left arm. This deficient practice placed R1 in immediate jeopardy. […]
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF678Jun 8, 2022
The facility reported a census of 37, with three residents sampled for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR, emergency medical procedure for restoring normal heartbeat and breathing to victims of heart failure, drowning). Based on interview and record review the facility failed to have an effective code system in place when staff failed to implement CPR on a non-responsive full code Resident (R)1 on [DATE] at 02:20 AM, which placed R1 in immediate jeopardy. Findings included: - The physician's orders [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . The [DATE] Admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. The [DATE] Care Plan, revised [DATE], indicated R1 and R1's family desired a full code status for R1. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF697Jul 28, 2022
The facility census totaled 43 residents with 12 included in the sample. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure staff identified and promptly responded to signs of pain expressed by cognitively impaired Resident (R)12, when the resident had two fractured ribs and staff did not offer the resident non-pharmacological pain interventions or as needed (PRN) pain medications. Findings included: - Resident (R)12's signed Physician order [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 00, indicating severe cognitive impairment. The assessment documented the resident had no pain. The Pain Care Area Assessment (CAA) did not trigger for the 05/18/22 assessment. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880Mar 17, 2026
The facility had a census of 38 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions for Resident (R) 8, who had dressing changes to a pressure ulcer daily. The facility also failed to implement a complete water management program for Legionella disease (Legionella is a bacterium spread through mist, such as air-conditioning units in large buildings. Adults over the age of 50 and people with weak immune systems, or chronic lung diseases). […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF582Mar 17, 2026
The facility had a census of 38 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with three reviewed for Medicare Liability Notices. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide Resident (R) 8, R10, and R17, or their representative, a Notice of Medicare Non-coverage (NOMNC) when skilled services ended.Findings included:-A review of R8's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented that her Medicare Part A episode began on 10/23/25 and ended on 01/09/26. Review of R8's clinical record and facility-provided information lacked evidence that R8 was issued a SNF NOMNC as required. A review of R10's EMR documented that his Medicare Part A episode began on 06/27/25 and ended on 08/21/25. […]
Read 32 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 32 of 110 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Mar 17, 2026Standard3 findings
- Apr 3, 2025Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Apr 17, 2024Standard9 findings
- Jan 5, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Jul 28, 2022Standard9 findings · 1 harm
- Jun 8, 2022Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Jan 28, 2021Standard2 findings
- Jul 23, 2019Standard2 findings
Show the 12 earlier surveys
- Aug 30, 2017Complaint4 findings · 3 harm
- Aug 24, 2016Standard6 findings
- Jun 2, 2016Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Apr 5, 2016Complaint3 findings · 3 harm
- Mar 12, 2015Standard and complaint13 findings
- Apr 2, 2014Complaint5 findings · 1 harm
- Nov 19, 2013—16 findings · 2 harm
- Aug 28, 2013—8 findings
- Aug 9, 2012—8 findings
- May 29, 2012—4 findings
- Aug 10, 2011—13 findings · 1 harm
- Feb 15, 2011—1 finding
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction