Plymouth Harbor Incorporated
Sarasota, Florida · CCN 105817
10 surveys since 2011, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 32
- Surveys
- 10
- Harm or worse
- 0
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 56
- Ownership
- Non profit - Corporation
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Sarasota
- Medicare-certified since
- 1993
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 4
- Health inspection
- 4
- Staffing
- 3
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=5, floor 20).
Last survey on record
Dec 11, 2025
333 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 5.31 | 5.05 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.66 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 71.7% | 25.0% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D360.0% | E240.0% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Plymouth Harbor Incorporated, in the surveyor’s own words.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF684Mar 27, 2025
Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide care and services in accordance with professional standards of practice by failing to administer medications in accordance with the physician's orders for 1 (Resident #22) of 4 residents reviewed for compliance with physician's orders. The findings included: On 3/26/25 at 8:34 a.m., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Staff A was observed preparing to administer medications to Resident #22, including Vitamin D3. LPN Staff A said she needed to clarify the order for the Vitamin D3 before administering it to the resident. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF689Mar 27, 2025
Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to implement care plan interventions to prevent falls and fall related injuries for 1 (Resident #12) with multiple falls of 2 residents reviewed for fall prevention. The findings included: Review of the clinical record for Resident #12 revealed an admitted [DATE]. Diagnoses included Dementia and Pelvic fracture due to multiple falls. Review of the Admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with a target date of 1/24/25 revealed Resident #12's cognition was severely impaired with a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 7. The assessment noted the resident was dependent on staff for toileting (Helper does all the effort). Toilet transfer was not attempted due to safety concerns. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF600Dec 11, 2025
Based on record review, review of facility's policies and procedures and staff interviews, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical abuse by staff for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 residents reviewed.The findings included:Review of the facility's Abuse Prevention Policy effective 8/18/10, last revised December 2022 revealed Policy: 1. Plymouth Harbor will exercise all possible efforts to reduce the risk to residents from harm or mistreatment and to prevent incidents of Abuse, Neglect, Sexual Misconduct or Exploitation. 2. All allegations of abuse, neglect, sexual misconduct or exploitation of a resident will be thoroughly investigated and the resident protected during the course of the investigation. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF578Mar 27, 2025
Based on clinical record review, resident representative and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the clinical record accurately reflected the residents' advance directives for 2 (Residents #5 and #8) of 2 residents reviewed for advance directives. The findings included: Review of the facility's Advance Directive Policy (revised [DATE]) revealed prior to or upon admission of a resident, the Social Services Director or designee inquires of the resident, his/her family members and/or his or her legal representative, about the existence of any written advance directives. Upon admission the interdisciplinary team assesses the resident's decision-making capacity and identifies the primary decision-maker if the resident is determined not to have decision-making capacity. 1. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF657Mar 27, 2025
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop, implement and revise the care plan to meet the needs and preferences of 3 (Residents #5, #8 and #12) of 3 reviewed for care plans. The findings included: 1. Review of Resident #5's clinical record revealed an admitted [DATE]. Diagnoses included cerebral infarction and dementia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment with a target date of [DATE] revealed Resident #5's cognition was severely impaired with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 06. […]
Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 32 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Dec 11, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Mar 27, 2025Standard4 findings
- Nov 7, 2019Standard3 findings
- Dec 6, 2018Standard5 findings
- Jun 20, 2016Complaint1 finding
- Oct 22, 2015Standard5 findings
- Sep 5, 2014Standard2 findings
- Aug 14, 2013—4 findings
Show the 2 earlier surveys
- Jul 20, 2012—3 findings
- Jul 28, 2011—4 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction