Pleasant Hills Community Living Center
Jackson, Mississippi · CCN 255112
34 surveys since 2011, 34 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 160
- Surveys
- 34
- Harm or worse
- 34
- Immediate jeopardyall corrected before survey
- 17
Findings at the most serious level CMS records. All were recorded as past non-compliance — corrected before the survey.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 100
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- COMMUNITY ELDERCARE SERVICES
- County
- Hinds
- Medicare-certified since
- 1989
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 1
- Health inspection
- 2
- Staffing
- 3
- Quality measures
- 1
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 44 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in Mississippi.
Last survey on record
Feb 23, 2026
259 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.74 | 3.89 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.43 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 55.3% | 45.0% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $160,023 across 5 penalties
- Payment denials
- 1
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J28.3% | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G28.3% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1666.7% | E28.3% | F28.3% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6895×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
- F5504×
Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
- F7612×
Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
- F5571×
Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
- F5581×
Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Pleasant Hills Community Living Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Dec 4, 2025
Based on observation, interviews, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and a secure environment to prevent the elopement of one (1) of ten (10) sampled residents, Resident #9. On 11/28/25, at approximately 10:40 AM a member of the facility staff observed Resident #9 with a Rollator exit the facility behind a visiting nurse. Resident # 9 was outside unsupervised for approximately 22 minutes. At 11:02 AM Resident # 9 was located 0.4 miles away from the facility down a busy four lane street in the parking lot of a local funeral home. […]
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Mar 21, 2024
Based on interviews, record review, facility policy review, and facility investigation review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent Resident #1, who was a vulnerable resident, from exiting the facility unnoticed and unsupervised for one (1) of four (4) residents reviewed. Resident #1 Resident #1 kicked open an entrance door and exited the facility. He was last observed by facility staff to be in his room in bed at 1:15 AM on 3/9/2024. The facility staff were unaware of Resident #1's absence until 3:15 AM when a staff member entered his room and noted he was not in bed. Resident #1 was located in a neighboring town by the police department at 9:09 AM, approximately 12 miles from the facility. […]
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF657Oct 28, 2022
Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to revise a fall care plan following a fall with a major injury and two (2) additional falls for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for falls, Resident #6. The facility's failure to have a communication system in place with the interdisciplinary team and a system in place to ensure compliance of revising care plans with appropriate interventions following a fall placed this resident and other residents at risk for a fall in a situation that was likely to cause serious injury, serious harm, serious impairment, or death. […]
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Oct 28, 2022
Based on observation, interviews, record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to put in place appropriate interventions to prevent an incident of an unwitnessed fall on 08/02/2022 that resulted in a closed non-displaced fracture of the head of left radius for Resident #6, one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for falls. A fall risk assessment was completed after admission to the facility on [DATE], which indicated Resident #6 was at high risk for falls. Resident #6 had an unwitnessed fall on 08/02/2022. Resident # 6 was found to be laying on the floor beneath the bedside table. She was sent to the local hospital for further evaluation. X-rays completed at the hospital revealed a closed nondisplaced fracture of head of left radius. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Feb 23, 2026
Based on observation, record reviews, interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to properly secure a wheelchair security device and prevent accidents for residents who depended on the facility van and staff for transfers to medical appointments for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents. Resident #1. Findings Included:Record review of the facility of the facility policy Accidents/Incidents (undated) revealed .Purpose: To assure that all persons who are involved in an incident or accident, or suspected to have had an incident or accident, are evaluated and receive treatment as indicated and are monitored for disposition of incident and accident .Record review of the incident report dated 1/08/26 for Resident #1 revealed the incident was described as . while in route to Dr. […]
Read 50 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 50 of 160 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Feb 23, 2026Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Dec 4, 2025Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Jun 24, 2025Complaint9 findings · 1 harm
- Dec 12, 2024Standard and complaint2 findings
- Jul 11, 2024Standard4 findings
- Apr 8, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Mar 21, 2024Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Feb 14, 2024Standard2 findings
Show the 26 earlier surveys
- Dec 12, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Sep 29, 2023Standard and complaint8 findings · 4 harm
- Apr 6, 2023Standard7 findings
- Oct 28, 2022Standard15 findings · 2 harm
- May 23, 2022Standard7 findings
- Mar 15, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Dec 15, 2021Standard5 findings
- Jul 9, 2021Standard and complaint7 findings · 2 harm
- Nov 18, 2020Complaint6 findings · 6 harm
- Jul 3, 2020Standard and complaint11 findings · 7 harm
- Mar 5, 2020Standard4 findings
- Apr 4, 2019Standard5 findings · 3 harm
- May 4, 2018Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
- Jul 27, 2017Complaint1 finding
- Jun 23, 2017Standard5 findings
- Aug 18, 2016Standard10 findings
- Apr 8, 2016Complaint3 findings
- Jul 23, 2015Standard2 findings
- Sep 25, 2014Standard12 findings · 2 harm
- Aug 16, 2013—4 findings
- Jun 13, 2013—1 finding
- Jan 5, 2013—1 finding
- Sep 26, 2012—5 findings
- Jul 13, 2011—7 findings
- May 11, 2011—4 findings
- Feb 24, 2011—5 findings · 2 harm
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction