Deficiency Index

Pioneer Valley Living And Rehab

Sergeant Bluff, Iowa · CCN 165615

14 surveys since 2016. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2020.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
98
Surveys
14
Harm or worse
7
Immediate jeopardy
3
The record, 2016–2026
’16’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy3

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file9/14

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
66
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
Independent
County
Woodbury
Medicare-certified since
2016

CMS ratings

Overall
1
Health inspection
1
Staffing
4
Quality measures
3

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 56 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in Iowa.

Last survey on record

Mar 3, 2026

251 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.723.54
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.56—
Annual nurse turnover46.6%44.6%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Payment denials
1

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ23.2%K—L—
Actual harmG34.8%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD3758.7%E1320.6%F812.7%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 63 of the 98 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6584×

    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.

  • F6844×

    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

  • F8804×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

  • F6373×

    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition

  • F6403×

    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Pioneer Valley Living And Rehab, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF600Jul 13, 2023

    Based on clinical record reviews, observations, resident and staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to protect a vulnerable resident (Resident #22) from inappropriate sexual contact from another resident (Resident #9) while the staff sat at the nurses' station. Following the incident, Resident #9 continued to be allowed in Day Room with Resident #22. The staff reported that Resident #9 could walk independently throughout the facility and the facility did not always have staff in the common area near the nurses' station. In addition, the facility implemented an intervention to monitor Resident #9's location at all times but documented on it three times a day. During this time frame, Resident #9 had two documented instances of interaction with Resident #22. […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Jul 13, 2023

    Based on facility document review, clinical record review, and staff interviews the facility failed to protect residents from accidents and injuries by not providing a newly hired Temporary Nurse Aide (TNA)/Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) enough education to know which residents could go outside unsupervised and/or if a resident could get up after a fall before a nurse assessed them. After the TNA left the resident outside unsupervised and without a means to call for help, the resident fell hitting her head that resulted in a hematoma (a collection of blood outside of a blood vessel). Following the incident, the facility failed to provide formal education to all the staff of which residents could be outside unsupervised. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF686Feb 6, 2025

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to implement interventions to prevent pressure ulcers for 1 of 3 residents reviewed, (Resident #31). At the time of survey, Resident #31 was found to be sitting in the recliner in his room for long periods of time with no pressure-reducing device on the seat. The resident had two open sores on his buttocks. The facility reported a census of 47 residents. Findings include: According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], Resident #31 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 (intact cognitive ability). He required moderate assistance with toileting hygiene, lower body dressing, and toileting transfers. His diagnoses included; renal insufficiency, peripheral vascular disease, and hip fracture. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Feb 6, 2025

    Based on observations, record review, facility investigative file review, resident and staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to ensure 2 of 3 residents (Resident #11 and #96) reviewed were free of accidents/hazards with transfers. The facility reported a census of 47 residents. Findings include: 1) The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment tool with a reference date of 8/2/24, documented Resident #96 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 9. A BIMS score of 9 suggested Resident #96 had mild cognitive impairment. Resident #96 did not exhibit behaviors during the review period nor did he reject care during the review period. He has impairments on both sides to bilateral upper and lower extremities and utilized a wheelchair. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF760Feb 6, 2025

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to assure residents were free from significant medication errors for 1 of 22 residents reviewed, (Resident #30). The facility reported a census of 47 residents. Findings Include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #30 documented a diagnoses of Diabetes Mellitus (DM), renal insufficiency and hypertension. The MDS indicated the resident required the high risk drug class of insulin injections for DM management. The MDS showed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11, which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. The Care Plan for Resident #30 showed the following related to DM: a. Diabetes medication of glucose tabs, glipizide and insulin ordered by the physician. b. […]

Read 26 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 26 of 98 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Mar 3, 2026Standard and complaint6 findings
  • Apr 3, 2025Complaint13 findings
  • Feb 6, 2025Standard and complaint21 findings · 3 harm
  • Feb 15, 2024Standard and complaint15 findings
  • Jul 13, 2023Complaint8 findings · 2 harm
  • Dec 15, 2022Standard and complaint4 findings
  • Aug 5, 2021Standard and complaint4 findings
  • Aug 17, 2020Complaint6 findings · 2 harm
Show the 6 earlier surveys
  • Nov 21, 2019Standard and complaint5 findings
  • Sep 20, 2018Standard10 findings
  • Oct 18, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 15, 2017Standard1 finding
  • Nov 3, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 28, 2016Standard3 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction