Deficiency Index

Pioneer Ridge Retirement Community

Lawrence, Kansas · CCN 175445

20 surveys since 2010. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2014.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
92
Surveys
20
Harm or worse
6
Immediate jeopardyall corrected before survey
2
The record, 2010–2026
’10’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy2

Findings at the most serious level CMS records. All were recorded as past non-compliance — corrected before the survey.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file13/20

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
76
Ownership
For profit - Partnership
Chain
MIDWEST HEALTH
County
Douglas
Medicare-certified since
2001

CMS ratings

Overall
1
Health inspection
1
Staffing
4
Quality measures
3

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 43 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in Kansas.

Last survey on record

Jul 7, 2026

125 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.213.56
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.85—
Annual nurse turnover50.0%52.1%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$29,286 across 2 penalties

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ23.8%K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD3667.9%E815.1%F59.4%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C23.8%
CMS’s current file: 53 of the 92 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6894×

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

  • F8803×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

  • F5502×

    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.

  • F6572×

    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.

  • F6842×

    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Pioneer Ridge Retirement Community, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Jun 1, 2026

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and failed to respond appropriately to alarms to prevent the elopement of Resident (R) 1, who was cognitively impaired, had a history of wandering and exit seeking, and was at risk for falls. On 04/26/26 at 01:44 AM, R1 pushed on the Blue-Hall emergency exit door, which sounded the alarm immediately when pushed, then opened after 15 seconds, and R1 exited the facility. Licensed Nurse (LN) G sat at the nurse's station with a clear view of the emergency exit door but did not look up or respond to the door alarm. At 02:05 AM, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) M approached the nurse's station and asked LN G where the alarm was coming from, and LN G stated it was likely an exit door. […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF806Mar 19, 2025

    The facility reported a census of 61 residents, with 9 sampled. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the staff provided Resident (R) 1 a peanut-free meal, per his reported allergies upon admission. On 03/07/25 at 06:30 PM, the staff provided R1 a peanut butter cookie with his dinner and the staff failed to verify his documented allergies on his meal ticket. R1 had an anaphylaxis allergic reaction to the peanut butter that resulted in vomiting. The facility could not provide epinephrine to R1 to prevent further potential anaphylaxis-related symptoms and the facility transferred R1 to the hospital. R1 received the epinephrine at the hospital and was admitted to the hospital on 03/07/25 for anaphylaxis. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Feb 7, 2023

    The facility reported a census of 49 residents. The sample included three residents at risk for falls. Based on record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure staff provided care planned fall interventions for Resident (R) 1 to prevent a fall. On 01/26/22 at 01:34 PM, R1 fell from a Sit-To-Stand lift (mechanical device used to help mobility impaired residents transition from a seated to a standing position) when one staff member assisted in the transfer, instead of the care planned two staff assistance. Consequently, the inappropriately applied lift sling, separated on one side of the lift, and caused R1 to fall backwards, striking R1's head on the tile floor. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF730Dec 3, 2025

    The facility had a census of 62 residents. The sample included 17 residents. Five Certified Nurse Aides (CNA) were reviewed for yearly performance evaluations and in-service training. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure one of the five reviewed CNA staff had the required yearly performance evaluations completed. This placed the residents at risk for inadequate care.Findings included: - Review of the facility's performance evaluation and in-service records revealed the following:CNA N, hired 09/30/23, had no yearly performance evaluations provided upon request.On 12/03/25 at 09:30 AM, Administrator A stated the facility did not have a performance evaluation for CNA N.On 12/03/25 at 02:43 PM, Administrative Nurse D stated that yearly evaluations were completed… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Dec 3, 2025

    The facility identified a census of 62 residents. The facility had one main kitchen and two dining areas. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that staff members properly tested the dishwashing sanitization chemicals documented freezer and refrigerate temperatures. The facility also failed to staff donned hairnets and beard guards and maintain dairy food at the appropriate temperature. Findings included:- During the initial tour of the kitchen and dining room area on 12/01/25 at 07:10 AM, an open undated gallon of milk sat in a brown tub without ice. Dietary Staff EE tempted the open milk, which was 46 degrees. The Milk was discarded. Dietary Staff EE lacked a hairnet when setting up the breakfast serving line. […]

Read 25 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 25 of 92 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jul 7, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 1, 2026Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Dec 3, 2025Standard20 findings
  • Aug 20, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 19, 2025Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • Oct 17, 2024Standard and complaint15 findings
  • Jul 19, 2023Standard13 findings
  • Feb 7, 2023Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
Show the 12 earlier surveys
  • Nov 17, 2021Standard8 findings
  • Sep 10, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Dec 4, 2019Standard1 finding
  • Nov 7, 2018Standard2 findings
  • May 16, 2017Standard2 findings
  • Feb 2, 2017Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • Sep 15, 2015Standard3 findings · 1 harm
  • May 28, 2014Standard5 findings · 1 harm
  • Feb 13, 2013—3 findings
  • Mar 15, 2012—1 finding
  • Nov 21, 2011—3 findings
  • Sep 16, 2010—7 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction