Pines Retirement Center of Baton Rouge
Baton Rouge, Louisiana · CCN 195512
39 surveys since 2011, 16 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 161
- Surveys
- 39
- Harm or worse
- 16
- Immediate jeopardy
- 15
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 85
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- ARK POST ACUTE NETWORK
- County
- E. Baton Rouge
- Medicare-certified since
- 2000
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 1
- Health inspection
- 1
- Staffing
- 2
- Quality measures
- 2
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 27 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in Louisiana.
Last survey on record
Sep 10, 2025
425 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.98 | 3.48 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.26 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 73.5% | 44.8% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $174,993 across 1 penalty
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K11.5% | L22.9% |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D2739.7% | E3551.5% | F22.9% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C11.5% |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F5844×
Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
- F6004×
Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
- F6584×
Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
- F7324×
Post nurse staffing information every day.
- F8424×
Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Pines Retirement Center of Baton Rouge, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, widespreadF609Oct 10, 2024
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure all alleged violations of abuse were reported to the state survey agency. The facility failed to: 1. Ensure allegations of verbal and physical abuse were reported to the State Survey Agency, immediately but not later than 2 hours after the allegation was made for 5 (#35, #42, #46, #51, and #52) of 19 sampled residents reviewed for abuse; and 2. Report the results of the investigations within 5 working days with appropriate corrective actions implemented for 5 (#35, #42, #46, #51, and #52) of 19 sampled residents reviewed for abuse. This deficient practice resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy situation on 09/04/2024 when multiple staff witnessed S4CNA and S5CNA curse, yell, and point in Resident #52's face. […]
- Immediate jeopardy, widespreadF835Oct 10, 2024
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure it was administered in a manner that enabled its resources to be used effectively and efficiently to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. The facility failed to have an effective system in place to: 1. Ensure residents remained free from verbal and mental abuse for 3 (#42, #46, and #52) of 7 (#18, #26, #42, #46, #51, #52, and #111) residents reviewed for abuse; and 2. Ensure allegations of verbal and physical abuse were reported to the State Survey Agency, immediately but not later than 2 hours after the allegation was made for 5 (#35, #42, #46, #51, and #52) of 19 sampled residents reviewed for abuse; and 3. […]
- Immediate jeopardy, patternF600Oct 10, 2024
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure each resident remained free from verbal and mental abuse for 3 (#42, #46, and #52) of 7 (#18, #26, #42, #46, #51, #52, and #111) residents reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to prevent: 1. S4CNA and S5CNA from yelling, cursing, and pointing at Resident #52 while surrounding the wheelchair and preventing the resident from getting away; and 2. S6CNA from yelling and cursing at Resident #52 in the hall; and 3. S13LPN from intimidating and threatening Resident #42; and 4. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Sep 10, 2025
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. The facility failed to ensure:1. The can opener was free of a dried, black substance and metal shavings;2. Ceiling vents in the kitchen were properly cleaned and free of black and brown substances; 3. Ceiling tiles above the steam table were secured and free of a gray fluffy substance;4. The Steamer drip pan was not overflowing a white, liquid substance onto the table and floor; and5. Milk was held at a safe temperature for consumption of 41 degrees Fahrenheit or below prior to being served to residents. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF867Oct 24, 2023
Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to implement and monitor appropriate plans of action to correct identified quality deficiencies. The facility failed to ensure staff were monitored for providing and documenting ADL care for 2 (#4 and #5) of 5 (#1, #2, #3, #4, and #5) residents reviewed for ADLs. This failed practice had the potential to effect all 53 residents who currently resided in the facility. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled, Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Program revealed the following, in part: Policy Statement: The facility shall develop, implement, and maintain an ongoing, facility-wide Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program that builds on the Quality Assessment and Assurance Program to… […]
Read 33 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 33 of 161 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Sep 10, 2025Standard10 findings
- Jul 24, 2025Complaint3 findings
- Feb 4, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Oct 10, 2024Standard and complaint14 findings · 3 harm
- Aug 29, 2024Complaint10 findings
- Jul 9, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Jun 12, 2024Complaint2 findings
- Mar 13, 2024Complaint6 findings
Show the 31 earlier surveys
- Dec 13, 2023Complaint10 findings
- Oct 24, 2023Complaint3 findings
- Sep 20, 2023Standard and complaint7 findings
- Aug 15, 2023Complaint1 finding
- May 25, 2023Complaint2 findings
- Feb 8, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Jan 5, 2023Complaint2 findings
- Sep 23, 2022Standard11 findings
- Sep 8, 2022Complaint3 findings
- Jul 29, 2021Standard1 finding
- Oct 29, 2020Complaint2 findings
- Jul 11, 2019Standard2 findings
- May 21, 2019Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Dec 20, 2018Complaint2 findings
- Jul 23, 2018Standard7 findings · 2 harm
- Feb 15, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Feb 7, 2017Complaint2 findings
- Dec 6, 2016Complaint1 finding
- Jun 9, 2016Standard2 findings
- Jun 19, 2014Standard2 findings
- Jul 2, 2013—9 findings
- May 1, 2013—3 findings
- Apr 4, 2013—4 findings
- Nov 15, 2012—5 findings
- Sep 12, 2012Standard6 findings
- Jan 6, 2012Complaint14 findings · 10 harm
- Oct 20, 2011—2 findings
- Oct 11, 2011—2 findings
- Jul 13, 2011—2 findings
- Mar 18, 2011—3 findings
- Feb 16, 2011—1 finding
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction