Deficiency Index

Pikeville Nursing and Rehab Center, LLC

Pikeville, Kentucky · CCN 185094

34 surveys since 2010, 28 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
117
Surveys
34
Harm or worse
28
Immediate jeopardy
21
The record, 2010–2026
’10’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy21

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file31/34

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
106
Ownership
For profit - Individual
Chain
EMERALD HEALTHCARE
County
Pike · rural
Medicare-certified since
1970

CMS ratings

Overall
3
Health inspection
3
Staffing
3
Quality measures
2

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=9, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Jan 8, 2026

305 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.063.59
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.67—
Annual nurse turnover22.9%45.6%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD1071.4%E428.6%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 14 of the 117 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Pikeville Nursing and Rehab Center, LLC, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Jan 8, 2026

    Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure that staff maintained the oven in a clean and sanitary condition and failed to allow serviceware to air dry before stacking for storage and/or use. This failure had the potential to affect all residents who received meals from the dietary department.Findings included: An undated facility policy titled, Manual Warewashing, indicated, All serviceware and cookware will be air dried prior to storage. A facility policy titled, Equipment, revised 09/2017, revealed, All foodservice equipment will be clean, sanitary, and in proper working order. The policy also revealed, 3. All food contact equipment will be cleaned and sanitized after every use. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880Jan 8, 2026

    Based on observation, interview, and facility policy and document review, the facility failed to fit test all staff annually for N95 respirators which had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure 2 (Certified Medication Aide [CMA] #5 and Registered Nurse [RN] #6) of 2 staff observed during medication administration followed infection control procedures when preparing medications.Findings included: 1. During an observation on 01/07/2026 at 8:41 AM, CMA #5 was observed preparing 45 milliliters (ml) of lactulose in two separate cups, one with 30 ml and the other with 15 ml then combining them into a six-ounce plastic cup. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF921Oct 30, 2024

    Based on observation, interview, review of the facility's job descriptions, review of the facility's policies, and food establishment inspection reports, it was determined the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff, and the public. Observations from 10/27/2024 through 10/30/2024, revealed blunt, metal plumbing protruding from the wall above the toilet in two bathrooms shared by four resident rooms, flooring was uneven in hallways, and resident bathrooms; lighting issues in resident bathrooms and the kitchen, odors permeating from the floor in resident bathrooms, leaking pipes from equipment in the kitchen, chipped and peeling paint/drywall in resident rooms as well as the kitchen, peeling paint on the floor in the kitchen,… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF550Jan 8, 2026

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was not pulled backwards in a geriatric chair to protect their dignity for 1 (Resident #65) of 1 resident reviewed for dignity.Findings included:A facility policy titled, Resident Rights 483.10, revised 01/2024, indicated, The resident has the right to be treated with respect and dignity.An admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #65 on 08/23/2000. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of cerebral palsy, unspecified intellectual disabilities, and cognitive communication deficit. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF600Jan 8, 2026

    Based on interview, record review, and facility document and policy review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical abuse by another resident for 1 (Resident #100) of 2 residents reviewed for abuse. Specifically, on 07/01/2025, staff heard Resident #99 yell at Resident #100 and saw Resident #100 holding their right shoulder/arm. Resident #99 reported that they hit Resident #100 on the arm.Findings included: An undated facility policy titled, Abuse Protection, indicated, 1. Each resident has the right to be free from abuse, corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion, neglect, and misappropriation of property. […]

Read 45 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 45 of 117 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jan 8, 2026Standard and complaint6 findings
  • Oct 30, 2024Standard3 findings
  • Dec 4, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 17, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 27, 2018Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
  • Jul 19, 2018Standard9 findings
  • Jul 11, 2018Complaint5 findings
  • Sep 7, 2017Complaint1 finding
Show the 26 earlier surveys
  • Jun 29, 2017Standard4 findings
  • Feb 28, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 10, 2017Complaint2 findings
  • Sep 15, 2016Complaint4 findings
  • Jul 13, 2016Standard3 findings
  • Feb 4, 2016Standard5 findings
  • Jan 14, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • May 7, 2015Complaint2 findings
  • Apr 24, 2015Standard and complaint13 findings · 6 harm
  • Jun 25, 2014Complaint5 findings · 5 harm
  • Jun 4, 2014Complaint4 findings · 4 harm
  • Apr 3, 2014Standard10 findings · 6 harm
  • Feb 25, 2014Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 3, 2013—1 finding
  • Nov 19, 2013—3 findings · 3 harm
  • May 23, 2013—1 finding
  • Apr 11, 2013—1 finding
  • Aug 8, 2012—1 finding
  • Jul 23, 2012—2 findings
  • Mar 20, 2012—1 finding
  • Feb 9, 2012—3 findings
  • Sep 1, 2011—5 findings · 2 harm
  • May 23, 2011—5 findings
  • Feb 11, 2011—2 findings
  • Dec 1, 2010—7 findings
  • Oct 5, 2010—2 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction