Deficiency Index

Physical Rehabilitation And Wellness Center Of Spa

Spartanburg, South Carolina · CCN 425175

27 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2016.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
123
Surveys
27
Harm or worse
10
Immediate jeopardy
7
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy7

Findings at the most serious level CMS records. 1 of these were recorded as past non-compliance — corrected before the survey.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file21/27

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
120
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
FUNDAMENTAL HEALTHCARE
County
Spartanburg
Medicare-certified since
1989

CMS ratings

Overall
1
Health inspection
1
Staffing
1
Quality measures
3

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 28 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in South Carolina.

Last survey on record

May 27, 2026

166 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.233.43
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.36—
Annual nurse turnover60.8%44.5%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$46,524 across 4 penalties
Abuse icon
Flagged by CMS on Care Compare

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ27.4%K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD2281.5%E13.7%F27.4%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 27 of the 123 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6893×

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

  • F8123×

    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

  • F6562×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

  • F5501×

    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.

  • F5581×

    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Physical Rehabilitation And Wellness Center Of Spa, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, patternF760Jan 19, 2023

    Based on review of the facility's policy, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to protect 18 of 25 residents from significant medication error. Facility failed to administer evening medication passes to Residents (R)1-R18 on 11/26/2022. Review of facility investigation and interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)1 confirmed that LPN1 failed to administer medication to an entire medication cart assignment. On 01/19/2023 at approximately 10 AM, the State Agency (SA) determined that the facility's non-compliance with one or more federal health, safety, and/or quality regulations has caused or was likely to cause serious injury, serious harm, serious impairment, or death. […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Feb 20, 2026

    Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident (R)1, who was on NPO (nothing by mouth) status, was adequately supervised to prevent the resident from receiving a cereal bar and a cup of water. Resulting in the resident experiencing symptoms of projectile vomiting and clamminess, which resulted in hospital transfer.On 02/19/26 at 03:45 PM, the State Agency (SA) determined that the facility's non-compliance with one or more federal health, safety, and/or quality regulations has caused or was likely to cause serious injury, serious harm, serious impairment, or death.On 02/20/26 at 09:35 AM, the Administrator was notified that failure to ensure a resident who was on NPO status was adequately supervised to prevent the resident from receiving a cereal bar and… […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF600Jan 16, 2026

    Based on facility policy review, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to protect the Resident (R)19's rights to be free from sexual abuse, from R79, for 1 of 7 residents reviewed for abuse. This failure had the likelihood of causing physical, mental, and psychosocial harm.On 01/14/26 at 3:45 PM, the Administrator and Director of Nursing (DON) were notified that the failure to protect a resident from sexual abuse constituted Immediate Jeopardy at F600.On 01/14/26 at 3:45 PM, the survey team provided the Administrator with a copy of the CMS IJ Template and informed the facility IJ existed as of 12/09/25. […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF600Nov 23, 2022

    Based on review of the facility policy, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure 3 of 3 Residents (R) were free from sexual abuse. R1 and R2 were involved in a sexual relationship without being properly assessed by the facility, proper documentation and notification. R2 and R8 was also involved in a sexual relationship without proper assessments, documentation, and notifications in place to prevent sexual abuse. On 11/22/22 at 3:45 PM, the State Agency (SA) determined that the facility's non-compliance with one or more federal health, safety, and/or quality regulations has caused or was likely to cause serious injury, serious harm, serious impairment, or death. […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF600Sep 22, 2022

    Based on observations, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse for 5 (Residents #248, #398, #75, #63, and #54) of 6 sampled residents reviewed for abuse. Specifically, the facility failed to prevent staff-to-resident verbal abuse for Resident #248 and failed to prevent resident-to-resident physical abuse for Resident #398, Resident #75, Resident #63, and Resident #54. Findings included: Review of a facility policy titled, Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, or Mistreatment, revised 11/01/2017, revealed, The facility's leadership prohibits neglect, mental, physical, and/or verbal abuse, use of a physical and/or chemical restraint not required to treat a medical condition, involuntary seclusion, corporal punishment and… […]

Read 28 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 28 of 123 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • May 27, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 20, 2026Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Jan 16, 2026Standard and complaint5 findings · 1 harm
  • Jan 29, 2025Complaint2 findings
  • Nov 26, 2024Standard14 findings
  • Mar 22, 2023Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • Jan 30, 2023Complaint2 findings
  • Jan 19, 2023Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
Show the 19 earlier surveys
  • Nov 23, 2022Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Sep 22, 2022Standard and complaint8 findings · 1 harm
  • Apr 6, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 4, 2021Standard8 findings
  • May 27, 2021Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
  • Apr 23, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 5, 2020Infection control3 findings
  • Jun 3, 2020Infection control2 findings
  • Dec 19, 2019Standard and complaint9 findings
  • Aug 30, 2018Standard11 findings
  • May 25, 2017Standard10 findings
  • Aug 4, 2016Standard9 findings
  • Apr 21, 2016Complaint3 findings · 2 harm
  • Oct 15, 2015Standard8 findings
  • May 18, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 26, 2014Standard7 findings
  • Dec 18, 2012—2 findings
  • Jan 30, 2012—2 findings
  • Nov 9, 2011—7 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction