Deficiency Index

Parkway Hills Nursing & Rehabilitation

La Mesa, California · CCN 055078

62 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2016.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
209
Surveys
62
Harm or worse
5
Immediate jeopardy
1
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy1

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file54/62

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
60
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
MADISON CREEK PARTNERS
County
San Diego
Medicare-certified since
1980

CMS ratings

Overall
3
Health inspection
3
Staffing
4
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 252 for-profit facilities with fewer than 66 beds in California.

Last survey on record

Apr 27, 2026

196 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.984.36
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.36—
Annual nurse turnover34.9%36.4%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD3262.7%E1529.4%F12.0%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B35.9%C—
CMS’s current file: 51 of the 209 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6564×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

  • F7613×

    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.

  • F8123×

    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

  • F8423×

    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.

  • F8803×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Parkway Hills Nursing & Rehabilitation, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF790Jun 9, 2023

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide timely dental services and referral for outside care and treatment for one of three residents (Resident 1). In addition, the facility failed to provide clinical oversight of the social services department to ensure that dental services were being provided. As a result, Resident 1 had experienced tooth pain which lasted for over five months, developed infection of teeth, and was unable to eat the food she enjoyed. Findings: A review of Resident 1 's Admission Record dated 5/8/23, indicated the resident had been admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include end stage heart failure and was receiving palliative care/hospice (comfort care). […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF600May 21, 2021

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect residents from abuse for one of one resident (Resident 1) reviewed for sexual abuse, when prior employment verification was not conducted on certified nursing assistant 5 (CNA 5) before hiring. As a result, Resident 1 alleged sexual abuse by CNA 5 and the resident complained of vaginal bleeding, pain, difficulty sleeping, and repeated nightmares. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], per the facility's Admission Record. On 1/13/20 at 2:35 P.M., a concurrent observation and interview with Resident 1 was conducted. Resident 1 was tearful and periodically stopped to cry while being interviewed. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF801Sep 24, 2025

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Dietary Manager (DM) had the required education or experience to effectively manage the Food Service department. This failure had the potential to place 52 residents at risk for foodborne illness. Cross reference: F806, F812, F813Findings: An interview was conducted with the DM on 9/22/25 at 9:45 A.M. The DM stated she had been employed as the DM for approximately 18 months. The DM stated she did not have a degree in food service management, or a Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) credential. The DM stated she did not have experience as a food service manager from any other facility. The DM stated she had been promoted into her current job by a previous manager. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF695Sep 24, 2025

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of three residents reviewed for oxygen therapy had:Oxygen saturation levels (the amount of oxygen in the blood) routinely monitored and documented (Resident 3), and,A physician's order for oxygen therapy was obtained prior to administration (Resident 7). These failures had the potential for Residents 3 and 7 to receive oxygen when it was not required, resulting in the possibility of dependency. Findings: 1. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF806Sep 24, 2025

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure alternate food items were of equal nutritive value. This failure had the potential to place residents at risk for nutritional deficits. Findings:An observation of the kitchen tray line was conducted on 9/23/25 starting at 11:20 A.M. Trays were being prepared for 52 residents for lunch. The following items were served or prepared during the tray line: 1. [NAME] (CK 2) removed a plastic-covered chef salad from the refrigerator, and placed the salad on a resident tray. The chef salad contained a hard boiled egg, lettuce, cheese, turkey and ham. 2. CK 2 prepared a sandwich from two pieces of white bread and two slices of what appeared to be American cheese. […]

Read 25 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 25 of 209 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Apr 27, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 9, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 24, 2025Standard14 findings
  • Aug 23, 2024Standard15 findings
  • Aug 1, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 8, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 5, 2024Complaint2 findings
  • Jun 9, 2023Complaint5 findings · 1 harm
Show the 54 earlier surveys
  • May 1, 2023Complaint3 findings
  • Sep 28, 2022Complaint3 findings
  • Sep 12, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 16, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 8, 2022Complaint2 findings
  • Jan 25, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 17, 2021Standard16 findings
  • Sep 29, 2021Complaint2 findings
  • Jun 14, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • May 21, 2021Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • Mar 1, 2021Complaint4 findings
  • Jan 20, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 9, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 15, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 5, 2020Complaint2 findings
  • Mar 3, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 11, 2019Complaint3 findings
  • Nov 21, 2019Standard10 findings
  • May 15, 2019Complaint2 findings
  • Apr 4, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 6, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 18, 2018Complaint6 findings
  • Nov 8, 2018Standard7 findings
  • Nov 2, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 10, 2017Standard11 findings · 2 harm
  • Oct 4, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 31, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 3, 2017Complaint6 findings
  • Aug 1, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 14, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 25, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 19, 2016Standard5 findings
  • Aug 9, 2016Complaint3 findings
  • Jun 3, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 2, 2016Complaint2 findings
  • May 31, 2016Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • May 24, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • May 11, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 30, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 2, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 9, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 1, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 18, 2015Standard18 findings
  • Aug 13, 2015Complaint3 findings
  • Aug 5, 2015Complaint2 findings
  • Oct 23, 2014Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 9, 2014Standard6 findings
  • Apr 8, 2014Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 31, 2013—2 findings
  • Oct 25, 2013—9 findings
  • Mar 5, 2013—1 finding
  • Nov 16, 2012—9 findings
  • Sep 21, 2012—2 findings
  • Dec 8, 2011—2 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction