Deficiency Index

Parkside Nursing and Rehabilitation Center

Fairfield, Ohio · CCN 365363

43 surveys since 2010, 7 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
176
Surveys
43
Harm or worse
7
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2010–2025
’10’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse7

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file38/43

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
76
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
EMBASSY HEALTHCARE
County
Butler
Medicare-certified since
1978

CMS ratings

Overall
3
Health inspection
2
Staffing
2
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 391 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in Ohio.

Last survey on record

Jul 31, 2025

466 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.523.47
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.53—
Annual nurse turnover48.4%49.2%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$36,550 across 1 penalty

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG25.9%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD2573.5%E411.8%F38.8%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 34 of the 176 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F5503×

    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.

  • F6572×

    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.

  • F6842×

    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

  • F6862×

    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.

  • F8122×

    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Parkside Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF686Jul 31, 2025

    Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, review of the facility policy, and review of online guidelines per the National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (NPUAP), the facility failed to implement treatment once the pressure ulcers were identified. This resulted in Actual Harm for Resident #34, who was admitted to the facility without pressure ulcers and developed pressure ulcers to her right antecubital and left antecubital space (inside of the elbows), which were not identified and treated until they had developed into stage IV ulcers with exposed tendon. This affected one (Resident #34) of five residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 67 residents. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF686Aug 1, 2023

    Based on record review, observation, staff interview, review of facility policy, and review of guidelines from the National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (NPUAP), the facility failed to thoroughly assess the resident's skin and failed to timely identify a resident's pressure ulcer until it reached an advanced stage which resulted in actual harm to Resident #44 who developed an unstageable pressure ulcer to the left flank which required sharp debridement. The facility also failed to develop and implement a care plan to prevent skin breakdown which placed the resident (#74) at risk for more than potential harm that was not actual harm. This affected two (Residents #44 and #74) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 73. Findings include: 1. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF700Apr 3, 2023

    Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, review of hospital records, review of the Food and Drug Administration's guidelines, review of manufacturer's guidelines, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents were assessed for appropriateness of bed rail use prior to the installation of bed rails. The facility also failed to assess bed rails for possible areas of entrapment. This resulted in actual harm for one (#14) of three residents reviewed for bed rails when the facility installed grab bars to the resident's bed without conducting an assessment for their use and failed to assess the rails for entrapment risk. The resident subsequently had a fall from bed in which his head became stuck between the mattress and the grab bar. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Jul 31, 2025

    Based on observation, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to store, prepare, and serve food in a sanitary manner and the facility failed to properly store potentially hazardous cleaning agents away from food preparation areas. This had the potential to affect all residents who receive food from the kitchen. The facility identified ten (Residents #1, #5, #15, #16, #35, #38, #46, #53, #64, #84) who do not receive food from the kitchen. The facility census was 67 residents. Findings include: 1.Observation during the initial tour of the kitchen on 07/21/25 at 8:50 A.M. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880Jul 31, 2025

    Based on record review, review of the facility's Legionella Water Management Plan, observation of hot water tank temperatures, staff interview, and review of the facility legionella mission statement, the facility failed to ensure implementation and maintenance of the legionella water management plan. This had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The facility census was 67 residents.Findings include: Review of a facility document titled Legionella Water Management Plan undated revealed water entered the facility from the local public water supply and was stored in five holding tanks that were heated by natural gas and/or electricity. There was a tank in a storage room located adjacent to the kitchen that supplied hot water only to the kitchen. […]

Read 26 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 26 of 176 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jul 31, 2025Standard and complaint17 findings · 1 harm
  • Feb 8, 2024Complaint3 findings
  • Aug 1, 2023Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • Apr 3, 2023Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Jan 5, 2023Complaint2 findings
  • Jul 29, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 27, 2022Standard and complaint6 findings
  • Aug 6, 2021Complaint2 findings
Show the 35 earlier surveys
  • Mar 4, 2021Infection control1 finding
  • Nov 17, 2020Infection control3 findings
  • Sep 16, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Dec 18, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 14, 2019Standard and complaint6 findings
  • Jun 11, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 10, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 26, 2019Complaint3 findings
  • Jan 29, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 11, 2018Standard6 findings
  • Jun 23, 2018Complaint2 findings
  • Jun 5, 2018Complaint2 findings
  • May 17, 2018Complaint10 findings · 1 harm
  • Apr 24, 2018Complaint2 findings
  • Sep 26, 2017Complaint2 findings
  • Sep 19, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 9, 2017Complaint2 findings
  • Aug 24, 2017Standard and complaint8 findings
  • Feb 9, 2017Complaint5 findings
  • Dec 29, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 23, 2016Standard9 findings · 1 harm
  • Apr 15, 2016Complaint2 findings
  • Jan 14, 2016Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Oct 26, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 13, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 26, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 23, 2015Standard and complaint7 findings
  • Sep 10, 2014Complaint3 findings
  • Jan 9, 2014—4 findings
  • Oct 15, 2013—2 findings
  • Sep 20, 2012—31 findings · 1 harm
  • Jun 3, 2011—10 findings
  • Mar 9, 2011—2 findings
  • Jan 6, 2011—3 findings
  • Mar 18, 2010—6 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction