Deficiency Index

Park Vista at Morningside

Fullerton, California · CCN 555515

25 surveys since 2010. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2014.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
168
Surveys
25
Harm or worse
4
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2010–2025
’10’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse4

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file20/25

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
99
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
CONTINUING LIFE
County
Orange
Medicare-certified since
1992

CMS ratings

Overall
4
Health inspection
3
Staffing
4
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded fewer weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 423 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in California.

Last survey on record

Dec 9, 2025

335 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day5.524.16
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.73—
Annual nurse turnover38.2%37.5%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$8,425 across 1 penalty

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG12.2%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD3066.7%E36.7%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B1124.4%C—
CMS’s current file: 45 of the 168 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6954×

    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.

  • F7613×

    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.

  • F8123×

    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

  • F8803×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

  • F7552×

    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Park Vista at Morningside, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Sep 16, 2025

    Based on observation, interview, medical record review, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 4) reviewed for safety was free from accident/hazards. * The facility failed to ensure Residents 4 was evaluated to handle and consume hot beverages as per the facility's P&P. In addition, Residents 8 and 9 were also not evaluated to handle and consume hot beverages. * RNAs 1 and 2 failed to notify a licensed nurse immediately after Resident 4 spilled hot tea onto her lap. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 4 was provided the immediate and appropriate interventions when Resident 4 spilled hot tea to her left upper thigh. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF880Dec 9, 2025

    Based on interview, medical record review, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to maintain the infection control practices to help prevent the development and transmission of diseases and infection. * The facility failed to maintain an accurate infection control surveillance log and match the data in the QA infection control for June, July, September, and October 2025. * The facility failed to ensure the infection control practices were implemented in the facility's laundry room. * The facility failed to ensure the EBPs were followed for Resident 55 when the RNA 1 did not wear the appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) before providing care to the resident. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Dec 5, 2024

    Based on observation, interview, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the sanitary requirements were met in the kitchen. * The facility failed to ensure proper labeling and dating of foods in the kitchen. * The facility failed to ensure proper labeling and dating of foods in the refrigerator used for residents' food brought in by visitors and expired foods were discarded. * The facility failed to ensure the foods were stored off the floor. * The facility failed to ensure the plate lowerator (adjustable heated plate dispenser), can opener, kitchen microwave, oven, and warmer were clean. * The facility failed to ensure the egg salad was not stored on the shelf containing raw meats. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Apr 21, 2023

    Based on observation, interview, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the sanitary requirements were met in the kitchen. * The facility failed to ensure proper labeling and dating of foods in the kitchen * The facility failed to ensure proper labeling and dating of foods in the refrigerator used for residents' food brought in by visitors. In addition, the facility failed to ensure the foods stored in the refrigerator belonged to the residents and not the staff, and expired foods were discarded. * The facility failed to ensure the foods were stored off the floor. * The facility failed to ensure a proper sanitary condition of the ice machine. * The facility failed to ensure the plate lowerator (adjustable heated plate dispenser) and resident refrigerator were clean. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF686Dec 9, 2025

    Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the necessary care and services were provided to prevent the development of new pressure injury (areas of damaged skin caused by staying in one position for a long time which reduces blood flow to the area and causes the skin to die and develop a sore) and promote healing of the existing pressure ulcer for one of two final sampled residents (Resident 55) reviewed for pressure injury. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 55's pressure injury was evaluated regularly. * The DSD/IP failed to ensure to follow the physician's order to cleanse Resident 55's pressure injury with normal saline during wound care observation. […]

Read 23 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 23 of 168 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Dec 9, 2025Standard14 findings
  • Sep 16, 2025Complaint5 findings · 1 harm
  • Dec 5, 2024Standard18 findings
  • Mar 13, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 21, 2023Standard7 findings
  • Feb 23, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 18, 2020Standard8 findings
  • Feb 4, 2020Complaint1 finding
Show the 17 earlier surveys
  • Mar 5, 2019Standard and complaint11 findings · 1 harm
  • Aug 2, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 9, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 9, 2018Standard7 findings
  • Mar 21, 2017Standard14 findings
  • Mar 24, 2016Standard10 findings
  • Aug 14, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • May 29, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 2, 2015Standard11 findings
  • Nov 5, 2014Complaint2 findings
  • Aug 1, 2014Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 25, 2014Standard16 findings · 2 harm
  • May 28, 2013—1 finding
  • Feb 26, 2013—1 finding
  • Feb 13, 2013—9 findings
  • Mar 13, 2012—8 findings
  • Dec 9, 2010—18 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction