Deficiency Index

Park Place

Selma, Alabama · CCN 015084

9 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2021.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
32
Surveys
9
Harm or worse
2
Immediate jeopardy
2
The record, 2011–2022
’11’15’20’22
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy2

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file6/9

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
103
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
DIVERSICARE HEALTHCARE
County
Dallas · rural
Medicare-certified since
1979

CMS ratings

Overall
3
Health inspection
2
Staffing
3
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=7, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Apr 6, 2022

1,678 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.393.73
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.39—
Annual nurse turnover28.4%51.3%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD981.8%E—F218.2%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 11 of the 32 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Park Place, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF760Oct 22, 2021

    Based on interviews, review of Resident Identifier (RI) #1's medical records, Potter and Perry's FUNDAMENTALS OF NURSING NINTH EDITION, and the facility's policy titled, Medication Errors, the facility failed to ensure RI #1, a kidney transplant resident taking anti-rejection medication, received [MEDICATION(S)] Anhydrous (an anti-rejection medication) from [DATE]-[DATE]. RI #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] from a local hospital. The transfer medication list from the hospital, listed [MEDICATION(S)] Anhydrous 0. 5 mg (milligrams) three tablets twice a day as a medication to be continued. […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF842Oct 22, 2021

    Based on interviews and review of Resident Identifier (RI) #1's medical records, Potter and Perry's FUNDAMENTALS OF NURSING NINTH EDITION, the facility's policy titled, New/Re-Admit physician's orders [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . As a result of this deficient practice, RI #1 did not receive the ordered medication during his/her stay at the facility from 5/21/2021-6/01/2021 and suffered a significant medication error. RI #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] from a local hospital. The transfer medication list from the hospital listed [MEDICATION(S)] Anhydrous 0.5 mg three tablets twice a day as a medication to be continued. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF868Apr 6, 2022

    Based on interviews and review of a document titled, [Facility Name] QAPI [Quality Assurance Performance Improvement] Plan, the facility failed to ensure the QAPI committee was composed of the required committee members. Specifically, the facility failed to provide evidence that a Medical Director (MD) or designee participated as a required QAPI committee member at least quarterly. Findings include: A review of the [Facility Name] QAPI Plan, dated 02/2017, revealed that QAPI membership included the MD, Administrator, and the Director of Nursing at a minimum. A review of the facility's QAPI Meeting sign-in sheets revealed an MD had not signed as present during a meeting since 07/16/2021. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF637Apr 6, 2022

    Based on record review, interviews, and review of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive Significant Change in Status Minimum Data Set (MDS) was completed within fourteen days of Resident Identifier (RI) #55's discharge from hospice services. This affected RI #55, one of one resident reviewed for hospice services. Findings include: Review of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual revealed the following: .CH (Chapter) 3: MDS Items [A] . […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF758Apr 6, 2022

    Based on interviews, record review, and review of a policy titled, [CONDITION(S)] Medication Use, the facility failed to attempt a gradual dose reduction (GDR) for Resident Identifier (RI) #90, one of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings included: A review of the [CONDITION(S)] Medication Use policy, dated 12/01/2007, revealed, .Facility should ensure that the ordering physician reviews the medication plan and considers a GDR of [CONDITION(S)] medications for the purpose of finding the lowest effective dose unless a GDR is clinically contraindicated. Physician should document the clinical rationale for why any additional attempted dose reduction at that time would be likely to impair the resident's function or increase distressed behavior . […]

Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 32 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Apr 6, 2022Standard and complaint5 findings
  • Oct 22, 2021Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
  • Sep 10, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • May 16, 2019Standard and complaint6 findings
  • May 17, 2018Standard2 findings
  • Mar 17, 2016Standard6 findings
  • Feb 5, 2015Standard7 findings
  • Sep 6, 2013—1 finding
Show the 1 earlier survey
  • Sep 1, 2011—2 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction