Deficiency Index

Park Manor of Tomball

Tomball, Texas · CCN 676165

35 surveys since 2010. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2017.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
113
Surveys
35
Harm or worse
4
Immediate jeopardy
2
The record, 2010–2026
’10’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy2

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file30/35

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
125
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
HMG HEALTHCARE
County
Harris
Medicare-certified since
2008

CMS ratings

Overall
2
Health inspection
2
Staffing
1
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 377 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in Texas.

Last survey on record

Mar 26, 2026

228 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.203.25
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.20—
Annual nurse turnover47.3%54.0%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$14,069 across 1 penalty

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ27.1%K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD1450.0%E932.1%F13.6%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B13.6%C13.6%
CMS’s current file: 28 of the 113 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F7553×

    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.

  • F7613×

    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.

  • F6562×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

  • F6842×

    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

  • F8122×

    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Park Manor of Tomball, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF580Jun 9, 2025

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to consult with the resident's physician when there was a significant change in the resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial status (that is, a deterioration in health, mental, or psychosocial status in either life-threatening conditions or clinical complications); for 1 of 4 residents (CR #1) when reviewed for quality of care. 1. The facility failed to notify CR#1's physician at 7 am when he had blurry vision, increased heart rate, shortness of breath, and his O2 levels dropped below baseline. 2. The first attempt at contact was made by text at 8:17 am but the NP did not respond until 9:30 am. […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF684Jun 9, 2025

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure based on the comprehensive assessment of a resident, that resident received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's choices for 2 of 4 residents (CR #1, CR#2) reviewed for quality of care. 1. The facility failed to notify CR#1's physician at 7 am when he had blurry vision, increased heart rate, shortness of breath, and his O2 levels dropped below baseline. 2. The first attempt at contact was made by text at 8:17 am but the NP did not respond until 9:30 am. CR#1 was transported to the hospital at 10am on 06/02/25, 3 hours after chief complaints of shortness of breath and unsuccessful interventions. 3. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF727Nov 16, 2023

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to use the services of a registered nurse for at least 8 consecutive hours a day 7 days a week from 10/2/2023 to 10/7/2023, 10/9/2023 to 10/13/2023, 10/15/2023 to 10/31/2023 and 11/1/2023 to 11/16/2023. The facility had no DON from 9/29/2023 to 10/10/2023. These failures placed the residents at risk for not having decisions made that would have required an RN to make in the management of the resident's healthcare needs and in managing and monitoring of the direct care staff. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880Jan 18, 2022

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 11(CNA A, CNA C, CNA D, CNA E, CNA F, Scheduler, Receptionist, Screener, LVN A, PTA A and Infection Preventionist) of 12 staff and 3 ( Family Member #1, Family Member #2 and Family #3) of 4 family members reviewed for infection control The facility failed to ensure staff to wear appropriate PPE while the facility was in outbreak status across 3 different on-site visits (12/16/21, 12/30/21 and 01/18/22) for CNA A, CNA C, CNA D, CNA E, CNA F, Scheduler, Receptionist, Screener, LVN A, PTA A and Infection… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF804Jul 23, 2021

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide food that was palatable, and served at a safe and appetizing temperature for one of one kitchen reviewed for dietary services. The facility served food that was cold, unpalatable, and repetative. This failure could place residents at risk of weight loss, altered nutritional status, and diminished quality of life. Findings Include: In a confidential group meeting on 07/21/21 at 09:27 AM, 7 out of 8 residents who attended complained about the food. They stated the Council had invited the dietary supervisor to the Resident Council Meetings and they attended, but it didn't help. They still had concerns about the food. […]

Read 22 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 22 of 113 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Mar 26, 2026Standard7 findings
  • Nov 24, 2025Complaint5 findings
  • Jun 9, 2025Complaint3 findings · 2 harm
  • Dec 12, 2024Standard and complaint3 findings
  • Nov 16, 2023Standard10 findings
  • Jan 12, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 15, 2022Standard7 findings
  • Mar 11, 2022Complaint1 finding
Show the 27 earlier surveys
  • Mar 8, 2022Infection control1 finding
  • Feb 14, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 18, 2022Complaint2 findings
  • Dec 8, 2021Complaint2 findings
  • Jul 23, 2021Standard4 findings
  • Apr 30, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 27, 2019Standard5 findings
  • Nov 13, 2018Complaint2 findings
  • Oct 16, 2018Complaint2 findings
  • Sep 21, 2018Standard3 findings
  • Apr 18, 2018Complaint2 findings
  • Nov 7, 2017Complaint4 findings · 2 harm
  • Oct 19, 2017Standard8 findings
  • Jul 19, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 21, 2017Complaint2 findings
  • Oct 29, 2015Standard3 findings
  • Jun 9, 2015Complaint2 findings
  • Nov 14, 2014Standard3 findings
  • Oct 15, 2014Complaint2 findings
  • Feb 18, 2014Complaint2 findings
  • Oct 31, 2013—7 findings
  • Dec 13, 2012—1 finding
  • Nov 1, 2012—7 findings
  • Aug 16, 2012—1 finding
  • Nov 17, 2011—2 findings
  • Oct 7, 2010—5 findings
  • Sep 22, 2010—1 finding

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction