Park Forest Care Center LLC
Westminster, Colorado · CCN 06A172
24 surveys since 2010, 12 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 139
- Surveys
- 24
- Harm or worse
- 12
- Immediate jeopardy
- 6
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 103
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Adams
- Medicare-certified since
- 1991
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 1
- Health inspection
- 1
- Staffing
- 1
- Quality measures
- 1
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 48 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in Colorado.
Last survey on record
Jul 7, 2026
125 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 2.61 | 3.30 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.32 | — |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $16,146 across 1 penalty
- Abuse icon
- Flagged by CMS on Care Compare
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L13.0% |
| Actual harm | G39.1% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1751.5% | E721.2% | F39.1% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C26.1% |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6004×
Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
- F6893×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
- F7603×
Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
- F6442×
Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
- F6882×
Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Park Forest Care Center LLC, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, widespreadF600Dec 31, 2024
Based on record review, observation, and interviews, the facility failed to create an environment that protected the right of eight (#1, #2 #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8) of eight residents reviewed for abuse out of eight sample residents to be free from abuse. The facility's failure contributed to repeated incidents of abuse and actual harm. Record review and interview revealed Resident #1, under age 35, was blind, nonverbal, non-interviewable, severely cognitively impaired, and dependent on care. On 10/14/24 at 9:39 a.m., a housekeeper observed Resident #2 sexually abusing Resident #1 in her bed. Resident #1 had blood in her incontinence brief and was actively bleeding. […]
- Immediate jeopardy, patternF600Jun 10, 2021
Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to protect six residents (#63, #26, #30, #37, #18, and #6) of nine residents reviewed, from neglect and abuse out of 48 sample residents. NEGLECT The facility failed to provide services - implementation and monitoring of its plan to address a known rodent infestation, resulting in resident fear, disgust and actual injury. Specifically: According to the Department's records, the facility recognized rodents were entering the facility through the crawl space in late April and indicated it had a plan to address this concern. […]
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF693Jun 10, 2021
Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to have an effective system in place to ensure two or four residents reviewed (#45 and #35) out of seven residents, received the appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications of enteral feeding, such as aspiration pneumonia, diarrhea, vomiting, dehydration, metabolic abnormalities, and nasal-pharyngeal ulcers. Specifically: Record review and observations on 6/2/21 at 9:20 a.m., 6/3/21 at 9:30 a.m., and 6/7/21 at 10:12 a.m., revealed the facility failed to follow facility policy, standards of practice, care plan directives and physician orders [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . -Resident #45 had a history of [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF600Feb 9, 2026
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (#11) of three residents reviewed for feeding tube out of 22 sample residents received necessary care and services to remain free from neglect. Resident #11 was nonverbal and dependent on staff for nutrition and hydration through a gastrostomy tube (G-tube). The resident was unable to communicate needs, discomfort, or hunger and relied entirely on staff to provide ordered tube feeding. The physician's orders revealed the resident required continuous enteral feeding with scheduled water flushes to meet the resident's nutritional and hydration needs.On 1/28/26, the resident's tube feeding was not administered beginning at 4:00 p.m. until 6:00 a.m. on 1/29/26. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Feb 9, 2026
Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure two (#5 and #2) of seven residents reviewed for accidents out of 22 sample residents received adequate supervision to prevent accidents. Resident #5 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left dominant side, vascular dementia, unspecified severity, with other behavioral disturbance and unspecified symptoms and signs involving cognitive functions and awareness.Resident #5 was identified as a high fall risk. On 12/25/25, Resident #5 sustained an unwitnessed fall. On 12/29/25, the resident sustained an additional unwitnessed fall. The facility recommended implementing a communication board due to the resident's difficult communication. […]
Read 28 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 28 of 139 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jul 7, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Feb 9, 2026Complaint4 findings · 2 harm
- Jun 3, 2025Standard7 findings
- Dec 31, 2024Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
- Nov 30, 2023Standard7 findings · 1 harm
- Aug 23, 2022Standard and complaint11 findings
- Apr 21, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Oct 28, 2021Complaint2 findings
Show the 16 earlier surveys
- Jun 10, 2021Standard18 findings · 3 harm
- Aug 3, 2020Infection control5 findings · 3 harm
- May 8, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Feb 6, 2020Complaint1 finding
- Sep 26, 2019Complaint6 findings
- Jun 6, 2019Standard8 findings · 1 harm
- Mar 8, 2018Standard11 findings
- Dec 20, 2017Complaint2 findings
- Oct 12, 2016Standard9 findings
- Sep 21, 2015Standard3 findings
- Oct 7, 2014Complaint4 findings
- Jul 16, 2014Standard and complaint5 findings
- Aug 8, 2013—3 findings
- Sep 27, 2012—12 findings
- Sep 21, 2011—13 findings
- Dec 14, 2010—2 findings · 1 harm
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction