Deficiency Index

Paradigm at Sweeny

Sweeny, Texas · CCN 675344

29 surveys since 2010. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2019.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
106
Surveys
29
Harm or worse
8
Immediate jeopardy
4
The record, 2010–2026
’10’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy4

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file21/29

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
90
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
PARADIGM HEALTHCARE
County
Brazoria
Medicare-certified since
1994

CMS ratings

Overall
1
Health inspection
1
Staffing
1
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 164 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in Texas.

Last survey on record

Jul 1, 2026

131 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day2.893.22
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.63—
Annual nurse turnover75.0%53.9%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$50,189 across 2 penalties
Abuse icon
Flagged by CMS on Care Compare

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ29.1%K29.1%L—
Actual harmG14.5%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD940.9%E836.4%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 22 of the 106 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6562×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

  • F8122×

    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

  • F8802×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

  • F5801×

    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.

  • F5821×

    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Paradigm at Sweeny, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, patternF600Jul 4, 2025

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure two residents (Resident #59 and Resident #60) of five residents reviewed for abuse and neglect were free from abuse.The facility failed to address inappropriate sexual behavior between Resident #59 and Resident #60. Resident #59 had a diagnosis which included Dementia and Resident #60 had a diagnosis which included Alzheimers.The facility failed to immediately implement the Psychology NP's recommendation to move Resident #60 off of the unit. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on 6/14/2025. The IJ template was provided to the facility on 6/14/2025 at 3:35 p.m. […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, patternF656Jul 4, 2025

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet the residents' medical, nursing, and mental and psychological needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment for 3 residents (Resident #31, Resident #59, and Resident #60) of 8 residents reviewed for care plans. -Resident #31's Care Plan did not include interventions and services to appropriately address the resident's behavior of placing inedible objects in her mouth.-Resident #59's Care Plan was not updated to include interventions and services to appropriately address inappropriate sexual behavior.-Resident #59 had delusional thoughts that Resident #60 was her husband.-Resident #60's… […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF686Jul 1, 2026

    Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident with pressure ulcers receives necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection and prevent new ulcers from developing for 1 (CR#1) of 7 residents reviewed. The facility failed to initiate wound preventative measures on [DATE] when CR#1 readmitted to the facility leading to infection and hospitalization. The facility failed to assess and recognize a change in condition and initiate wound preventative measures of [DATE] when the facility became aware that CR#1 had redness on her sacrum area during weekly skin observation leading to infection and hospitalization. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on [DATE]. […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Jul 4, 2025

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident's environment remained free of accident hazards for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #31) reviewed for accident hazards.The facility failed to adequately supervise Resident #31 when she ingested plastic wrap from a container while being monitored by CMA H during dining.An IJ was identified on 07/03/35 at 1:22 PM. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 1:22 PM. While the IJ was removed on 07/04/25, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated and a severity of no actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm because all staff had not been trained on accidents and supervision.This failure could place residents at risk for injury, harm, and impairment. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF580Dec 14, 2023

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to immediately consult with the resident's physician of a significant change in the resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial status (that is, a deterioration in health, mental, or psychosocial status in either life-threatening conditions or clinical complications) for 1 (Resident #1) of 5 residents reviewed for resident rights. -The facility failed to immediately notify Resident #1's physician when Resident #1 had an unwitnessed fall related to a syncopal episode due to pulse in the 40's . This failure placed residents at risk of not receiving appropriate care and/or interventions. […]

Read 22 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 22 of 106 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jul 1, 2026Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • May 11, 2026Complaint2 findings
  • Jul 4, 2025Standard6 findings · 3 harm
  • Jun 4, 2024Complaint3 findings
  • Mar 21, 2024Standard5 findings
  • Mar 8, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 14, 2023Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Apr 20, 2023Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
Show the 21 earlier surveys
  • Feb 24, 2023Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Feb 2, 2023Standard3 findings
  • Nov 9, 2021Standard2 findings
  • Sep 5, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 28, 2019Standard and complaint11 findings · 1 harm
  • Feb 22, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 29, 2018Standard6 findings
  • Aug 8, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 20, 2017Standard5 findings
  • May 17, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 9, 2016Standard3 findings
  • Jan 22, 2016Complaint2 findings
  • Aug 7, 2015Standard2 findings
  • Aug 27, 2014Standard8 findings
  • May 1, 2014Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 1, 2013—13 findings
  • Jan 15, 2013—1 finding
  • Aug 15, 2012—8 findings
  • Jun 18, 2012—1 finding
  • Aug 11, 2011—12 findings
  • Dec 8, 2010—2 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction