Deficiency Index

Palisade Healthcare Center

Garretson, South Dakota · CCN 435115

24 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2016.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
121
Surveys
24
Harm or worse
20
Immediate jeopardy
7
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy7

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file14/24

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
55
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
EVERGREEN HEALTHCARE GROUP
County
Minnehaha
Medicare-certified since
1998

CMS ratings

Overall
1
Health inspection
1
Staffing
2
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 18 for-profit facilities with fewer than 66 beds in South Dakota.

Last survey on record

Apr 16, 2026

207 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.163.20
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.54—
Annual nurse turnover60.0%43.9%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$249,546 across 5 penalties
Abuse icon
Flagged by CMS on Care Compare

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ13.4%K—L—
Actual harmG310.3%H13.4%I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD1344.8%E931.0%F26.9%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 29 of the 121 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6573×

    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.

  • F6583×

    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.

  • F8803×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

  • F6002×

    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.

  • F6892×

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Palisade Healthcare Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF684Nov 19, 2025

    Based on South Dakota Department of Health (SD DOH) complaint intake report review, record review, interview, and policy review, the provider failed to ensure staff provided quality care related to skin injury prevention and skin management processes including completing skin evaluations, accurate communication, accurate documentation, and implementing interventions and treatment orders for one of one sampled resident (1) who developed skin injuries to his left lower leg, left foot, and right lower leg and was hospitalized related to those wounds. Those failures put all residents at potential risk for serious injury or harm. […]

  • Actual harm, patternF600Apr 16, 2026

    Based on the South Dakota Department of Health (SD DOH) facility-reported incident (FRI), record review, document review, observation, interview, and policy review, the provider failed to protect the resident's right to be free from neglect for three of three sampled residents (1, 2, and 3) whose incontinence (involuntary urine or bowel leakage) products were not changed timely and the residents were not repositioned per leadership expectations by three of three CNAs (C, E, and P), for one of one sampled resident (4) who reported an unidentified staff member did not change resident 4 for a long period of time and he developed skin irritation and open sores to his perineal area, from abuse for one of one sampled resident (3) whose perineal area (genital area) was cleaned roughly by one of… […]

  • Actual harm, patternF584Aug 25, 2021

    A. Based on observation, interview, record review, testing, resident group meeting interview, and policy review, the provider failed to maintain a comfortable room temperature for fifteen random residents (1, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12, 13, 15, 17, 21, 24, 25, 35, 36, and 37) Findings include: Surveyor: 1. Review of the resident council minutes on: *4/5/21 documentation for maintenance/housekeeping/laundry department A/C's [air conditioners] in rooms. *5/10/21 documentation for maintenance/housekeeping/laundry department No window AC's. *6/25/21 documentation for other No air conditioning - explained doors open, air comes thru [through] halls - if windows open, then doors need to be shut. *7/12/21 documentation for maintenance Discussed air conditioning protocol thru out [throughout] the building. […]

  • Actual harm, patternF678Aug 25, 2021

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the provider failed to ensure the following: *One of one resident (30) who was of full code status received interventions to prevent his death. *Residents who were cognitively impaired understood what their code status entailed. *Registered nurse (RN) E was aware of which residents were full code and where the crash cart was located. *Code status book was updated with the most current code statuses of residents. Findings include: 1. Observation and interview on [DATE] at 9:09 a.m. RN E revealed: *She was the nurse in charge of the 100 and 200 hallway, that day. *Surveyor asked which residents were full code status. -She said she knew of one for sure. *They kept the code status' in the nurses station in a book. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Sep 17, 2025

    Based on South Dakota Department of Health (SD DOH) facility-reported incident (FRI) review, observation, interview, record review, and manufacturer's operator's instructions review, the provider failed to ensure:*The safety of one of one sampled resident (1) who fell from a total body lift (a mechanical lift and sling used to lift a person's full body) and sustained a hematoma (an injury that causes a localized collection of blood under the skin) while being transferred by one of one licensed practical nurse (LPN) (C) and one of one certified medication aide/certified nursing assistant (CMA/CNA) (F).*The sling sizes for eight of eight sampled residents (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8) who used a total body lift for transfers were assigned according to the sling's manufacturer's instructions. […]

Read 35 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 35 of 121 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Apr 16, 2026Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
  • Nov 19, 2025Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Sep 17, 2025Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Aug 7, 2025Standard and complaint7 findings · 1 harm
  • Mar 12, 2025Complaint2 findings
  • Nov 26, 2024Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • Aug 7, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 18, 2024Standard8 findings
Show the 16 earlier surveys
  • Dec 28, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 8, 2023Standard3 findings
  • Feb 8, 2022Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Aug 25, 2021Standard15 findings · 3 harm
  • Feb 1, 2021Infection control1 finding
  • Mar 12, 2019Standard3 findings
  • Feb 22, 2018Standard3 findings
  • Jul 10, 2017Complaint7 findings · 4 harm
  • Dec 7, 2016Standard23 findings · 7 harm
  • Aug 24, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 18, 2016Standard7 findings
  • Oct 27, 2015Complaint2 findings
  • Feb 26, 2015Standard14 findings
  • Feb 5, 2014—4 findings
  • Dec 19, 2012—6 findings
  • Oct 26, 2011—5 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction