Deficiency Index

Owsley County Health Care Center, Inc.

Booneville, Kentucky · CCN 185273

21 surveys since 2011, 10 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
70
Surveys
21
Harm or worse
10
Immediate jeopardy
7
The record, 2011–2022
’11’15’20’22
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy7

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file19/21

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
91
Ownership
Non profit - Corporation
Chain
Independent
County
Owsley · rural
Medicare-certified since
1991

CMS ratings

Overall
4
Health inspection
5
Staffing
4
Quality measures
1

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=4, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Jan 7, 2022

1,767 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.084.04
Registered-nurse hours per resident day1.17—
Annual nurse turnover28.4%43.5%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD666.7%E—F222.2%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C111.1%
CMS’s current file: 9 of the 70 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Owsley County Health Care Center, Inc., in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF625Jan 7, 2022

    Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to provide written notice to the resident and resident's representative at the time of transfer for hospitalization s that specified the duration of the bed-hold policy for two (2) of five (5) sampled residents (Resident #46 and #37). The findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Resident Bed Hold, dated 06/08/2021, revealed the facility would follow regulatory guidance for bed hold procedure. 1. Record review revealed the facility admitted Resident #37 on 09/30/2019, with diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF644Jan 7, 2022

    Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to complete a Level II Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) for two (2) of three (3) sampled residents. (Resident #43 and Resident #15). Resident #43 was diagnosed with Major Depressive Disorder on 09/06/2021 and Resident #43 was diagnosed with Moderate Major Depressive Disorder on 08/06/2020; however, the facility failed to ensure a Level II PASARR assessment was completed. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF689Sep 22, 2021

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and a review of the facility policy, it was determined the facility failed to ensue one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident #1) received adequate supervision to prevent accidents. On 09/05/2021, Resident #1, who was cognitively impaired and at risk for falls, was left unsupervised by staff when the resident was sitting on the facility front porch. The findings include: A review of the facility policy for supervision of residents titled Accidents and Supervision dated 12/09/2020 revealed it was facility policy to provide adequate supervision based on the individual need of each resident. […]

  • No harm, potential for minimal, widespreadF582Jan 7, 2022

    Based on record review, staff interview and review of the Form Instructions for the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) the facility failed to issue a NOMNC form to a resident, or his/her responsible party, two (2) days before the last day of coverage as indicated on the completed NOMNC forms; for one (1) of three (3) residents sampled for Beneficiary Protection Notification (Resident #65). The findings include: Review of the Form Instructions for the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) CMS- revealed A Medicare health provider must give an advance, completed copy of the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) to enrollees receiving skilled nursing, no later than two days before the termination of services. […]

Read 23 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 23 of 70 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jan 7, 2022Standard3 findings
  • Sep 22, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 12, 2020Infection control2 findings
  • Aug 4, 2020Complaint3 findings · 2 harm
  • Apr 4, 2019Standard6 findings
  • Feb 22, 2018Standard2 findings
  • Mar 22, 2017Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Dec 1, 2016Standard12 findings
Show the 13 earlier surveys
  • Jul 27, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 8, 2015Standard2 findings
  • Jun 29, 2015Complaint3 findings · 3 harm
  • Sep 4, 2014Standard2 findings
  • Jan 15, 2014Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Sep 19, 2013—2 findings
  • Aug 8, 2013—3 findings
  • Sep 20, 2012—4 findings
  • Aug 9, 2012—2 findings
  • May 17, 2012—9 findings
  • Jan 18, 2012—1 finding
  • Jul 27, 2011—8 findings · 3 harm
  • Mar 16, 2011—2 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction