Orchards of Cascadia, The
Nampa, Idaho · CCN 135019
21 surveys since 2010, 7 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 103
- Surveys
- 21
- Harm or worse
- 7
- Immediate jeopardy
- 2
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 100
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- CASCADIA HEALTHCARE
- County
- Canyon
- Medicare-certified since
- 1970
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 1
- Health inspection
- 1
- Staffing
- 3
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=14, floor 20).
Last survey on record
Jan 8, 2026
305 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.90 | 3.74 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.72 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 47.4% | 47.4% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $25,809 across 2 penalties
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J14.3% | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G14.3% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1773.9% | E28.7% | F28.7% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F7612×
Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
- F8802×
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
- F5611×
Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
- F5651×
Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
- F5781×
Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Orchards of Cascadia, The, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF698Nov 14, 2025
Based on policy review, record review, the facility's Incident and Accident (I&A) Report, and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident receiving dialysis services were provided appropriate monitoring, emergency response, and staff intervention consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan and the resident's goals and preferences. This was true for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #103) reviewed for hemodialysis. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Jun 6, 2024
Based on policy review, record review, facility Incident Report review, staff interview, and resident and resident representative interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision and intervention was provided during a resident's transfer to prevent falls. This was true for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #44) reviewed for falls. This resulted in harm to Resident #44 who sustained a hematoma on the right side of her face, eye, and jaw, and chest pain. Findings include: Resident #44 was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including abnormalities of gait and mobility, and contracture (rigidity of muscle or tendons resulting in a fixed deformity of a joint) of muscle to her right upper arm. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF684Sep 12, 2022
Based on policy review, record review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice. This was true for 2 of 7 residents (#3 and #5) whose records were reviewed for quality of care. Specifically: - Resident #3 experienced harm when she developed a [CONDITION(S)] to her left third toe. - Resident #5 was at risk for undetected neurological changes when his neurological assessments were not completed after unwitnessed falls. Findings include: 1. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF565Dec 1, 2025
Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to investigate resident grievances in a timely manner for four of four resident (Resident (R) 70, R15, R57, and R59) reviewed for resident council and eight of eight residents (R48, R8, R61, R77, R82, R4, R27, and R14) reviewed for repeated grievances of noise at night and concerns about customer service of 31 sample residents. This deficient practice had the potential to allow grievances to not be responded to in a timely manner for 93 residents.Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled, Grievance Process, with a revision date of 08/29/25, revealed: Policy: Residents and their families have the right to file a complaint without fear of reprisal. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF628Aug 5, 2026
Based on policy review, record review, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure transfers or discharges were documented in the resident's medical record and failed to provide required written notice of transfer or discharge to the resident or resident representative. This was true for 2 of 3 residents (Residents #2 and #3) whose records were reviewed for discharge processes. The lack of documentation and required notice created the potential for misinformation, poor continuity of care, and uncertainty regarding the resident's rights and discharge planning. […]
Read 21 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 21 of 103 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Aug 5, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Jan 8, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Dec 1, 2025Standard5 findings
- Nov 14, 2025Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Jun 6, 2024Standard and complaint3 findings · 1 harm
- Sep 12, 2022Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
- Sep 18, 2020Complaint5 findings · 2 harm
- Aug 18, 2020Infection control2 findings · 1 harm
Show the 13 earlier surveys
- May 27, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Jan 22, 2020Complaint1 finding
- Feb 15, 2019Standard13 findings
- Sep 7, 2017Standard7 findings
- Mar 1, 2017Complaint2 findings
- Jun 10, 2016Standard and complaint10 findings
- Jul 11, 2014Standard13 findings
- May 24, 2013—7 findings
- Dec 4, 2012—2 findings
- Aug 16, 2012—1 finding
- Feb 16, 2012—6 findings
- Nov 16, 2011—3 findings
- Dec 3, 2010—16 findings · 1 harm
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction