Orchard Park Health Care & Rehab Center
Tacoma, Washington · CCN 505093
53 surveys since 2012. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2017.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 277
- Surveys
- 53
- Harm or worse
- 12
- Immediate jeopardy
- 1
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 147
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- GENESIS HEALTHCARE
- County
- Pierce
- Medicare-certified since
- 1970
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 1
- Health inspection
- 1
- Staffing
- 4
- Quality measures
- 3
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 26 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in Washington.
Last survey on record
Jul 15, 2026
117 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.66 | 3.97 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.70 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 45.6% | 45.8% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $301,370 across 3 penalties
- Abuse icon
- Flagged by CMS on Care Compare
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G32.4% | H10.8% | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D6652.8% | E5241.6% | F32.4% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6846×
Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
- F6775×
Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
- F5844×
Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
- F6104×
Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
- F6584×
Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Orchard Park Health Care & Rehab Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Jan 31, 2023
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the safety of four of four sample residents who smoked (Residents 8, 9, 10 and 11) by failing to assess residents' ability to safely smoke without supervision; and by allowing, and assisting, residents to convene in a known resident smoking area on the facility property, unsupervised by staff, while oxygen was in use by one resident (Resident 8). In addition, the facility's designated smoking area did not have safety items readily available, as outlined in the facility policy. […]
- Actual harm, patternF689Jun 12, 2025
<Elopement> Review of a facility's policy titled, Elopements (when a resident identified as wandering leaves the facility without staff knowledge or authorization) - Resident Behavior and Facility Practices, dated 02/21/2025 showed when a resident who exhibited wandering behavior and/or were at risk for elopement received adequate supervision to prevent accidents, and received care in accordance with their person-centered plan of care addressing the unique factors contributing to wandering or elopement. Review showed monitoring and managing residents at risk for elopement and unsafe wandering showed the effectiveness of interventions would be evaluated and changes made as needed. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF684Aug 19, 2026
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 2 of 3 residents (Residents 1 & 4) reviewed, received the necessary care and services in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices. The facility failed to ensure Resident 1, and Resident 4 had wheelchairs which fit properly and were in good repair. These failures placed Resident 1 and Resident 4 at risk skin breakdown, accidents/hazards, uncomfortable positioning, and diminished quality of life. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Aug 19, 2026
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the required care planned supervision to prevent accidents for 2 of 4 sample residents (Resident 2 & 5) reviewed for accidents/hazards. The facility failed to assess safety risks, provide adequate resident supervision, and implement fall and elopement care plans (CP). Resident 2, who had a history of falling, experienced harm when they fell out of bed and fractured their nose, requiring hospitalization, due to fall prevention interventions not being implemented. These failures placed the residents at a potential risk of harm related to avoidable incidents. Findings included .Review of the facility's Fall Management policy, dated 05/26/2021 showed residents would be assessed for fall risk upon admission to the facility. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF550Aug 5, 2026
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services in a manner that maintained and promoted dignity for 10 of 10 sampled Residents (Resident 12, 8, 13, 1, 5, 4, 3, 7, 17 & 21) reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to ensure staff spoke in the English language in common areas and while providing personal care for 8 of 10 sampled residents (Residents 12, 8, 13, 7, 5, 4, 3, & 21) and failed to answer call lights timely for 5 of 10 sampled residents (Residents 1, 17, 8, 12 & 13). […]
Read 28 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 28 of 277 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Aug 19, 2026Complaint3 findings · 2 harm
- Aug 5, 2026Complaint9 findings · 2 harm
- Jul 15, 2026Complaint12 findings
- Jun 1, 2026Standard28 findings · 1 harm
- May 14, 2026Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- May 1, 2026Complaint2 findings
- Mar 26, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Mar 19, 2026Complaint1 finding
Show the 45 earlier surveys
- Jan 12, 2026Complaint2 findings
- Aug 25, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Aug 8, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Jul 30, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Jun 12, 2025Standard18 findings · 1 harm
- Apr 23, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Sep 19, 2024Complaint2 findings
- Sep 9, 2024Standard and complaint34 findings · 1 harm
- Jul 11, 2024Complaint3 findings
- Jun 7, 2024Complaint2 findings
- May 20, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Apr 2, 2024Complaint3 findings
- Jan 31, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Oct 27, 2023Standard and complaint29 findings
- Sep 19, 2023Complaint1 finding
- May 25, 2023Complaint1 finding
- May 18, 2023Complaint2 findings
- May 11, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Apr 28, 2023Complaint4 findings
- Jan 31, 2023Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Nov 10, 2022Standard14 findings
- Oct 4, 2022Complaint2 findings
- May 18, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Mar 8, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Nov 18, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Jun 30, 2021Complaint7 findings · 2 harm
- Jun 15, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Dec 17, 2020Complaint1 finding
- Jan 21, 2020Standard and complaint17 findings
- Dec 5, 2018Standard12 findings
- Apr 23, 2018Complaint2 findings
- Mar 1, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Dec 15, 2017Standard and complaint13 findings · 1 harm
- Mar 17, 2017Complaint2 findings
- Jan 10, 2017Standard7 findings
- Dec 1, 2016Complaint2 findings
- Jun 22, 2016Complaint2 findings
- Jun 8, 2016Complaint2 findings
- Jan 12, 2016Standard5 findings
- Nov 24, 2014Standard4 findings
- Oct 8, 2013—3 findings
- Apr 3, 2013—2 findings
- Nov 2, 2012—7 findings
- Jul 24, 2012—1 finding
- Apr 17, 2012—1 finding
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction