Orange Health Care Center
Orange, Connecticut · CCN 075434
17 surveys since 2011, 9 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 105
- Surveys
- 17
- Harm or worse
- 9
- Immediate jeopardy
- 1
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 60
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Naugatuck Vly
- Medicare-certified since
- 2003
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 5
- Health inspection
- 5
- Staffing
- 5
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 23 for-profit facilities with fewer than 66 beds in Connecticut.
Last survey on record
Jul 21, 2025
476 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.90 | 3.84 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.78 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 20.5% | 43.0% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1263.2% | E526.3% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B210.5% | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6572×
Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
- F6842×
Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
- F7612×
Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
- F5781×
Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
- F5801×
Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Orange Health Care Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF712Jul 21, 2025
Based on the review of clinical records, review of facility policy/procedures and interviews for three sampled residents (Residents #4, #8, and #34) reviewed for physician visits, the facility failed to ensure that the physician made alternating visits with the APRN’s every sixty days. The findings include: 1. Resident #4 was admitted to the facility 8/1/22 with diagnoses of type 2 diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease (CKD), peripheral vascular disease, and atrial fibrillation. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF761May 25, 2023
Based on a observation of one of two medication storage rooms, facility policy and staff interview, the facility failed to remove 4 of 4 expired intravenous (IV) solution bags from the storage stock. The findings include: A tour of the A Wing medication storage room on [DATE] at 11:54 AM with the DNS and Infection Preventionist identified the following: a. A 1-liter solutions bag of 0.9% Sodium Chloride was located in the black IV-Emergency (E) Box, had an expiration date of ,d+[DATE] (2 months past the expiration date). b. A 1-liter solution bag of 5% Dextrose was located in the black IV-E Box had an expiration date of ,d+[DATE] (5 months past the expiration date). c. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812May 25, 2023
Based on a tour of the Dietary Department with the Dietary Manager and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen and kitchen storage areas were maintained in a sanitary manner. The findings include: A tour of the Dietary Department with the Dietary Manager on 5/22/23 at 10:45 AM identified the following: a. The kitchen ceiling fan and the white pipe below it were noted to have a moderate accumulation of black and gray dust-like particles. b. The kitchen ceiling above the coffee machine was noted to have brown drip stains. c. The hatchway stairs (which led to the food storage room in the basement) were noted to have dry leaves and a heavy accumulation of black stains and debris on the step corners adjacent to the walls. d. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF578Apr 19, 2021
Based on clinical record review, review of facility documentation and interviews for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #39) reviewed for advanced directives, the facility failed to ensure that physician's orders for DNR were kept current on subsequent physician's orders. The findings include: Resident #39's diagnoses included type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypernatremia, hypokalemia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dementia, seizure disorder, metabolic encephalopathy, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia. The quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #39 had severe cognitive impairment and required extensive to total assistance with all activities of daily living with the omission of eating. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF730Apr 19, 2021
Based on review of facility documentation, facility policy and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that required yearly in service training was completed related to caring for cognitively impaired residents. The findings include: An interview and review of the required yearly nurse aide training with RN #1 dated 4/15/21 at 10:20 AM identified that there was no training related to dementia and the care of the cognitively impaired resident conducted for the past year (2020). RN #1 identified that the dementia training should have been started at the time the facility was impacted by the pandemic. […]
Read 29 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 29 of 105 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jul 21, 2025Standard5 findings
- May 25, 2023Standard9 findings
- Apr 19, 2021Standard7 findings
- Apr 28, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Mar 13, 2019Standard5 findings
- Jan 17, 2018Standard5 findings
- Jul 14, 2017Complaint1 finding
- Feb 24, 2017Standard4 findings
Show the 9 earlier surveys
- May 19, 2016Standard8 findings
- Jul 23, 2015Standard11 findings · 1 harm
- Apr 8, 2015Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Oct 2, 2014Standard13 findings · 1 harm
- Jul 24, 2014Complaint10 findings · 2 harm
- Nov 1, 2013—11 findings · 1 harm
- Mar 13, 2013—5 findings · 2 harm
- Sep 7, 2012—4 findings
- Jun 28, 2011—5 findings · 1 harm
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction