Orange City Nursing and Rehab Center
Debary, Florida · CCN 105735
17 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2024.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 55
- Surveys
- 17
- Harm or worse
- 2
- Immediate jeopardy
- 2
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 120
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- SOVEREIGN HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS
- County
- Volusia
- Medicare-certified since
- 1991
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 4
- Health inspection
- 3
- Staffing
- 4
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=6, floor 20).
Last survey on record
Mar 27, 2025
592 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.57 | 3.57 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.88 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 39.6% | 44.5% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $16,801 across 2 penalties
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J233.3% | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D233.3% | E— | F233.3% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Orange City Nursing and Rehab Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF578Mar 19, 2024
Based on a review of resident records, the facility's policy and procedure for Advance Directives, facility reports, and interviews with staff, the facility failed to act in accordance with the resident's Advance Directives in accordance with her Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) status (the desire have cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) withheld in the event that her heart or breathing stopped) after finding her unresponsive with no respirations. This affected one (Resident #1) of nine residents reviewed for Advance Directives. The facility's failure to review and honor Resident #1's DNR status deprived her of a natural death and likely caused unnecessary pain and bodily damage. […]
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF678Mar 19, 2024
Based on a review of resident records, the facility's policy and procedure for CPR; Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation, facility reports, and interviews with staff, the facility failed to act in accordance with the resident's Advance Directives and her Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) status (the desire have CPR withheld in the event her heart or breathing stopped) by providing CPR upon finding her unresponsive with no respirations. This affected one (Resident #1) of nine residents reviewed for Advance Directives. The facility's failure to review and honor Resident #1's DNR deprived her of a natural death and likely caused unnecessary pain and bodily damage. Resident #1 expired in the hospital after prolonged life-sustaining efforts had been made and after family discontinued her from life support. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF802May 11, 2023
Based on observations, record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed provide sufficient kitchen staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of food and nutrition service. Failure to ensure that dietary staff were trained and knowledgeable about the proper procedures for food safety and sanitation had the potential to negatively impact all residents who received meals from the kitchen. The findings include: A kitchen tour was conducted on 05/10/23 at 10:40 a.m. During the tour, Cook D was asked to explain the appropriate method of calibrating a food thermometer. She stated, A glass of water in ice starting at 40 F and up to 165 F. It should be below 40 F for cold food. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812May 11, 2023
Based on kitchen food service observations, staff interviews, facility document review, and facility policy and procedure review, the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety, by failing to follow proper food handling practices to prevent the outbreak of foodborne illness with the potential to affect all residents who consumed foods from the facility's kitchen. Unsafe food handling practices represent a potential source of pathogen exposure. The findings include: An initial tour of the kitchen was conducted on 05/07/23 at 11:11 a.m. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF656Mar 27, 2025
Based on record review, interviews, and facility policy and procedure review, the facility failed to develop and implement a care plan for anticoagulant use for one (Resident #68) of five residents reviewed for medication use, from a total survey sample of 34 residents. The findings include: A record review revealed that Resident #68 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic ischemic heart disease, diabetes mellitus - type 2 due to underlying condition with diabetic kidney disease, and unspecified displaced fracture of the surgical neck of the right humerus. A review of Resident #68's physician's orders revealed an order for Apixaban (anticoagulant) 5 mg (milligrams) by mouth twice daily (order dated 7/12/24). […]
Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 55 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Mar 27, 2025Standard1 finding
- Mar 19, 2024Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
- May 11, 2023Standard2 findings
- Sep 2, 2021Standard1 finding
- Jan 23, 2020Complaint2 findings
- Sep 26, 2019Standard3 findings
- Aug 9, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Jun 1, 2018Standard9 findings
Show the 9 earlier surveys
- Apr 7, 2017Standard3 findings
- May 12, 2016Standard5 findings
- Feb 12, 2015Standard10 findings
- Aug 4, 2014Complaint2 findings
- Apr 3, 2014Standard1 finding
- Mar 7, 2013—4 findings
- Feb 17, 2012—1 finding
- Dec 8, 2011—7 findings
- Aug 5, 2011—1 finding
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction