Opus Post Acute Rehabilitation

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Opus Post Acute Rehabilitation, in the surveyor’s own words.

• Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF880Dec 16, 2024

  Based on observations, interviews, record review and review of facility policy, (1) the facility failed to ensure that proper infection control measures were taken regarding aerosol drainage bags for Resident (R)62 and R68, for 2 of 5 residents reviewed. Furthermore, (2) the facility failed to properly clean and disinfect blood glucose metered device, that was shared with multiple residents, R388, R45, and R340, for 3 of 5 residents revealed. On 11/25/24 at 8:19 AM, the State Agency (SA) determined that the facility's non-compliance with one or more federal health, safety, and/or quality regulations has caused or was likely to cause serious injury, serious harm, serious impairment, or death. […]

• No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Dec 16, 2024

  Based on observation, interviews and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure foods was labeled, stored, and discarded according to the expiration date, in 1 of 1 main kitchen. This failure had the potential to cause foodborne illnesses. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Labeling and Dating of Foods dated 2020, documented All food items in the storeroom, refrigerator, and freezer need to be labeled and dated. Newly opened food items will need to be closed and labeled with an open date and used by the date that follows guidelines . […]

• No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF550Apr 16, 2025

  Based on observation, interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to promote a homelike dining experience. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure staff did not stand to assist residents with the meals for one (1) of one (1) dependent resident (Resident (R)8). Additionally, the facility failed to remove the plated food, eating utensils, and drinks from the serving tray onto the table for three (3) of three (3) residents that dined communally (R1, R2, and R9). Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Resident Rights revised on 10/2015 revealed, . […]

• No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF558Apr 16, 2025

  Based on review of facility policy, observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure call lights were within reach for 6 of 13 residents reviewed. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure that a resident wheelchair arms were not in need of repair, for 1 of 1 resident. Findings include: Review of the facility's Call Light/Bell policy, revised on 05/2007, revealed, . It is the policy of this facility to provide the resident a means of communication with nursing staff . […]

• No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF689Apr 16, 2025

  Based on observation, record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure (1) the fall mat was in a position to prevent an accident for 1 of 5 residents reviewed, Resident (R)2. The facility also failed to ensure resident bathroom/shower room floors were not excessively slippery, for 4 of 5 residents reviewed, R3, R7, R10, R11. Additionally, (2) the facility failed to provide appropriate supervision for R1, resulting in R1 falling and suffering injuries, for 1 of 5 residents reviewed. Findings include: Review of the facility's Environment Conditions/Environmental Rounds, policy revised on 11/2019, revealed, . […]