Optima Care Castle Hill
Union City, New Jersey · CCN 315344
23 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2022.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 88
- Surveys
- 23
- Harm or worse
- 2
- Immediate jeopardy
- 2
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 215
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- OPTIMA CARE
- County
- Hudson
- Medicare-certified since
- 1995
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 2
- Health inspection
- 1
- Staffing
- 4
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 168 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in New Jersey.
Last survey on record
Jan 15, 2026
298 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.60 | 3.47 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.88 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 42.2% | 41.8% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $8,281 across 1 penalty
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J13.1% | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1546.9% | E1443.8% | F13.1% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C13.1% |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6102×
Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
- F6552×
Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
- F6562×
Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
- F6892×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
- F6952×
Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Optima Care Castle Hill, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Jan 15, 2026
Based on interviews and review of pertinent facility documents on 01/12/26, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a safe environment during supervision by staff of a severely cognitively impaired resident (Resident #1) who was a high risk for elopement, had poor safety awareness, and exit-seeking behaviors.On 12/30/25, Resident #1 was able to open the 6th floor [NAME] side alarmed exit door, went down ten flights of stairs and exited through the side door of the facility on to the street. At approximately 4:00 PM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 alerted the nurse management that the resident was nowhere to be found. […]
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF604Aug 18, 2022
Complaint#: NJ 4 Based on interviews, medical records review, and review of other pertinent facility documentation on 8/9/2022, 8/15/2022, and 8/18/2022, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident (Resident #2) with a known diagnosis [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . On 8/1/2022, Resident #2 exhibited behaviors and was non-compliant with keeping his/her safety helmet on and sitting in the wheelchair on the 3:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m. shift. Since Resident #2 was non-compliant, the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA #1), who was assigned to Resident #2 until 9:00 p.m., requested CNA #2 to assist her in moving the long table in the dining/recreation room towards the wall. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Mar 10, 2025
Based on observation, interview and document review it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the proper rinse temperature was consistently maintained for the dish machine and dishware was appropriately dried to limit potential bacterial growth and the potential for food borne illness. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 03/04/25 at 9:28 AM, the surveyor observed the dish machine in use cleaning the breakfast dishes. The surveyor observed, with staff, the final rinse temperature was 172 degrees Fahrenheit (F). Dietary Staff (DS #1) was also observed removing the plates from the dish machine with his bare hands and he proceeded to wipe the plates with a rag, and then placed them on a rack. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF925Mar 5, 2021
COMPLAINT #: NJ 7, NJ 6, NJ 6 Based on observation, interview, and review of facility provided documentation on 3/5/2021, it was determined that the facility failed to provide an effective pest control program. The evidence includes the following: During the survey entrance at 9:35 a.m., a request was made to the facility Administrator (Admin.) and Maintenance Director (MD) to provide the facility Contracted Pest Control (CPC) vendors pest sighting log book for January, February, and March 2021 for review. At this time, the MD told the surveyor there is a CPC pest sighting log book on each of the 3 resident floors. Starting at 10:11 a.m., in the presence of the facility MD an inspection of the 4th, 5th, and 6th floors was performed. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF550Mar 10, 2025
Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure all residents were treated in a dignified manner by failing to ensure a) residents who were dependent on staff for care were provided with incontinence care prior to being served meals, and b) residents eating meals in the same dining room were served meals at the same time. This deficient practice occurred for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for dignity (Resident #31 and #42 and #129) and was evidenced by the following: On 2/27/25 at 10:16 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #129 in bed and the resident was partly covered and the incontinence brief could be observed bulging from the back. The resident informed the surveyor they were last provided with incontinence care at 5:00 AM. […]
Read 21 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 21 of 88 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jan 15, 2026Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Dec 4, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Mar 10, 2025Standard15 findings
- Feb 10, 2025Infection control1 finding
- Aug 30, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Jan 13, 2023Standard13 findings
- Aug 18, 2022Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
- Mar 5, 2021Complaint1 finding
Show the 15 earlier surveys
- Dec 10, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Oct 29, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Aug 28, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Apr 15, 2019Standard8 findings
- Apr 27, 2018Standard4 findings
- Mar 31, 2017Standard4 findings
- Jan 12, 2017Complaint5 findings
- Nov 15, 2016Complaint2 findings
- Mar 1, 2016Standard6 findings
- Apr 1, 2015Standard3 findings
- Apr 11, 2014Standard2 findings
- Feb 13, 2013—6 findings
- Mar 1, 2012—4 findings
- Jun 14, 2011—1 finding
- Jan 26, 2011—4 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction