Optalis Health and Rehabilitation of Allen Park
Allen Park, Michigan · CCN 235439
43 surveys since 2010, 6 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 184
- Surveys
- 43
- Harm or worse
- 6
- Immediate jeopardy
- 1
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 163
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- OPTALIS HEALTH & REHABILITATION
- County
- Wayne
- Medicare-certified since
- 1985
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 3
- Health inspection
- 3
- Staffing
- 2
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 82 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in Michigan.
Last survey on record
Apr 16, 2026
207 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.86 | 3.69 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.36 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 45.4% | 43.0% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D3780.4% | E36.5% | F48.7% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B24.3% | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6563×
Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
- F6773×
Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
- F6843×
Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
- F8803×
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
- F6002×
Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Optalis Health and Rehabilitation of Allen Park, in the surveyor’s own words.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880Jun 4, 2025
This Citation Has Two Deficient Practice Statements. Deficient Practice Statement #1 Based on interview and record review the facility failed to maintain an infection control program that included a system for preventing, identifying, reporting, investigating and controlling infections. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 124 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: On 6/3/25 at 2:20 PM, an interview was conducted with the facility's Infection Control Preventionist (ICP), Nurse 'A'. Nurse 'A' said they assumed the role as the ICP effective May 18, 2025. They further reported the previous ICP Nurse did not compile April 2025's data and May 2025's data was not finished. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880Jul 2, 2024
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a proper sanitizing product was used to kill Clostridium difficile (C. diff - a bacteria that can cause diarrhea) resulting in the potential spread in infection and disease, potentially affecting all residents who resided in the facility. Findings include: On 6/25/24 at 9:50 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) I indicated the resident in room [ROOM NUMBER] was on transmission-based precautions because of a C. diff. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Jul 12, 2023
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain sanitary conditions in the kitchen resulting in an increased potential for cross contamination of food and foodborne illness, potentially affecting all residents who receive oral food meal services (109 residents, with 2 NPO) out of the facility's total census of 111 residents. Findings include: 1. On 7/10/23 at 12:14 PM, Dietary Manager, staff A, was observed with gloved hands taking a sanitizing towel out of a wiping cloth bucket, wiping off the steam table's serving board, placing the towel back into the wiping cloth bucket and with the same gloves began assembling grilled cheese sandwiches. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF882Jul 12, 2023
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Infection Preventionist completed specialized training in infection prevention and control, resulting in the potential for knowledge deficits pertaining to current infection prevention and control standards and infectious disease outbreaks. Findings include: In an interview on 7/10/23 at approximately 11:00 am, the Director of Nursing (DON) reported Infection Preventionist H was responsible for infection control and due to her absence the unit managers have been assisting. Review of an training certificate provided by the facility revealed IP H only received specialized training in COVID-19 training for frontline nursing home staff. In an interview on 7/10/23 at 2:00 p.m. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812May 12, 2022
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food under sanitary conditions, resulting in the potential for food borne illnesses. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 80 of 95 residents that received meals from the kitchen. Findings include: 1.On 5/11/22 at 11:45 A.M. potentially hazardous food products were served from the kitchen above the recommended food safety zone of 41 degrees or (lower). Temperatures taken at the beginning of the tray line during the lunch meal were as follows: Coleslaw- 53 degrees Fahrenheit Potato Salad- 51 degrees Fahrenheit. The use of cooling devices were attempted after dietary staff began verifying the temperatures and serving the food. 2). […]
Read 26 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 26 of 184 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Apr 16, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Jul 23, 2025Complaint3 findings
- Jun 4, 2025Standard and complaint10 findings
- Feb 11, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Jul 16, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Jul 2, 2024Standard10 findings
- May 8, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Apr 11, 2024Complaint1 finding
Show the 35 earlier surveys
- Mar 20, 2024Complaint2 findings
- Nov 30, 2023Complaint2 findings
- Oct 25, 2023Complaint2 findings
- Aug 9, 2023Complaint2 findings
- Jul 12, 2023Standard and complaint10 findings
- Jan 23, 2023Complaint1 finding
- May 12, 2022Standard13 findings
- Oct 27, 2021Complaint2 findings
- Aug 17, 2021Complaint2 findings
- Feb 10, 2021Complaint3 findings
- Aug 11, 2020Complaint1 finding
- Feb 6, 2020Standard8 findings
- Sep 24, 2019Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Mar 21, 2019Standard and complaint6 findings
- Dec 18, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Apr 18, 2018Standard10 findings
- Aug 10, 2017Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Mar 16, 2017Standard10 findings
- Feb 11, 2016Standard and complaint9 findings
- Sep 25, 2015Complaint1 finding
- Mar 13, 2015Standard and complaint18 findings
- Feb 12, 2015Complaint1 finding
- Jul 23, 2014Complaint2 findings
- Jun 19, 2014Complaint2 findings
- May 2, 2014Standard and complaint8 findings
- Jun 13, 2013—2 findings
- May 10, 2013—10 findings · 1 harm
- Feb 7, 2013—2 findings
- May 18, 2012—2 findings
- May 4, 2012Standard8 findings · 1 harm
- Mar 5, 2012—1 finding · 1 harm
- Jul 15, 2011—8 findings
- Jun 14, 2011—2 findings
- Oct 28, 2010—1 finding
- Oct 15, 2010—2 findings · 1 harm
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction