Omaha Nursing and Rehabilitation Center
Omaha, Nebraska · CCN 285240
33 surveys since 2010. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2015.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 147
- Surveys
- 33
- Harm or worse
- 16
- Immediate jeopardy
- 7
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 70
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- THE ENSIGN GROUP
- County
- Douglas
- Medicare-certified since
- 2001
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 1
- Health inspection
- 1
- Staffing
- 2
- Quality measures
- 3
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 26 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in Nebraska.
Last survey on record
Apr 1, 2026
222 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.77 | 3.50 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.42 | — |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $39,146 across 1 penalty
- Payment denials
- 1
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J12.0% | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G612.2% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D3469.4% | E510.2% | F24.1% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C12.0% |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F8805×
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
- F6894×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
- F6973×
Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
- F7603×
Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
- F5842×
Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Omaha Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689May 3, 2023
LICENSURE REFERENCE NUMBER 175 NAC 12-006.09D7 Based on record review and interview; the facility staff failed to implement interventions to prevent elopement for 2 (Resident 31 and 50) of 2 sampled residents. The facility staff identified a census of 62. The findings are: A Record review of the Policy and Procedure for Elopement with a revision date of 2/2022 revealed residents identified to be at risk for elopement will have an individualized care plan and interventions implemented. Residents whose assessment identified wandering behavior shall also be considered at risk for elopement. […]
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF835May 3, 2023
LICENSURE REFERENCE NUMBER 175 NAC 12-006.02 Based on observations, record review, and interviews; the facility administration staff failed to ensure effective management of facility resources to maintain the highest practical wellbeing of residents and the facility environment as evidenced by failure to implement an effective plan of action to maintain correction for previously cited areas of deficient practice and failure to ensure the facility identified and developed plans of action to identify multiple issues of deficient practice. The facility staff identified a census was 62. Findings are: Review of the facility during the current survey revealed the following deficiencies: -F550. The facility failed to ensure resident dignity was maintained for 2 of 3 residents. -F583. […]
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF865May 3, 2023
LICENSURE REFERENCE NUMBER 175 NAC 12-006.07C Based on record review and staff interviews; the facility Quality Assessment Performance Improvement Plan (QAPIP) failed to identify ongoing issues relevant to F550, F580, F609, F657, F676, F689, F712, F730, F755, F758, F761, F812, F835 and F867 and implement plans of action to identify and correct the deficient practice. The QAPI failed to ensure repeated deficiencies at F692 and F697 were corrected and the correction maintained. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents who reside in the facility. The facility staff identified a census of 92. Findings are: Record review of a undated facility Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program revealed the following information: -Goal: -1. […]
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF660Jun 10, 2021
Licensure reference: 175 NAC ,d+[DATE].09C2 Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to arrange necessary services related to wound care and medications to ensure a safe discharge plan for 1 [Resident 1] of 4 sampled residents. The facility had a total census of 49 residents. Findings are: A review of Resident 1's Progress Notes dated [DATE] revealed a representative from the homeless shelter had reported that the rescue squad had to be called to pick up Resident 1 when Resident 1 was dropped off by the nursing home to the homeless shelter. According tothe [DATE] Progress Note, the homeless shelter representative reported Resident 1 did know where Resident 1 was or how Resident 1 got to the homeless shelter. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Jul 31, 2025
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(I) Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(I)(i)(1)Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to transfer a resident according to the plan of care resulting in a significant injury for 1 (Resident 32) of 1 resident sampled for transfers; and the facility failed to implement call interventions identified on the plan of care for 1 (Resident 68) of 3 residents sampled for falls. The facility staff identified a census of 64.The findings are:A. Record review of Resident 68’s Minimum Data Set (MDS: a federally mandated assessment tool used for care planning) dated 06-23-2025 revealed the facility staff assessed the following about the resident: -Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) was scored at a 9. […]
Read 34 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 34 of 147 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Apr 1, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Oct 7, 2025Complaint2 findings
- Jul 31, 2025Standard and complaint15 findings · 2 harm
- Jul 10, 2025Complaint3 findings
- Mar 3, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Oct 31, 2024Complaint4 findings · 1 harm
- Oct 1, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Jun 13, 2024Standard4 findings
Show the 25 earlier surveys
- Oct 26, 2023Complaint2 findings
- May 3, 2023Standard16 findings · 6 harm
- Mar 8, 2023Complaint3 findings
- Dec 29, 2022Infection control2 findings
- Dec 27, 2021Standard and complaint8 findings
- Jun 10, 2021Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Feb 10, 2021Complaint4 findings · 1 harm
- Jul 14, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Feb 25, 2020Standard9 findings · 2 harm
- Nov 26, 2019Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Feb 7, 2019Complaint2 findings
- Jan 2, 2019Complaint3 findings
- Oct 29, 2018Standard5 findings
- Apr 23, 2018Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
- Oct 26, 2017Complaint1 finding
- Aug 22, 2017Standard13 findings
- Apr 13, 2017Complaint1 finding
- Jun 14, 2016Standard and complaint9 findings
- Dec 7, 2015Complaint4 findings · 1 harm
- Sep 3, 2015Complaint5 findings
- Jul 23, 2015Standard and complaint7 findings
- Jul 9, 2014Standard4 findings
- Mar 12, 2013—4 findings
- Sep 19, 2011—7 findings
- Jul 28, 2010—2 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction