Old Mill Rehabilitation
Omaha, Nebraska · CCN 285289
19 surveys since 2015, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 54
- Surveys
- 19
- Harm or worse
- 0
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 44
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- PROMONTORY HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT
- County
- Douglas
- Medicare-certified since
- 2014
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 3
- Health inspection
- 3
- Staffing
- 3
- Quality measures
- 3
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded fewer weighted findings than most of its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 25 for-profit facilities with fewer than 66 beds in Nebraska.
Last survey on record
Apr 2, 2026
221 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.85 | 3.71 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.61 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 67.3% | 64.2% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1266.7% | E316.7% | F211.1% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C15.6% |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F5802×
Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
- F6562×
Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
- F5841×
Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
- F6051×
Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
- F6061×
Not hire anyone with a finding of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or theft.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Old Mill Rehabilitation, in the surveyor’s own words.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF801Apr 2, 2026
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Dietary Manager was qualified per regulations. This had the potential to affect all 36 residents that resided in the facility. The facility census was 36. Findings are:Record review of the facility Dietary Managers employee file revealed a hire date of 3/27/26. A review of the Dietary Managers employee file revealed no formal education in food or nutrition and no certification as a Dietary Manager. Interview on 03/30/2026 at 10:55 AM with the facility Administrator confirmed that the DM is not currently certified and is enrolled in the class that will start 05/01/2026. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Apr 2, 2026
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the cleanliness of ceiling ventilation system covers in the facility kitchen and ventilation fans in the walk in cooler in the facility kitchen to prevent the potential for food borne illness. This had the potential to affect all residents that resided in the facility and ate foods prepared in the facility kitchen. The facility census was 36. Findings are:Observation on 03/31/2026 between 9:40 AM and 10:35 AM with the facility Dietary Manager [DM] revealed the following sanitation concerns in the facility kitchen: There were specks of a grey fuzzy substance that resembled dust present on the exterior of the ventilation cover for 4 ventilation covers in the ceiling in the kitchen. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF584Apr 10, 2025
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.19 Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain the cleanliness of the interior and exterior of ventilation covers in 8 (Rooms 130, 131, 134, 144, 146, 147, 148, 150 ) of 21 occupied resident rooms on the south hallway of the facility. The facility census was 39. Findings are: Observation on 04/10/25 between 8:45 AM and 9:26 AM with the facility Administrator (ADM) and Maintenance Director (MD) revealed interior and exterior ventilation covers in resident bathrooms in rooms 130, 131, 134, 144, 146, 147, 148, and 150, on the south hallway of the facility, were coated with a white and gray fuzzy substance that resembled dust. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF923Apr 10, 2025
Licensure Reference Number 175 12-007.04D Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure that ventilation systems were operational in resident bathrooms in 11 (Rooms 127, 130, 139, 143, 144, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 152) of 21 occupied resident bathrooms on the south hallway of the facility. The facility census was 39. Findings are: Observation on 04/10/25 between 8:45 AM and 9:26 AM with the facility Administrator (ADM) and the facility Maintenance Director (MD) revealed that the ventilation system was not functional and would not draw a 1 ply square of toilet paper to the surface of the ventilation cover in resident bathrooms in resident rooms 127, 130, 139, 143, 144, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 152 on the south hallway of the facility. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF725Nov 26, 2024
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12.006.04(G) Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident's call lights were answered within 20 minutes as expected for 4 (Residents 1, 2, 3, and 4) of 4 sampled residents. The facility census was 26. Findings are: A record review of the facility's Call Lights: Accessibility and Timely Response policy dated 2018 revealed call lights would directly relay to a staff member to ensure appropriate response. All staff members who see or hear an activated call light are responsible for responding but did not reveal a timeframe the call light was to be answered in. A record review of the facility's Patient Concern Forms dated 05/15/2024 through 10/28/2024 revealed 4 residents had complained about long call light times. A. […]
Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 54 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Apr 2, 2026Standard4 findings
- Apr 10, 2025Standard6 findings
- Nov 26, 2024Complaint2 findings
- Jul 24, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Apr 16, 2024Standard and complaint3 findings
- Mar 5, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Jul 3, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Mar 21, 2023Standard and complaint2 findings
Show the 11 earlier surveys
- Oct 6, 2022Complaint3 findings
- Dec 14, 2021Standard3 findings
- Aug 26, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Nov 9, 2020Infection control2 findings
- Dec 19, 2019Standard5 findings
- Sep 24, 2018Standard2 findings
- Aug 8, 2018Complaint3 findings
- May 7, 2018Complaint7 findings
- Jul 20, 2017Standard and complaint4 findings
- May 9, 2016Standard3 findings
- May 19, 2015Standard and complaint1 finding
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction