Deficiency Index

Oklahoma Memory Care Institute

Tulsa, Oklahoma · CCN 375468

26 surveys since 2010, 8 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
149
Surveys
26
Harm or worse
8
Immediate jeopardyall corrected before survey
1
The record, 2010–2026
’10’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy1

Findings at the most serious level CMS records. All were recorded as past non-compliance — corrected before the survey.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file19/26

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
56
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
Independent
County
Tulsa
Medicare-certified since
2004

CMS ratings

Overall
2
Health inspection
2
Staffing
2
Quality measures
2

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 50 for-profit facilities with fewer than 66 beds in Oklahoma.

Last survey on record

Mar 18, 2026

236 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.983.80
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.28—

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$8,653 across 1 penalty

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ13.2%K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD1341.9%E1754.8%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 31 of the 149 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6893×

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

  • F5502×

    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.

  • F7002×

    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.

  • F8802×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

  • F5681×

    Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Oklahoma Memory Care Institute, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Feb 11, 2025

    A past noncompliance Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was determined to exist effective 01/30/25 related to the facility's failure to supervise and prevent a resident from elopement. The facility failed to prevent Resident #1 from eloping from the facility which had the potential to result in serious injury or harm. On 02/11/24, the Oklahoma State Department of Health verified the existence of the past noncompliance IJ related to the facility's failure to protect and prevent accident hazards related to elopement. The past noncompliance IJ was removed effective 01/31/25 after the facility put measures in place to prevent recurrence. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF578Aug 27, 2026

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to offer residents a choice to formulate an advance directive for 3 (#18, 36 and #37) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for advance directive acknowledgements. The administrator identified 35 residents resided at the facility. Findings: A policy titled Advance Directives, dated 11/2022, read in part, 1. The resident has the right to formulate an advance directive, including the right to accept or refuse medical or surgical treatment. 2. Prior to or upon admission of a resident, the social services director or designee inquires of the resident, his/her family members and/or his or her legal representative, about the existence of any written advance directives. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF600Mar 18, 2026

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain an abuse free environment for 3 (#2, 3, and #4) of 5 sampled residents reviewed for abuse. The administrator identified 38 residents resided in the facility. Findings:A facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation, implemented 01/2026, read in part, The facility will develop and implement written policies and procedures that: Prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, and exploitation of residents and misappropriation of resident property.Establishing a safe environment that supports, to the extent possible, a resident's consensual sexual relationship and by establishing policies and protocols for preventing sexual abuse.1. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF550Oct 31, 2024

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with dignity by being called their preferred name for three (#18, 20, and #24) and failed to ensure dignity with dining for nine (#5, 10, 12, 15, 18, 26, 33, 34, and #44) of eight sampled residents who were reviewed for dignity. The DON identified eight residents who were dependent on staff for meals who ate in the dining room. Findings: An undated Promoting/Maintaining Resident Dignity During Mealtimes policy, read in part, .All staff will be seated, if possible, while feeding a resident . 1. On 10/28/24 at 8:21 a.m., the DON was observed to assist dependent residents with the morning meal in the dining room. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF689Oct 31, 2024

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were transferred safely with a mechanical lift for two (#21 and #18) of two sampled residents reviewed for mechanical transfers. The DON identified four residents who utilized a mechanical lift. Findings: 1. Resident #21 had diagnoses which included dementia, anxiety, and heart failure. A care plan for Resident #21, initiated 02/28/24, documented to transfer with two staff using the mechanical lift. On 10/28/24 8:04 a.m., CNA #2 entered the room of Resident #21 alone with the mechanical lift. On 10/28/24 at 8:29 a.m., CNA #2 opened the door to the room of Resident #21. The mechanical lift was observed in the room and the resident was observed to be in their wheel chair with the sling under them. […]

Read 26 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 26 of 149 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Aug 27, 2026Standard6 findings
  • Mar 18, 2026Complaint2 findings
  • Feb 11, 2025Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Jan 29, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 31, 2024Standard9 findings
  • Oct 16, 2024Complaint2 findings
  • Sep 22, 2023Standard13 findings
  • Oct 20, 2022Standard and complaint3 findings
Show the 18 earlier surveys
  • Mar 10, 2020Complaint7 findings
  • Jan 14, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 26, 2019Standard12 findings · 1 harm
  • Jul 16, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 17, 2018Standard and complaint18 findings · 2 harm
  • Aug 22, 2017Standard5 findings
  • Dec 19, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 23, 2016Standard11 findings
  • Aug 13, 2015Standard3 findings
  • Jul 7, 2015Complaint3 findings
  • Jun 6, 2014Standard and complaint16 findings · 1 harm
  • Apr 19, 2013—9 findings · 1 harm
  • Apr 3, 2013—1 finding
  • Mar 15, 2013—2 findings
  • Feb 7, 2013—1 finding
  • Mar 8, 2012—11 findings · 2 harm
  • Apr 28, 2011—8 findings
  • Oct 21, 2010—2 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction