Oasis Nursing & Rehabilitation Center
El Paso, Texas · CCN 675568
36 surveys since 2010, 12 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 124
- Surveys
- 36
- Harm or worse
- 12
- Immediate jeopardy
- 8
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 130
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- CREATIVE SOLUTIONS IN HEALTHCARE
- County
- El Paso
- Medicare-certified since
- 1996
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 4
- Health inspection
- 4
- Staffing
- 1
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 209 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in Texas.
Last survey on record
Jun 25, 2026
137 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.40 | 3.26 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.47 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 94.8% | 55.3% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1648.5% | E1442.4% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B13.0% | C26.1% |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F7613×
Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
- F8123×
Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
- F8803×
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
- F5582×
Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
- F6562×
Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Oasis Nursing & Rehabilitation Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF610Apr 22, 2022
Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations of abuse were thoroughly investigated and to prevent further abuse while the investigation is in progress for 1 (Residents #2) of 7 residents reviewed for abuse/neglect, in that: 1) The facility failed to investigate an allegation of physical abuse to Resident #2. 2) The facility failed to prevent further potential abuse and mistreatment by allowing the alleged perpetrator to remain in the facility and to have direct contact with the residents. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was identified on 4/20/2022 at 4:20 p.m. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF732Nov 19, 2021
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to post required nurse staffing information on a daily basis and failed to maintain the posted daily nurse staffing data for a minimum of two years as required by state law. Available facility Nurse Staffing Information postings did not include required information for 78 of 79 dates in October and November reviewed. The facility did not retain Nurse Staffing Information for July, August or September 2021 as required by state law. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF835Nov 19, 2021
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility administration failed to administer the facility in a manner that enabled it to use its resources effectively and efficiently to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of 7 (Residents 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 9 and 10) of 19 residents reviewed for having their daily care needs met. The facility failed to adequately address clinical staff shortages (nurses and CNAs) and failed to implement its emergency preparedness plan to address a shortage of nursing personnel. This failure put residents who needed assistance with ADLs at increased risk of not having their daily care needs met. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF693Aug 18, 2026
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents receiving enteral nutrition received appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications associated with eternal feedings and failed to maintain an effective infection prevention control program designed to prevent the development and transmission of infections for 4 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, and Resident #4) of 4 residents reviewed. -The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's external feeding bag was not dated in accordance with professional standards of practice.-The facility failed to ensure PEG/G-tube dressings were maintained clean, dry, dated, and changed as required when drainage or soiling was present for Residents #2, #3 and #4.These deficient practices could place… […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF695Jun 25, 2026
Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needed respiratory care was provided with such care, consistent with professional standards of practice for 2 (Resident #32 and Resident #12) of 11 residents observed for oxygen management.The facility failed to maintain the oxygen concentrator filter for Resident #12.The facility failed on 06/23/2026 to ensure an oxygen warning sign was posted outside the room of Resident #32 while the resident was receiving oxygen therapy.These failures had the potential to expose residents receiving oxygen therapy delayed identification of oxygen-related needs, increase the risk of fire hazards associated with oxygen use, reduce airflow, decrease equipment efficiency, and potentially affect oxygen… […]
Read 32 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 32 of 124 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Aug 18, 2026Complaint4 findings
- Jun 25, 2026Standard7 findings
- Apr 18, 2025Standard4 findings
- Apr 2, 2024Complaint2 findings
- Feb 8, 2024Standard and complaint5 findings
- Oct 27, 2023Complaint3 findings
- Mar 8, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Jan 5, 2023Standard12 findings
Show the 28 earlier surveys
- Jun 22, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Apr 22, 2022Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
- Dec 21, 2021Infection control1 finding
- Nov 19, 2021Complaint3 findings
- Oct 21, 2021Standard and complaint4 findings
- Sep 10, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Oct 3, 2019Standard7 findings
- Aug 23, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Apr 23, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Oct 4, 2018Standard3 findings
- Nov 16, 2017Standard7 findings · 1 harm
- Jul 31, 2017Complaint4 findings · 4 harm
- Aug 19, 2016Standard6 findings
- Feb 4, 2016Complaint1 finding
- Oct 15, 2015Standard and complaint9 findings · 4 harm
- Apr 14, 2015Complaint1 finding
- Jan 20, 2015Complaint2 findings
- Dec 11, 2014Complaint2 findings
- Sep 11, 2014Standard2 findings
- Jul 15, 2014Complaint1 finding
- May 1, 2014Complaint2 findings
- Oct 18, 2013—1 finding
- Aug 16, 2013—8 findings
- Jul 13, 2012—4 findings
- Dec 28, 2011—1 finding
- Jul 14, 2011—4 findings
- Apr 20, 2011—2 findings
- Sep 14, 2010—5 findings · 2 harm
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction