Oaks of Brecksville
Brecksville, Ohio · CCN 366395
14 surveys since 2014, 4 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 26
- Surveys
- 14
- Harm or worse
- 4
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 80
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- SABER HEALTHCARE GROUP
- County
- Cuyahoga
- Medicare-certified since
- 2011
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 4
- Health inspection
- 4
- Staffing
- 2
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=11, floor 20).
Last survey on record
Jul 1, 2025
496 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.76 | 3.47 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.62 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 51.2% | 49.2% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G222.2% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D333.3% | E333.3% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B111.1% | C— |
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Oaks of Brecksville, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF684Jul 1, 2025
THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on closed medical record review, review of hospital discharge paperwork, facility policy review and interview, the facility failed to ensure wound care orders were transcribed and implemented per physician's orders to promote healing and prevent infection for a surgical wound Resident #81 had upon admission to the facility. Actual Harm occurred on 05/26/25 when staff identified Resident #81 had not been provided wound care treatments to a surgical wound to the resident's back resulting in the infection. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Jul 27, 2023
THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on closed record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #70 was properly secured in the facility transportation van to prevent a fall with injury during transport. Actual harm occurred on 04/20/23 when Resident #70 sustained a head trauma/forehead laceration that required hospitalization and multiple stitches/sutures, after being thrown forward and coming into contact with a metal object while being transported to dialysis in the facility transport van. This affected one resident (#70) of three residents reviewed for falls and safe transport. The facility census was 69. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Oct 15, 2021
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide Resident #64 proper assistance with toileting. Actual harm occurred on 10/06/21 at 1:45 P.M. when Resident #64, who required extensive two person assistance with toileting assistance, was taken off a bed pan by one state tested nursing assistant (STNA) rather than two STNAs. Resident #64 slid to the ground resulting in a fractured femur. This affected one resident (Resident #64) of three residents reviewed for falls. Findings include: Resident #64 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of muscle weakness, difficulty walking, arthritis, sciatica, chronic embolism and [CONDITION(S)] of other specified deep vein of bilateral lower extremity, and obesity. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF602Jul 1, 2025
THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on interview, review of self-reported incidents (SRI), review of facility incident log, review of a local police report, review of Board of Nursing (BON) records, review of Board of Pharmacy records, and review of facility investigations, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from misappropriation. This affected five residents (#11, #29, #37, #41, and #85) out of five residents reviewed for potential misappropriation. The facility census was 75. Findings include: Review of the facility's incident log for February 2025 revealed there had been possible controlled medication misappropriation for Residents #11, #29, #37, #41, and #85. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF761Jan 23, 2025
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure insulin multi-dose syringe pens were labeled appropriately with resident identifiers and open dates, and failed to ensure medications were properly stored and secured. These findings affected five (Resident #13, #26, #46, #49, and #50) of eight residents reviewed for medication storage and administration. The total census was 74. Findings include: 1. Observation of Registered Nurse (RN) #533 on 01/21/25 at 8:49 A.M. […]
Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 26 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jul 1, 2025Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
- Jan 23, 2025Standard3 findings
- Aug 26, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Dec 21, 2023Standard2 findings
- Jul 27, 2023Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Oct 15, 2021Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Aug 31, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Jan 24, 2019Standard1 finding
Show the 6 earlier surveys
- Mar 1, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Dec 1, 2017Standard3 findings
- Sep 14, 2016Complaint1 finding
- Sep 1, 2016Standard5 findings · 1 harm
- Dec 23, 2015Complaint2 findings
- Mar 27, 2014Standard2 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction