Deficiency Index

Oakland Healthcare & Wellness Center

Oakland, California · CCN 055215

41 surveys since 2011, 5 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
106
Surveys
41
Harm or worse
5
Immediate jeopardy
1
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy1

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file36/41

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
98
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
SOL HEALTHCARE
County
Alameda
Medicare-certified since
1967

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
4
Staffing
3
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded fewer weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 423 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in California.

Last survey on record

Jan 15, 2026

298 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.164.16
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.67—

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD1970.4%E829.6%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 27 of the 106 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F8123×

    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

  • F6882×

    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.

  • F6892×

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

  • F5501×

    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.

  • F5841×

    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Oakland Healthcare & Wellness Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF624Apr 19, 2022

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) had a safe and orderly discharge from the facility when the facility failed to provide and document the orientation and preparations for Resident 1's discharge needs to a legally responsible party, before discharging Resident 1. The attending physician had determined Resident 1 did not have capacity to make healthcare decisions due to dementia (a chronic or persistent disorder of the mental processes caused by brain disease or injury and marked by memory disorders, personality changes, and impaired reasoning), and required a responsible party to make healthcare decisions. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF688Jan 15, 2026

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide preventive treatment and services to maintain and improve range of motion (ROM is one aspect of exercise important for increasing or maintaining joint function) for three of four sampled residents (Residents 6, 75, and 26).This failure had the potential to result in further decline in Residents 6, 75, and 26's ROM. 1.A review of Resident 6's admission record (AR), undated, indicated Resident 6 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hemiplegia (paralysis affecting one side of the body, often the face arm, leg, usually from brain or spinal cord injury), diabetes, and repeated falls. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Jan 15, 2026

    Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for safety when: Kitchen staff had uncovered facial hair while in the kitchen.Beyond use by date food items were stored in the kitchen refrigerator.Unlabeled, undated and expired food items were stored in the resident refrigerator. These failures had the potential for contamination of food resulting in food borne illness for the 97 residents who lived at the facility. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF584Jul 25, 2024

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure maintenance services to maintain a comfortable, sanitary, and homelike environment when: 1. For Resident 39, room had a missing window covering. 2. For Resident 41, bathroom sink hot water knob was not in good working condition. 3. For Resident 58, room window could not be closed completely. 4. Multiple rooms (Rooms 5, 6, 10, 11,1 2, 16, and 19) had unclean and unpleasant bathroom environments. These failures to ensure a homelike environment had the potential to decrease residents' quality of life, comfort, and well-being. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 39's Admission Record printed on 7/24/24, indicated Resident 39 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF645Jul 25, 2024

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure four (Resident 32, 47, 57 and 67) of five sampled resident's Pre-Admission Screening Resident Review (PASRR) was referred to the appropriate state mental authority for evaluation and determination when; 1. Facility did not resubmit a new Level 1 PASRR screening for Residents 32, 47, 67 that remained in the facility longer than 30 days. 2. Facility did not refer Resident 57 for level 2 PASRR evaluation. These failures had the potential to prevent residents from receiving appropriate required mental health services. Findings: 1. […]

Read 25 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 25 of 106 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jan 15, 2026Standard6 findings
  • Dec 3, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 27, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 25, 2024Standard10 findings
  • Apr 14, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 27, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 15, 2023Complaint2 findings
  • Jan 18, 2023Complaint2 findings
Show the 33 earlier surveys
  • Apr 22, 2022Standard9 findings
  • Apr 19, 2022Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • Mar 16, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • May 6, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 15, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Oct 1, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 15, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 25, 2019Standard5 findings
  • Dec 26, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • May 9, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • May 3, 2018Standard2 findings
  • Sep 25, 2017Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
  • Apr 27, 2017Standard3 findings
  • Apr 20, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 16, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 8, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 18, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 28, 2016Standard7 findings
  • Feb 26, 2016Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • May 11, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 13, 2015Standard6 findings
  • Feb 6, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 14, 2014Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 11, 2014Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 7, 2014—6 findings
  • Jul 23, 2013—1 finding
  • Apr 12, 2013—1 finding
  • Mar 5, 2013—1 finding · 1 harm
  • Nov 30, 2012—8 findings
  • Jul 13, 2012—1 finding
  • Jun 5, 2012—1 finding
  • Jan 26, 2012—1 finding
  • Sep 2, 2011—10 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction