Deficiency Index

Oak Hills Living Center

Jones, Oklahoma · CCN 375117

52 surveys since 2010, 34 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
292
Surveys
52
Harm or worse
34
Immediate jeopardy
19
The record, 2010–2026
’10’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy19

Findings at the most serious level CMS records. 2 of these were recorded as past non-compliance — corrected before the survey.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file39/52

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
160
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
Independent
County
Oklahoma
Medicare-certified since
1992

CMS ratings

Overall
1
Health inspection
1
Staffing
2
Quality measures
1

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 41 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in Oklahoma.

Last survey on record

Dec 3, 2025

341 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.673.58
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.22—
Annual nurse turnover82.8%56.8%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$137,412 across 3 penalties
Payment denials
2
Special focus
SFF Candidate
Abuse icon
Flagged by CMS on Care Compare

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ38.1%K—L—
Actual harmG25.4%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD2362.2%E821.6%F12.7%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 37 of the 292 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6005×

    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.

  • F8804×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

  • F5842×

    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.

  • F6022×

    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.

  • F6102×

    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Oak Hills Living Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF600Dec 3, 2025

    A past noncompliance Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was determined to exist effective 11/07/25 related to the facility's failure to provide supervision to prevent elopement.Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident requiring increased visual checks was not neglected for 1 (#1) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for neglect.LPN #1 identified 119 residents resided in the facility. The DON identified 21 residents at risk for elopement. Findings:On 11/18/25 at 5:46 a.m., window alarms were observed in all rooms on hall 500, the secured dementia unit.On 11/18/25 at 10:46 a.m., CNA #1 demonstrated a window alarm to be functioning by raising the window. […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF656Dec 3, 2025

    A past noncompliance Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was determined to exist effective 11/07/25 related to the facility's failure to provide implement interventions for a resident with a known history of elopement.Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to implement care plan interventions for 1 (#1) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for care plan interventions with a known history of elopement risk.LPN #1 identified 119 residents resided in the facility. The DON identified 21 residents at risk for elopement.Findings:A Routine Resident Checks (Rounding Policy), dated 11/07/25, read in part, It is the policy of this facility to ensure the safety, well-being and supervision of all residents through consistent, documented routine resident checks (rounds) conducted at least… […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF600Jan 21, 2025

    On 01/17/25, an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was determined to exist related to the facility's failure to ensure Resident #18 was free from abuse by not implementing company policy and procedures. This resulted in Resident #18 experiencing psychosocial harm. A nursing note, dated 12/25/24 at 9:39 a.m., read in part, [Resident #18] was observed walking down 400 hallway. [Resident #54] got mad and started ranting saying that,I will stub them because they didn't like that particular resident. The note also read, [Resident #54] pulled out a rail road track nail with the gestures of attacking [Resident #18]. […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Mar 24, 2021

    On 03/23/21 at 1:09 p.m. the Oklahoma State Department of Health (OSDH) confirmed the existence of an immediate jeopardy situation regarding supervision to prevent accident hazards related to elopement and wandering. Resident #1 was admitted to the facility to the memory care secured unit. The resident was a high risk for wandering and exhibited exit seeking behaviors, and talking about leaving the building continuously. On 03/11/21 the resident had eloped from the facility through the exit door in the secured unit and then out a wooden gate that was unlocked. The resident was located 2.5 to 3.5 miles away from the facility and was returned to the facility by the local law enforcement. At 1:12 p.m. […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Mar 23, 2021

    On 03/23/21 at 1:09 p.m. the Oklahoma State Department of Health (OSDH) confirmed the existence of an immediate jeopardy situation regarding supervision to prevent accident hazards related to elopement and wandering. Resident #1 was admitted to the facility to the memory care secured unit. The resident was a high risk for wandering and exhibited exit seeking behaviors, and talking about leaving the building continuously. On 03/11/21 the resident had eloped from the facility through the exit door in the secured unit and then out a wooden gate that was unlocked. The resident was located 2.5 to 3.5 miles away from the facility and was returned to the facility by the local law enforcement. At 1:12 p.m. […]

Read 48 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 48 of 292 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jul 29, 2026Complaint5 findings · 1 harm
  • Dec 3, 2025Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
  • Nov 26, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 18, 2025Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Mar 17, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 21, 2025Standard and complaint13 findings · 2 harm
  • Dec 5, 2024Complaint2 findings
  • Oct 31, 2024Complaint2 findings
Show the 44 earlier surveys
  • Oct 21, 2024Complaint3 findings
  • Mar 5, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 29, 2024Complaint3 findings
  • Dec 21, 2023Complaint2 findings
  • Nov 6, 2023Standard5 findings
  • Jan 13, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 6, 2022Standard and complaint1 finding
  • Sep 20, 2021Infection control4 findings
  • May 26, 2021Infection control3 findings
  • Apr 18, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 24, 2021Infection control2 findings · 1 harm
  • Mar 23, 2021Infection control2 findings · 1 harm
  • Mar 15, 2021Infection control1 finding
  • Jun 11, 2020Infection control2 findings · 2 harm
  • Mar 11, 2020Complaint4 findings
  • Feb 19, 2020Complaint14 findings · 2 harm
  • Jan 23, 2020Complaint5 findings
  • Sep 19, 2019Complaint8 findings · 2 harm
  • May 16, 2019Complaint6 findings
  • Apr 16, 2019Standard12 findings
  • Dec 27, 2018Complaint3 findings
  • Oct 11, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 26, 2018Complaint2 findings
  • Mar 6, 2018Standard15 findings
  • May 25, 2017Complaint4 findings
  • Dec 8, 2016Standard5 findings
  • Oct 1, 2015Standard11 findings · 1 harm
  • Feb 21, 2015Complaint5 findings
  • Dec 5, 2014Standard and complaint12 findings · 3 harm
  • Sep 2, 2014Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 23, 2014Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
  • Apr 2, 2014Complaint4 findings
  • Oct 11, 2013—18 findings
  • May 6, 2013—2 findings
  • Apr 6, 2013—12 findings
  • Mar 5, 2013—4 findings
  • Jan 24, 2013—4 findings · 1 harm
  • Aug 24, 2012—28 findings · 2 harm
  • Jul 5, 2012Complaint17 findings · 9 harm
  • Jun 8, 2012—1 finding
  • May 27, 2011—19 findings
  • Apr 19, 2011—7 findings
  • Mar 10, 2011—3 findings
  • Sep 15, 2010—4 findings · 3 harm

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction