Deficiency Index

Oak Grove Post Acute

Stockton, California · CCN 055201

122 surveys since 2011, 8 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
299
Surveys
122
Harm or worse
8
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse8

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file69/122

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
119
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
WINDSOR
County
San Joaquin
Medicare-certified since
1967

CMS ratings

Overall
1
Health inspection
1
Staffing
3
Quality measures
1

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 110 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in California.

Last survey on record

Jul 9, 2026

123 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.934.16
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.50—
Annual nurse turnover48.4%37.6%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$40,283 across 4 penalties
Abuse icon
Flagged by CMS on Care Compare

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG21.5%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD8965.4%E3525.7%F85.9%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C21.5%
CMS’s current file: 136 of the 299 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F68912×

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

  • F6008×

    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.

  • F8808×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

  • F6566×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

  • F5845×

    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Oak Grove Post Acute, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF600Aug 1, 2025

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide one to one supervision (a designated staff to provide constant monitoring to prevent or redirect resident from engage in harmful act) to one of three sampled residents (Resident 2, with known behavioral issues), to prevent the physical altercation between Resident 1 and Resident 2 on 6/7/25.This failure resulted in Resident 2 suffering multiple bruises and a laceration to the right side of his face and Resident 1 suffering two fractures in his left hand.Findings:Review of Resident 1's admission RECORD indicated that Resident 1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to unspecified mental disorder to known physiologic condition (a clear link between a physical condition… […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF686Jul 6, 2023

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary care and services to prevent a pressure ulcer (a localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, because of pressure, or pressure in combination with friction) from developing and/or worsening for one of two sampled residents (Resident 2) when: 1. Resident 2 developed a wound on the lower back/coccyx (tail bone) on 4/25/23, and the wound nurse was not notified per Resident 2's care planned interventions; and, 2. Licensed nurses did not monitor Resident 2's lower back/tailbone wound according to physician orders, facility policy, and per standard of nursing practice. These failures resulted in delayed identification and treatment of a pressure ulcer for Resident 2. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF600Oct 11, 2022

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide services that are necessary to avoid physical harm and pain when one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) demonstrated bruising, persistent pain in her left hip and leg, and a left hip fracture which limited her mobility and activity. This failure resulted in Resident 1 not receiving necessary nursing and medical treatment including positioning, pain management, surgical intervention and treatment for [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . Findings: A review of Resident 1's Face sheet indicated Resident 1 was admitted into the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Aug 4, 2021

    Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide monitoring and supervision to ensure safety of six residents (Resident 1, Resident 2, Resident 3, Resident 5, Resident 6, Resident 8) in a sample of 8 residents identified at risk for elopement (an act or instance when a cognitively impaired person leaves a safe area or premises unsupervised) when: 1.Resident 1 eloped and was found in a homeless shelter with altered mental status, dehydrated and with urinary tract infection ([CONDITION(S)]) 3 days later. 2. Staff failed to monitor the application and functioning of wanderguard (a monitoring device which beeps when residents go out of the building) bracelets for Resident 5, Resident 6, and Resident 8. 3. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF921Aug 13, 2026

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain one of three shower stations in good working order for a total of 105 residents when, the North shower station remained nonfunctional despite documented maintenance requests, resulting in residents being transported to other shower areas, waiting for available showers, and having showers delayed or postponed. This failure had the potential to affect residents' dignity and timely access to scheduled showers.Findings:During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/10/26 at 2:46 PM with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1, the North shower station was observed with no water coming from the shower fixture. CNA 1 stated that the North shower station had been broken for approximately three months. […]

Read 28 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 28 of 299 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Aug 21, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 13, 2026Complaint3 findings
  • Jul 9, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 22, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 9, 2026Standard and complaint20 findings
  • Mar 11, 2026Complaint2 findings
  • Mar 4, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 20, 2026Complaint1 finding
Show the 114 earlier surveys
  • Feb 11, 2026Complaint3 findings
  • Jan 16, 2026Complaint2 findings
  • Dec 12, 2025Complaint2 findings
  • Dec 8, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 3, 2025Complaint2 findings
  • Dec 2, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 26, 2025Complaint3 findings
  • Nov 20, 2025Complaint2 findings
  • Aug 21, 2025Complaint2 findings
  • Aug 15, 2025Complaint2 findings
  • Aug 1, 2025Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Jul 22, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 16, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 24, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • May 22, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • May 19, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 14, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 13, 2025Complaint2 findings
  • Feb 13, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 6, 2025Complaint2 findings
  • Dec 12, 2024Standard and complaint27 findings
  • Dec 2, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 22, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 23, 2024Complaint2 findings
  • Aug 14, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 21, 2024Complaint2 findings
  • Jul 2, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 10, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 29, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 28, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 19, 2023Complaint3 findings
  • Nov 18, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 16, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 15, 2023Complaint2 findings
  • Sep 25, 2023Complaint2 findings
  • Sep 18, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 22, 2023Complaint2 findings
  • Aug 9, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 2, 2023Complaint2 findings
  • Aug 1, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 25, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 20, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 17, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 12, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 11, 2023Complaint2 findings
  • Jul 6, 2023Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Jun 28, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 11, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 6, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 6, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 9, 2022Standard17 findings
  • Oct 11, 2022Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Sep 15, 2022Complaint2 findings
  • Aug 23, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 18, 2022Complaint3 findings
  • Aug 2, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 21, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 30, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 17, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 19, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 28, 2021Infection control2 findings
  • Aug 6, 2021Complaint2 findings
  • Aug 4, 2021Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Mar 10, 2021Infection control1 finding
  • Jan 21, 2021Infection control2 findings
  • Jul 27, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Mar 23, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 7, 2020Complaint2 findings
  • Nov 22, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 20, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 14, 2019Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Sep 17, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 5, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • May 10, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • May 3, 2019Complaint3 findings
  • Mar 13, 2019Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • Jan 25, 2019Standard12 findings
  • Jan 18, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 30, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 17, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • May 25, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • May 23, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 20, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 16, 2018Standard7 findings
  • Jan 5, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 4, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 13, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 26, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 13, 2017Complaint2 findings
  • Apr 10, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 16, 2017Complaint2 findings
  • Mar 3, 2017Standard and complaint12 findings
  • Jan 10, 2017Complaint3 findings
  • Oct 17, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 10, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 30, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 14, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 19, 2016Standard9 findings
  • Dec 9, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 29, 2015Complaint3 findings
  • Mar 16, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 13, 2015Standard3 findings
  • Jul 24, 2014Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 7, 2014Standard5 findings
  • Oct 17, 2013—2 findings
  • Sep 13, 2013—1 finding
  • Aug 17, 2013—1 finding
  • Aug 6, 2013—2 findings
  • Jul 11, 2013Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 10, 2013Complaint2 findings
  • Mar 1, 2013—9 findings
  • May 1, 2012—3 findings
  • Mar 23, 2012—15 findings · 1 harm
  • Feb 4, 2011—8 findings · 1 harm

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction