Deficiency Index

Nspire Healthcare Lauderhill

Lauderhill, Florida · CCN 105680

23 surveys since 2011, 2 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
132
Surveys
23
Harm or worse
2
Immediate jeopardy
1
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy1

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file18/23

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
109
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
CONSULATE HEALTH CARE/INDEPENDENCE LIVING CENTERS/NSPIRE HEALTHCARE/RAYDIANT HEALTH CARE
County
Broward
Medicare-certified since
1989

CMS ratings

Overall
2
Health inspection
2
Staffing
4
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 293 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in Florida.

Last survey on record

Feb 19, 2026

263 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.263.57
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.49—
Annual nurse turnover23.9%44.5%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD4293.3%E24.4%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B12.2%C—
CMS’s current file: 45 of the 132 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F8124×

    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

  • F5502×

    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.

  • F5842×

    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.

  • F6412×

    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.

  • F6562×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Nspire Healthcare Lauderhill, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, patternF689Jan 13, 2021

    Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure that it is free of hazards in the environment by failing to ensure that the water temperature in resident's bathrooms, on the 300 and 400 units, was within safe guidelines and allowable maximum water temperatures to prevent possible burns. This hazardous environment exposed the facility's residents with conditions such as decreased skin sensitivity, reduced reaction time and decreased cognition or dementia to an increased risk [MEDICAL CONDITION] by scalding. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF803Feb 19, 2026

    Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to follow the approved menu for lunch on 02/16/26. This had that potential to affect 99 of 99 residents that would have been served from the main menu; and failed to follow the approved recipe for lunch on 02/18/26. This has the potential to affect 75 of 75 residents with orders for regular texture diets. The findings included:1. During an observation of lunch served in the dining room, on 02/16/26 at 12:09 PM, it was noted that the menu that was posted outside of the Dining Room documented that the residents were to be served Barbecue Chicken and the approved menu also documented that residents were to be served Barbecued Chicken, During the observation, residents were served a piece of chicken thigh that did not… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Feb 19, 2026

    Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This was observed during 2 of 2 visits conducted in the Main Kitchen. The findings included: 1. A tour of the kitchen was conducted on 02/16/26 at 8:52 AM and the following issues noted: a. Staff R, Cook, was observed with visible facial hair but no beard hair net. When asked why he had no beard net, he stated he is usually clean shaven and does not grow a beard. b. The dry storage area was observed with accumulated debris on the floor next to a reach in freezer. c. In the walk-in refrigerator, there were 22-8 ounce cartons of low-fat milk with an expiration date of 02/06/25. d. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF886Sep 16, 2021

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure outbreak testing and/or routine testing for Covid-19 was completed as required for 6 of 7 direct care staff (Staff A, Staff B, Staff C, Staff D, Staff E, and Staff F) reviewed for Covid-19 testing. Without the benefit of testing all staff and residents as required, the facility was unable to minimize risks of Covid-19 transmission to both its residents and staff and the outbreak persisted with 31 residents and staff contracting Covid since 07/08/21 as of the survey date of 09/14/21. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF887Sep 16, 2021

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to timely offer Covid-19 vaccination to 6 of 11 sampled residents (Resident# 3, 9, 10, 11, and 12) reviewed for Covid-19 vaccination and to provide required vaccine information before requesting consent for 5 of 9 sampled residents (Resident# 1, 3, 7, 9, 10) reviewed for Covid-19 vaccination. This affected residents who were not given the opportunity and information to make an informed decision about vaccination that could decrease their risk of severe illness and death from COVID-19. […]

Read 22 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 22 of 132 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Feb 19, 2026Standard11 findings
  • Apr 10, 2025Complaint2 findings
  • Sep 12, 2024Standard12 findings
  • Jul 13, 2023Standard8 findings
  • Mar 3, 2022Standard and complaint13 findings
  • Sep 16, 2021Complaint2 findings
  • Jun 3, 2021Infection control3 findings
  • Jan 13, 2021Standard5 findings · 1 harm
Show the 15 earlier surveys
  • Aug 12, 2020Complaint7 findings
  • Apr 30, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Apr 28, 2020Infection control2 findings
  • Nov 18, 2019Complaint2 findings
  • Sep 26, 2019Complaint2 findings
  • Apr 18, 2019Standard7 findings
  • Feb 23, 2018Standard11 findings
  • Jan 26, 2017Standard5 findings
  • Dec 10, 2015Standard4 findings
  • Sep 26, 2014Standard13 findings · 1 harm
  • Apr 9, 2014Complaint2 findings
  • Aug 15, 2013—5 findings
  • Jun 20, 2013—1 finding
  • Jun 21, 2012—10 findings
  • May 12, 2011—4 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction