Deficiency Index

Noble Horizons

Salisbury, Connecticut · CCN 075236

28 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2015.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
120
Surveys
28
Harm or worse
14
Immediate jeopardy
3
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy3

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file22/28

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
91
Ownership
Non profit - Corporation
Chain
Independent
County
Nw Hills · rural
Medicare-certified since
1975

CMS ratings

Overall
2
Health inspection
1
Staffing
5
Quality measures
2

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 33 facilities of 66–99 beds in Connecticut.

Last survey on record

Apr 23, 2026

200 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.744.57
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.99—
Annual nurse turnover35.5%35.1%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$151,542 across 3 penalties
Payment denials
1
Special focus
SFF Candidate

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K12.0%L—
Actual harmG47.8%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD3466.7%E1019.6%F12.0%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C12.0%
CMS’s current file: 51 of the 120 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6896×

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

  • F8123×

    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

  • F8803×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

  • F5502×

    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.

  • F5782×

    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Noble Horizons, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, patternF880Feb 27, 2026

    Based on facility documentation review, staff interviews, and observations, the facility failed to develop and implement a water management plan to prevent, identify, and mitigate Legionella contamination in the facility water system, resulting in Immediate Jeopardy to resident health and safety. Water testing performed in June 2024 and June 2025 identified multiple locations positive for Legionella, including Legionella pneumophila serogroups 1-14, at levels requiring immediate action in a high risk healthcare setting; however, facility leadership did not recognize the significance of the results, did not implement corrective measures, and did not communicate findings to the Infection Preventionist or Medical Director. […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF806Aug 2, 2021

    Based on clinical record reviews, review of facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1) who had food allergies, the facility failed to ensure that the resident received the appropriate diet which resulted in an allergic reaction. As a result of the facility's failure, a finding of Immediate Jeopardy was identified. The findings include: Resident #1's diagnoses included diabetes, asthma, [CONDITION(S)] and dementia. The admission Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had moderately impaired cognition, required supervision with eating and was on a therapeutic diet. The Resident Care Plan dated 5/26/21 identified Resident #1 was allergic to nuts, peanuts, bananas and aspartame. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Feb 27, 2026

    Based on record review, staff interviews, and facility documentation, the facility failed to ensure Resident #27 received the level of assistance identified in the care plan to prevent accidents, when staff provided only one person's assistance during a transfer despite the resident's assessed need for two person assistance. The MDS, therapy caregiver training, and the resident's care plan all directed that two staff assist with transfers using a walker; however, on 8/17/25 NA #1 attempted to transfer the resident alone, resulting in the resident losing balance, falling, and sustaining a right clavicle fracture that required pain management, orthopedic follow up, sling immobilization, and a change to mechanical lift transfers. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Jul 9, 2024

    Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for one (1) of three (3) residents, (Resident #1), reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to ensure the resident used an assistive device while ambulating in accordance with the plan of care resulting in a fall with injury. The finding includes: Resident #1 had diagnoses that included unilateral osteoarthritis of right knee, and was status post right knee arthroplasty. Review of Resident #1's fall risk assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 was at a high risk for falls. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Apr 24, 2024

    Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for one (1) of three (3) residents, (Resident #1), reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to ensure that staff provided the resident with the required assistance while ambulating and failed to use a safety device resulting in a fall with injury. The finding includes: Resident #1 had diagnoses that included cerebral infarction (stroke), muscle weakness, abnormalities of gait and mobility. Review of Resident #1's caregiver training record dated 3/25/2024 identified Resident #1 required the assistance of two (2) staff with use of a walker and gait belt while ambulating and the use of a gait belt and walker with transfers. […]

Read 32 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 32 of 120 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Apr 23, 2026Complaint4 findings
  • Feb 27, 2026Standard19 findings · 2 harm
  • Jul 9, 2024Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Apr 24, 2024Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • Mar 21, 2024Standard22 findings
  • Jun 5, 2023Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Mar 2, 2023Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Dec 1, 2022Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
Show the 20 earlier surveys
  • Oct 20, 2021Standard3 findings · 1 harm
  • Aug 2, 2021Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Jan 10, 2021Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
  • Dec 9, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Sep 17, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • May 14, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Jun 3, 2019Standard and complaint5 findings
  • Oct 3, 2018Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Apr 2, 2018Standard7 findings
  • Apr 20, 2017Standard and complaint8 findings
  • Jul 21, 2016Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Jun 30, 2016Standard and complaint6 findings · 1 harm
  • Mar 2, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • May 7, 2015Standard and complaint6 findings · 1 harm
  • Apr 2, 2014Standard1 finding
  • Feb 26, 2014Complaint2 findings
  • Oct 16, 2013—2 findings
  • Jun 12, 2013—7 findings
  • Aug 22, 2012—3 findings
  • Jun 28, 2011—7 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction