NHC Healthcare, Smithville
Smithville, Tennessee · CCN 445116
10 surveys since 2010. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2014.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 39
- Surveys
- 10
- Harm or worse
- 4
- Immediate jeopardy
- 2
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 114
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- NATIONAL HEALTHCARE CORPORATION
- County
- De Kalb · rural
- Medicare-certified since
- 1977
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 3
- Health inspection
- 2
- Staffing
- 3
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=10, floor 20).
Last survey on record
Feb 27, 2025
620 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.82 | 3.58 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.61 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 42.2% | 48.0% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $228,511 across 1 penalty
- Payment denials
- 1
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J110.0% | K110.0% | L— |
| Actual harm | G110.0% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D770.0% | E— | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at NHC Healthcare, Smithville, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, patternF600Apr 11, 2024
Based on facility policy review, facility investigation review, medical record review, observation, and interview the facility failed to provide an environment free from abuse for 5 of 9 sampled residents (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #6, Resident #7 and Resident #8) reviewed for abuse. On [DATE] Resident #2, a vulnerable, severely cognitively impaired, ambulatory female resident wandered into Resident #1's room. Resident #1, an alert male resident with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 and an extensive psychiatric history, willfully hit Resident #2 multiple times on her head and back. On [DATE] Resident #7, a vulnerable, severely cognitively impaired, female resident in a wheelchair, bumped into Resident #1's wheelchair in the dining room. […]
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Apr 11, 2024
Based on facility policy review, medical record review, www.wunderground.com, Electrical Company invoice, observation and interview, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent an accident for 2 (Resident #5 and Resident #10) of 6 sampled residents reviewed for accidents. The facility failed to ensure adequate supervision to prevent an exit seeking, wandering, cognitively impaired resident (Resident #10) with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 9, assessed to be an elopement risk, from leaving a safe environment and exiting the facility to an unsafe environment. Resident #10 (wearing a wander guard bracelet) exited a double door connected to the door alarm/wander guard system that malfunctioned on [DATE] at an unknown time until [DATE] at 2:00 AM. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF656Apr 11, 2024
Based on facility policy review, medical record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for 2 of 17 residents sampled (Resident #5 and Resident #7) that resulted in actual harm for Resident #5. The findings include: Review of the policy titled, Documentation Guidelines, dated 6/2023 revealed, .The center will ensure an interdisciplinary and comprehensive approach to the development of the patient's care plan of care. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF644Feb 27, 2025
Based on facility policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to resubmit a Pre-Admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) to include an active mental health condition present upon admission for 1 resident (Resident #74) of 7 residents reviewed for PASRR. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, PRE-ADMISSION SCREENING AND RESIDENT REVIEW (PASRR), revised 11/2016, revealed .all centers to screen patients before admission to determine if they have Mental Illness, Intellectual or Developmental Disability or related condition .It must be determined whether this individual requires the level of services provided by a health care center or whether they need specialized treatment .Center should refer any patient for a Level II resident… […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF842Feb 27, 2025
Based on facility policy review, medical record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the medical record was accurate for 1 resident (Resident #37) of 25 residents reviewed for accurate medical records. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Introduction to Documentation For Inpatient Medical Records, dated 11/2023, revealed .It is the responsibility of each health care center to establish and maintain comprehensive records which accurately reflect all aspects of the organization .Professional Standards of Documentation .Observations .assessments/evaluations .are accurately recorded . […]
Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 39 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Feb 27, 2025Standard2 findings
- Apr 11, 2024Complaint7 findings · 3 harm
- Mar 1, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Oct 31, 2018Standard1 finding
- Oct 4, 2016Standard2 findings
- Jul 18, 2014Standard and complaint4 findings · 1 harm
- Jul 17, 2013—13 findings
- Dec 6, 2011—7 findings
Show the 2 earlier surveys
- Mar 1, 2011—1 finding
- Oct 6, 2010—1 finding
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction