Nathaniel Witherell, The
Greenwich, Connecticut · CCN 075117
28 surveys since 2010. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2015.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 133
- Surveys
- 28
- Harm or worse
- 6
- Immediate jeopardy
- 2
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 202
- Ownership
- Government - City
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Western Ct
- Medicare-certified since
- 1967
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 2
- Health inspection
- 1
- Staffing
- 5
- Quality measures
- 2
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 69 facilities with 128 or more beds in Connecticut.
Last survey on record
Jun 17, 2026
145 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.38 | 3.88 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.94 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 7.4% | 24.6% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $4,516 across 1 penalty
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G11.7% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D4575.0% | E1016.7% | F11.7% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B23.3% | C11.7% |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6896×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
- F6004×
Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
- F6094×
Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
- F5803×
Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
- F6103×
Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Nathaniel Witherell, The, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Mar 9, 2022
Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 2 of 3 residents (Resident #8 and 371) reviewed for accidents, for Resident #8 the facility failed to use the appropriate size sling during a mechanical lift transfer which resulted in the resident falling out of the sling onto the floor during a mechanical lift transfer and sustaining a [CONDITION(S)] that required 8 staples to close. For Resident #371 who was being transported in a vehicle, the facility failed to adequately secure the wheelchair the resident was seated, which resulted in the wheelchair sliding and bumping the resident's leg causing a displaced distal femur fracture. The findings include: 1. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880Jun 17, 2026
Based on observations, review of clinical records, review of facility policy, review of facility documentation, and interviews, the facility failed to review the infection prevention control program policies and procedures at least annually; the facility failed to provide documentation of infection surveillance data collection and analysis of infection trends within the facility reports that were completed on a routine basis; the facility failed to provide documentation of environmental/infection control rounds; the facility failed to ensure appropriate disinfectant solution was used when cleaning areas and surfaces within the facility consistently by the housekeeping staff; the facility failed to ensure biohazards were emptied when filled and two sampled resident (Resident #3, Resident… […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880Aug 6, 2024
Based on observations, clinical record reviews, facility documentation review, and interviews for 4 of 4 residents (Resident #11, #86, #117 and #137) reviewed for infection control, the facility failed to ensure that infection control practices related to glucometer cleaning and disinfection in between resident and the facility failed to ensure personal protective equipment (PPE) carts were available outside every resident room who required the use of PPE, evidence of infection surveillance, evidence of annual review of the Intravenous and Infection Control Policy books, evidence facility water management plan and for 1 of 3 residents evaluated for pressure ulcers (Resident #24), the facility failed to ensure staff used appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) when performing… […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF603Jun 17, 2026
Based on observations, review of clinical records, review of facility policy/procedures and interviews for 3 of 5 sampled residents (Resident #70, Resident #74 and Resident #127) reviewed for involuntary seclusion, the facility failed to ensure that nursing units not designated as secure/specialized care units allowed residents the freedom to independently exit the nursing units. The findings include: Observations on all days of the survey 6/9, 6/10, 6/15, 6/16 and 6/17/26 identified that all six nursing units in the facility were secured and required a numerical code to exit the unit. The third-floor nursing unit (capacity of 40) was identified as the secured dementia unit and had specific criteria in place for admission and care on the unit. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF755Jun 17, 2026
Based on review of facility documentation, review of facility policy/procedures and interviews for 3 of 6 medication carts reviewed for medication storage and labeling, the facility failed to ensure that controlled medications were reconciled (assurance of the medication count being correct) with each shift change, failed to ensure controlled medications were kept under double lock, and failed to implement a system for controlled substance reconciliation to ensure accurate reconciliation on controlled substances in the facility. […]
Read 25 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 25 of 133 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Aug 13, 2026Complaint2 findings
- Jun 17, 2026Standard14 findings
- Mar 2, 2026Complaint2 findings
- Jan 15, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Jul 28, 2025Complaint3 findings
- Dec 20, 2024Complaint4 findings
- Oct 2, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Aug 6, 2024Standard18 findings
Show the 20 earlier surveys
- Apr 24, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Feb 27, 2024Complaint4 findings
- Nov 9, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Aug 10, 2023Complaint2 findings
- May 17, 2023Complaint2 findings
- Mar 9, 2022Standard and complaint17 findings · 1 harm
- Dec 7, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Oct 7, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Apr 23, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Jan 23, 2020Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Aug 9, 2019Standard7 findings
- Jul 12, 2018Standard6 findings
- Jul 27, 2017Standard5 findings · 2 harm
- Sep 22, 2016Standard8 findings
- Dec 18, 2015Standard and complaint5 findings · 1 harm
- Feb 11, 2015Standard5 findings · 1 harm
- Mar 5, 2014Standard6 findings
- Feb 6, 2013—6 findings
- Jan 10, 2012—6 findings
- Oct 20, 2010—3 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction