Mount Sterling Health and Rehab Center
Mount Sterling, Illinois · CCN 145820
28 surveys since 2013, 6 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 88
- Surveys
- 28
- Harm or worse
- 6
- Immediate jeopardy
- 2
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 80
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- SUMMIT HEALTHCARE CONSULTING
- County
- Brown · rural
- Medicare-certified since
- 1995
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 1
- Health inspection
- 2
- Staffing
- 1
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded fewer weighted findings than most of its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 140 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in Illinois.
Last survey on record
Jul 13, 2026
119 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 2.86 | 3.18 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.39 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 54.2% | 45.5% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $62,846 across 2 penalties
- Abuse icon
- Flagged by CMS on Care Compare
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J14.2% | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1770.8% | E416.7% | F14.2% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C14.2% |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6842×
Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
- F6862×
Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
- F6892×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
- F7002×
Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
- F7582×
Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Mount Sterling Health and Rehab Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF600Jan 10, 2026
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to de-escalate a resident's behaviors and protect a cognitively impaired resident from staff-to-resident physical abuse for one of three (R1) residents reviewed in the sample of four. These failures resulted in a staff member (V4/Registered Nurse) kicking a resident (R1), who has a diagnosis of Dementia and known physical behaviors, three times above the left hip on 11/1/25 after R1 exhibited behaviors towards V4, which caused R1 to experience psychosocial and physical harm of fear, mental anguish, and pain.These failures resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy:While the immediacy was removed on 1/3/26, the facility remains out of compliance at a severity Level II as additional time is needed to evaluate the implementation… […]
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF626Aug 30, 2022
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to allow a resident (R1) to return to the facility after being sent to the hospital for an acute behavioral and medical condition, failed to document all measures the facility took to meet R1's needs that could not be met by the facility along with developing and implementing a care plan to meet those needs, failed to involve R1, R1's Power of Attorney (POA), and the Ombudsman to develop a plan to meet R1's needs, failed to notify the resident, resident's representative, and long term care Ombudsman in writing and verbally of R1's discharge, including notification of appeal rights, and failed to establish and follow a written policy on allowing a resident to return to the facility after hospitalization for one of three residents (R1)… […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Jul 25, 2022
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure two qualified staff were present to assist a resident with bed mobility, dressing, transfer and a gait belt was utilized according to facility policy, for one of three residents (R1) reviewed for falls, in a sample of three. These failures resulted V4 (Certified Nursing Assistant) independently dressing R1 and attempting to transfer R1 without a gait belt resulting in R1 falling to the floor sustaining an Acute Displaced Right Distal Femoral Periprosthetic Fracture. Findings include: The facility policy, titled Fall Assessment and Management Policy (revised 4/2019), documents It is the policy of this facility to assess each resident's fall risk on admission, quarterly, and with each fall. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF686May 20, 2022
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to revise pressure relief measures or change treatment orders for one of three residents (R1) reviewed for pressure ulcers in a sample of three. These failures resulted in R1 developing a stage four pressure ulcer to the coccyx with wound infection, a deep tissue injury (DTI) to the right heel and a stage three pressure ulcer to the left heel which required hospitalization . Findings include: A Wound & Ulcer Policy and Procedure dated 1/10/18 states, It is the policy of this facility to provide nursing standards for assessment, prevention, treatment, and protocols to manage residents at any level of risk for skin breakdown and for wound management. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF679Aug 25, 2025
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide activities on weekends and evenings. This failure has the potential to affect all 67 residents residing within the facility. Findings include:The Administration Code Section 300.1410 Activity Program (undated) documents a) The facility shall provide an ongoing program of activities to meet the interests and preferences and the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident, in accordance with the resident's comprehensive assessment. The activities shall be coordinated with other services and programs to make use of both community and facility resources and to benefit the residents. […]
Read 25 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 25 of 88 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jul 13, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Mar 26, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Jan 10, 2026Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
- Aug 25, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Apr 5, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Oct 5, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Feb 28, 2024Standard5 findings
- Dec 20, 2023Complaint1 finding
Show the 20 earlier surveys
- Sep 20, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Dec 15, 2022Standard8 findings
- Aug 30, 2022Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
- Jul 25, 2022Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- May 20, 2022Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Apr 16, 2022Complaint2 findings
- Oct 7, 2021Standard2 findings
- Dec 12, 2019Standard and complaint4 findings
- Nov 15, 2018Standard12 findings
- Jul 12, 2018Complaint4 findings · 1 harm
- Apr 17, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Oct 25, 2017Standard2 findings
- Dec 22, 2016Standard7 findings · 1 harm
- May 24, 2016Complaint1 finding
- Nov 5, 2015Standard8 findings
- Jul 8, 2015Complaint2 findings
- Oct 8, 2014Standard4 findings
- Dec 18, 2013—9 findings
- Feb 20, 2013—1 finding
- Jan 24, 2013—2 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction