Moosehaven
Orange Park, Florida · CCN 106077
10 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2019.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 34
- Surveys
- 10
- Harm or worse
- 1
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 72
- Ownership
- Non profit - Corporation
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Clay
- Medicare-certified since
- 2008
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 5
- Health inspection
- 5
- Staffing
- 5
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=6, floor 20).
Last survey on record
Jun 5, 2026
157 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 5.34 | 3.98 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.64 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 19.4% | 32.1% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D583.3% | E— | F116.7% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Moosehaven, in the surveyor’s own words.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF585Feb 25, 2021
Based on staff interviews and a review of the facility's policies and procedures, the facility failed to ensure its grievance policy contained all mandated requirements. All 25 residents had the potential to be affected by the omissions in the facility-wide policy. The findings include: A review of the facility's grievance policy (undated) revealed the following purpose: It is the policy of this facility to assist residents, their representatives (sponsors), other interested family members, or advocates in filing grievances or complaints when such requests are made. The form listed procedural steps one should take to file a grievance. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF656Jun 5, 2026
Based on observation, interview, record review and review of the facility's policy and procedure titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered (revised March 2022), the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, mental, and psychosocial needs and included the resident's goals, desired outcomes, and preferences for the use of psychotropic medications, for one (Resident #6) of six residents reviewed for unnecessary medication administration, from a total of 22 residents in the sample. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF695Sep 1, 2022
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who required respiratory care, was provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice and the comprehensive person-centered care plan, for one (Resident #75) of 10 residents receiving respiratory treatment, from a total of 13 residents in the sample. The findings include: On 8/29/2022 at 10:16 a.m., Resident #75 was observed asleep in bed. Her nasal cannula was lying across her chest and an oxygen concentrator was observed at bedside. The concentrator was set to administer oxygen at a rate of 4 liters per minute (LPM). During a follow-up attempt to interview the resident at 1:11 p.m. the same day, she was again observed sleeping. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF657Feb 25, 2021
Based on medical record reviews and staff interviews, the facility failed to revise resident care plans following the completion of a signed Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) order for three (Residents #80, #22 and #1) residents sampled for a review of their care plans, from a total sample of 25 residents. The findings include: 1. A review of the medical record for Resident #80, revealed a DNR order dated 10/1/2018. A review of Resident #80's hard chart revealed an admission care plan that stated the resident was a Full Code (the resident desired resuscitation in the event of respiratory/[MEDICAL CONDITION]). The hard copy admission care plan was dated 9/28/2018. A review of Resident #80's current comprehensive care plan, revealed the care plan was not revised to include the current DNR order. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF758Feb 25, 2021
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to 1) Ensure as needed (PRN) [MEDICAL CONDITION] medications ordered for greater than fourteen days included justification for extended use for one (Resident #9) of five residents reviewed, and 2) Ensure the provision of adverse consequence monitoring for two (Residents #14 and #11) of five residents reviewed for [MEDICAL CONDITION] medications, from a total of 25 residents in the sample. The findings include: 1. A review of the medical record for Resident #9 revealed he was admitted on [DATE]. He had a [DIAGNOSES REDACTED]. On 09/03/2020, a new order was written for 0.5 mg of [MEDICATION NAME] every 6 hours PRN for 90 days. On 01/02/2021, a new order for 1.0 mg of [MEDICATION NAME] every 6 hours PRN was written. […]
Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 34 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jun 5, 2026Standard1 finding
- Sep 1, 2022Standard1 finding
- Feb 25, 2021Standard4 findings
- Jul 25, 2019Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Feb 21, 2019Standard7 findings
- Sep 3, 2015Standard5 findings
- Aug 8, 2014Standard9 findings
- Jun 20, 2013—1 finding
Show the 2 earlier surveys
- Apr 11, 2012—2 findings
- May 5, 2011—3 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction