Monument Healthcare Murray Creek
Millcreek, Utah · CCN 465094
23 surveys since 2010, 10 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 192
- Surveys
- 23
- Harm or worse
- 10
- Immediate jeopardy
- 1
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 184
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- MONUMENT HEALTH GROUP
- County
- Salt Lake
- Medicare-certified since
- 1984
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 2
- Health inspection
- 1
- Staffing
- 3
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 69 for-profit facilities in Utah.
Last survey on record
Mar 31, 2026
223 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.82 | 3.59 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 1.02 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 42.2% | 54.5% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $59,188 across 3 penalties
- Abuse icon
- Flagged by CMS on Care Compare
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G24.0% | H12.0% | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D2652.0% | E1530.0% | F612.0% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6894×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
- F6563×
Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
- F6773×
Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
- F5542×
Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
- F6092×
Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Monument Healthcare Murray Creek, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, patternF600Jun 28, 2025
Based on interview, record review, document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to protect the residents' rights to be free from verbal and sexual abuse by a resident. Residents #33, #71, and #351 all reported they felt threatened and/or uncomfortable around Resident #346, a resident who was know to display sexually inappropriate behaviors. The facility further failed to protect the residents' rights to be free from physical abuse by staff. On 02/14/2025, Registered Nurse (RN) #9 willfully and intentionally yanked a walker from Resident #402, which caused the resident to fall to the floor. Resident #402 sustained a 2-inch goose egg to the forehead and bruised knees. The facility substantiated that abuse occurred and terminated the employment of RN #9. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Mar 31, 2026
Based on interview, observation, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident's environment remained free of accident hazards for one of one resident reviewed for accidents (Resident #11). Specifically, the facility failed to ensure a mechanical lift sling was in safe, functional condition, resulting in a strap breakage during a transfer. This failure caused Resident #11 to fall, resulting in a 1cm scalp laceration and severe pain (9/10).The facility's noncompliance was determined to be Past Noncompliance. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Jan 31, 2024
Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility did not ensure that 1 out of 9 sampled residents received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents. Specifically, a resident who was assessed as being a high risk for falls did not have interventions in place to prevent falls. The resident had a fall and sustained a maxillary fracture. Resident identifier: 3. Findings include: 1. Resident 3 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and again on 9/13/23 with diagnoses which included cerebral infarction, dysphagia, ataxia, nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage, type 2 diabetes mellitus, difficulty in walking, muscle weakness, need for assistance with personal care, atrial fibrillation, cognitive communication deficit, insomnia, nausea,… […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF847Jun 28, 2025
Based on interview, record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure residents and/or their representatives were afforded 30 days to revoke their signed binding arbitration agreement for 3 (Residents #62, #78, and #82) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for arbitration.The facility Binding Arbitration Agreement with a copyright date of 2024, indicated 9. Revocation: This Agreement may be revoked by the Resident by written notice mailed to the Administrator of the Facility, using certified mail with return receipt requested, within ten (10) days after the date hereof, and if not revoked shall govern all aspects of the relationship between Facility and Resident upon and after the date of the Agreement.1. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF848Jun 28, 2025
Based on interview, record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure residents and/or their representatives were afforded an arbitration venue convenient to both parties for 3 (Residents #62, #78, and #82) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for arbitration.The facility Binding Arbitration Agreement with a copyright date of 2024, revealed no evidence to indicate for the selection of an arbitration venue that was convenience to both parties.1. An admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident #62 on 05/19/2023.Resident #62's undated Binding Arbitration Agreement signed by the resident and the printed name of the Dietary Manager revealed no evidence to indicate for the selection of an arbitration venue that was convenience to both parties.2. […]
Read 27 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 27 of 192 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Mar 31, 2026Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
- Jun 28, 2025Standard and complaint14 findings · 1 harm
- Jan 31, 2024Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Aug 31, 2023Standard and complaint12 findings
- Aug 10, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Dec 6, 2021Standard and complaint21 findings
- Aug 11, 2020Complaint1 finding
- Aug 19, 2019Standard28 findings · 1 harm
Show the 15 earlier surveys
- Jun 24, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Mar 28, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Jul 19, 2018Standard9 findings
- Mar 16, 2017Standard22 findings
- Oct 26, 2016Complaint3 findings
- May 25, 2016Complaint2 findings
- Mar 24, 2016Complaint2 findings
- Mar 7, 2016Complaint3 findings
- Feb 24, 2016Complaint1 finding
- Dec 17, 2015Standard and complaint7 findings
- Oct 23, 2014Standard and complaint9 findings
- Sep 18, 2013—22 findings · 4 harm
- Feb 14, 2013—14 findings · 2 harm
- Sep 28, 2011—1 finding
- Nov 4, 2010—15 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction