Monticello Nursing & Rehab Center
Monticello, Iowa · CCN 165279
16 surveys since 2010. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2021.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 53
- Surveys
- 16
- Harm or worse
- 3
- Immediate jeopardy
- 1
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 75
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Jones
- Medicare-certified since
- 1996
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 3
- Health inspection
- 3
- Staffing
- 3
- Quality measures
- 3
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 56 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in Iowa.
Last survey on record
Jun 24, 2026
138 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.17 | 3.54 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.70 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 50.0% | 44.6% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1781.0% | E419.0% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6893×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
- F6002×
Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
- F6572×
Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
- F5501×
Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
- F5821×
Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Monticello Nursing & Rehab Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Nov 3, 2022
Based on clinical record review, observations, staff interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for one of one residents reviewed with a fall history to prevent a fall with injury to occur (Resident #14). The facility also failed to prevent two out of two cognitively impaired, wandering residents from exiting the facility unattended and unnoticed (Resident #18 and Resident # 22). This failure of supervision resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) to the health, safety, and security of the residents. The facility reported a census of 53 residents. Findings Include: 1. According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #14 shown diagnoses include Hypertension, Diabetes and [CONDITION(S)]. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF684Nov 3, 2022
Based on observation, clinical record review, policy review and staff interviews, the facility failed to appropriately provide assessment and interventions for the necessary care and services, to maintain the residents' highest practical physical well- being. Clinical record review revealed the Nursing Staff failed to do a thorough assessment and implement interventions for 2 of 2 residents reviewed (Resident #50 and #106). The facility reported a census of 53 residents. Findings Include: 1. Resident #50's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 3 indicating severe cognitive impairment. The MDS documented the resident required supervision while eating. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF684Dec 13, 2021
Based on clinical record review, hospital record review, facility policy review, Primary Care Provider interview, and staff interviews the facility failed to provide quality of care in treatment and care for 1 of 3 residents reviewed with identified pressure ulcers. Resident #1 had identified skin impairments by the facility and upon arrival to the emergency room (ER) on 12/3/21, the resident had additional open wounds identified to the right lower abdominal fold, the left upper arm, the bilateral heels, and the left hip (areas A, B, C, & D). The facility failed to complete a thorough head to toe assessment and/or implement interventions that identified the areas A, B, C, or D. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF689Nov 12, 2025
Based on observation, record review and staff and resident interviews the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent resident to resident behaviors (Resident # 2, Resident #4, Resident #6, Resident #8, Resident #9). The facility identified a census of 48 residents. Findings include:1.) The Minimum Data Set(MDS) assessment tool, dated 8/21/25, listed diagnoses for Resident #2 which included anemia, hypertension (high blood pressure), arthritis and Non-Alzheimer's Dementia, anxiety and post traumatic stress disorder. The MDS stated the resident was independent for transferring and listed the resident's Brief Interview for Mental Status(BIMS) score as 6 out of 15, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF657Nov 30, 2023
Based on clinical record review, resident and family interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide the opportunity for the resident and/or resident representative to participate in the development, review and revision of his/her Care Plan on a quarterly basis for 4 of 4 residents reviewed (Residents #16, #18, #44 and #46). The facility reported a census of 50 residents. Findings Include: 1. The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented Resident #46 had an admitted [DATE] and had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15, indicating intact cognition. The MDS indicated the resident had diagnoses that included quadriplegia, dysphagia, neurogenic bladder, anxiety disorder, depression, diabetes mellitus and asthma. […]
Read 23 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 23 of 53 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jun 24, 2026Complaint2 findings
- Mar 25, 2026Complaint2 findings
- Nov 12, 2025Complaint2 findings
- Nov 4, 2024Standard and complaint5 findings
- Nov 30, 2023Standard10 findings
- Nov 3, 2022Standard and complaint9 findings · 2 harm
- Dec 13, 2021Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Oct 25, 2021Complaint1 finding
Show the 8 earlier surveys
- Jun 24, 2021Standard and complaint2 findings
- Aug 22, 2019Standard2 findings
- May 10, 2018Standard1 finding
- Mar 2, 2017Standard and complaint3 findings
- Jan 5, 2016Complaint1 finding
- Dec 19, 2012—3 findings
- Nov 18, 2011—6 findings
- Nov 9, 2010—3 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction