Mission Palms Healthcare Center
Westminster, California · CCN 056271
25 surveys since 2011, 2 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 185
- Surveys
- 25
- Harm or worse
- 2
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 99
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- ASPEN SKILLED HEALTHCARE
- County
- Orange
- Medicare-certified since
- 1971
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 3
- Health inspection
- 2
- Staffing
- 3
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 423 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in California.
Last survey on record
May 19, 2026
174 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.12 | 4.16 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.44 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 16.3% | 37.5% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $13,923 across 1 penalty
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G12.1% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D3266.7% | E1122.9% | F12.1% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B36.3% | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F5583×
Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
- F6843×
Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
- F7613×
Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
- F8123×
Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
- F8803×
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Mission Palms Healthcare Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF600Aug 27, 2024
Based on interview, medical record review, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to protect the resident's rights to be free from the physical abuse by the facility staff for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). * Resident 1 was slapped on the face by CNA 1 and sustained a redness to the right cheek. This failure had violated the resident's rights to be free from the abuse and negatively affected the resident's psychological well-being. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Abuse Prevention Program revised on 12/1/22, showed the facility should promote an environment free from any form of resident abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, exploitation and/or mistreatment. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF761Mar 23, 2023
Based on observation, interview, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the proper administration, storage, and disposal of the medications in a safe manner as evidenced by the following: * The facility failed to ensure the medications were not left unattended. * The facility failed to ensure the discontinued medications were properly stored and disposed. * The facility failed to ensure the expired lemon glycerin swab sticks and used sterile wound dressing supplies were disposed from the treatment cart. These failures had the potential to cause unsafe handling and storage of the residents' medications. Findings: 1. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF552Apr 24, 2026
Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure five of five final sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Residents 2, 4, 11, 75, and 95) and one final sampled resident (Resident 13) reviewed for informed consents were provided the right to self-determination regarding the use of psychotropic medications and treatments. * The facility failed to ensure the informed consents for the quetiapine (antipsychotic) and mirtazapine (antidepressant) medications included the indication of use and manifested behavior for Resident 2. * The facility failed to ensure the informed consent for the quetiapine medication included the indication for the use and manifested behavior for Resident 4. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF695Apr 24, 2026
Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the respiratory care and services were provided in accordance with the professional standards for two of three final sampled residents (Residents 57 and 83) reviewed for respiratory care. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 57's nasal cannula was placed properly positioned and the oxygen concentrator was functioning properly. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 83's Yankauer suction tubing was labeled. These failures had the potential to result in the residents not receiving appropriate respiratory care and increased risks of the infection.Findings: 1. Medical record review for Resident 83 was initiated on 4/21/26. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF757Apr 24, 2026
Based on interview and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents were free from unnecessary medications for one of five sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident 11) and two of 19 final sampled residents (Residents 13 and 57). * The facility failed to ensure Resident 57's heart rate was monitored prior to administering the amlodipine (blood pressure medication) and lisinopril (blood pressure medication), as prescribed by the physician. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 13's heart rate was monitored prior to administering the diltiazem (blood pressure medication) and hydralazine (blood pressure medication), as prescribed by the physician. […]
Read 22 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 22 of 185 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- May 19, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Apr 24, 2026Standard20 findings
- Mar 19, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Feb 7, 2025Standard13 findings
- Aug 27, 2024Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Jan 24, 2024Complaint2 findings
- Mar 23, 2023Standard10 findings
- Sep 14, 2022Complaint1 finding
Show the 17 earlier surveys
- Oct 5, 2021Complaint2 findings
- Dec 24, 2020Complaint1 finding
- Dec 6, 2019Standard12 findings
- Aug 8, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Dec 18, 2018Standard6 findings
- Feb 20, 2018Standard13 findings
- Nov 1, 2017Complaint1 finding
- Mar 24, 2017Standard14 findings
- Dec 9, 2016Complaint1 finding
- Apr 15, 2016Standard15 findings
- Apr 20, 2015Standard11 findings
- Mar 28, 2014Standard9 findings
- May 14, 2013—1 finding · 1 harm
- Mar 12, 2013—2 findings
- Feb 6, 2013—18 findings
- Apr 25, 2012—13 findings
- Jan 20, 2011—16 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction