Deficiency Index

Mission Nursing and Rehabilitation Center

Mission, Texas · CCN 455761

37 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2021.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
164
Surveys
37
Harm or worse
2
Immediate jeopardy
1
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy1

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file29/37

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
170
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
HMG HEALTHCARE
County
Hidalgo
Medicare-certified since
1988

CMS ratings

Overall
4
Health inspection
4
Staffing
2
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded fewer weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 209 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in Texas.

Last survey on record

Apr 2, 2026

221 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.423.26
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.44—
Annual nurse turnover33.3%55.3%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$8,190 across 1 penalty

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG14.2%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD2187.5%E14.2%F14.2%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 24 of the 164 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F7613×

    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.

  • F8803×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

  • F6562×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

  • F6952×

    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.

  • F7552×

    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Mission Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Dec 20, 2021

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that each resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for one of seven residents (Resident#1) reviewed for accidents and supervision; CNA A and NA B removed Resident #1's floor mat that was placed next to the bed as an intervention for falls. CNA A and NA B left Resident #1's room. Resident #1 suffered a fall that resulted in a right nose fracture, C#2 and C#3 fractures, laceration to her forehead and two-day hospitalization . This failure resulted in an identification of an Immediate Jeopardy at 4:44 p.m. on 12/18/21. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Oct 6, 2023

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that each resident received adequate supervision for one resident (Resident #49) of three residents reviewed for supervision and ensured the environment remained free of accident hazards for 2 of 2 unlocked resident rooms reviewed for supervision in that. 1) The facility failed to ensure Resident #49 received supervision while in the shower. 2 ) The facility failed to ensure the two resident rooms, 323 and 324 were free of cluttered storage of equipment, furniture, boxes, walkers, wheelchairs in a secured manner. These failures could place residents at risk of being in an unsafe environment and at risk for accidents and injury. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880Oct 6, 2023

    Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection and prevention control program that included, at a minimum, a system for preventing and controlling Legionella through a program that identifies areas in the water system where Legionella can grow and spread for 1 of 1 facility. The facility failed to have a system in place for preventing and controlling Legionella through a program that identifies areas in the water system where Legionella could grow and spread. This deficient practice places the facility residents at risk for airborne infections. The findings included: Interview on 10/05/23 with the Maintenance Director at 10:10 a.m., he stated he did not know what Legionnaire's was. He stated he had been working at the facility for 2 years. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF760Apr 2, 2026

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of any significant medication errors for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #13) reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to ensure Resident #13 received the correct dose of:Amiodarone HCI oral tablet 200 mg, Apixaban oral tablet 2.5 mg, and Metoprolol Tartrate Oral Tablet 25 mg. This failure could place residents at risk of medical complications and not receiving the therapeutic effects of their medications. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF641Dec 20, 2021

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure assessments accurately reflected the status for 1 of 7 residents reviewed for assessments. (Resident #1). LVN E did not perform a fall risk assessment after Resident #1 had a fall on 08/21/21. Resident #1's 10/22/21 fall risk assessment did not reflect a fall that Resident #1 had on 08/21/21. Resident #1's Quarterly MDS completed on 10/29/21 did not reflect a fall that Resident had on 08/21/21 at facility. These failures could place residents at risk of not having individual needs met and a decreased quality of life. The findings were: Record review of Resident #1s Order Summary Record, dated 12/18/21, revealed Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old female and was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. […]

Read 21 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 21 of 164 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Apr 2, 2026Standard7 findings
  • Jan 3, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 8, 2025Standard5 findings
  • Sep 6, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • May 28, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • May 14, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 30, 2023Complaint2 findings
  • Oct 6, 2023Standard and complaint6 findings · 1 harm
Show the 29 earlier surveys
  • Oct 14, 2022Complaint3 findings
  • Jul 28, 2022Standard3 findings
  • Mar 31, 2022Infection control1 finding
  • Dec 20, 2021Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
  • May 7, 2021Standard1 finding
  • Sep 22, 2020Complaint4 findings
  • Jul 30, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Aug 2, 2019Standard2 findings
  • Jul 13, 2018Standard17 findings
  • Apr 18, 2018Complaint2 findings
  • Jun 9, 2017Standard12 findings
  • Dec 2, 2016Complaint3 findings
  • Aug 3, 2016Complaint5 findings
  • Jul 8, 2016Complaint2 findings
  • May 26, 2016Standard and complaint15 findings
  • Apr 13, 2016Complaint2 findings
  • Nov 18, 2015Complaint5 findings
  • Oct 5, 2015Complaint4 findings
  • May 15, 2015Standard9 findings
  • Mar 24, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 6, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 9, 2015Complaint2 findings
  • May 30, 2014Standard12 findings
  • May 13, 2014Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 4, 2014Complaint2 findings
  • May 23, 2013—12 findings
  • May 25, 2012—10 findings
  • Apr 30, 2012—3 findings
  • Jun 3, 2011—2 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction