Deficiency Index

Miller Nursing Home

Colquitt, Georgia · CCN 115039

13 surveys since 2010, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
37
Surveys
13
Harm or worse
0
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2010–2026
’10’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worseNone

No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file10/13

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
157
Ownership
Government - Hospital district
Chain
Independent
County
Miller · rural
Medicare-certified since
1967

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
4
Staffing
2
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=12, floor 20).

Last survey on record

May 17, 2026

176 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day5.384.70
Registered-nurse hours per resident day1.26—
Annual nurse turnover40.8%40.8%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD562.5%E337.5%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 8 of the 37 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Miller Nursing Home, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF565Feb 7, 2025

    Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled, Grievance Policy, the facility failed to ensure that six of 40 sampled residents (R) (R37, R59, R57, R62, R68 and R83) who participated in Resident Council (RC), received a response to their grievances. Specifically, the facility failed to provide a response to grievances and complaints about call lights over a six-month period. The deficient practice had the potential to negatively impact each resident's quality of life and/or dimmish feelings of self-worth for R37, R59, R57, R62, R68 and R83. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Feb 7, 2025

    Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled, Dietary Procedure Manual, the facility failed to ensure dietary areas were maintained in a sanitary manner. Specifically, food and supplements were not labeled properly, frozen meats were exposed to air, chemicals were stored with food, handwashing could not be completed without contamination of one's hands, floors were observed with built up substance, and the facility failed to use a sanitizer on kitchen surfaces. The deficient practice had the potential for transmission of food borne illness, and potential to affect 60 of 153 residents who received an oral diet served from the kitchen. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF656Aug 4, 2022

    Based on staff interviews, clinical record review, and review of the policy titled Assessments and Care Planning; Care Plans-Comprehensive, the facility failed to document adverse reactions and/or side effects as indicated in each care plan for five residents (R), R#12, R#69, R#83, R#99, and R#129) of sampled residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Assessments and Care Planning; Care Plans-Comprehensive, Revised April 2010, revealed: Policy Interpretation and Implementation #3. Each resident's comprehensive care plan is designed to: a. incorporate identified problem areas b. incorporate risk factors associated with identified problems e. reflect treatment goals, timetables and objectives in measurable outcomes g. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF550May 17, 2026

    Based on observations, family and staff interviews, record review, and review of the policy titled, Residents' Rights, the facility failed to protect and promote the rights of one of 71 sampled residents (R) (R88). This deficient practice had the potential to violate the residents' preferences and religious culture.Findings include:Interview on 05/16/2026 at 12:25 PM with Social Services DD confirmed that R88's hair was cut without prior permission. She stated that a night shift nurse cut the hair. She was not sure why the nurse cut the hair but suggested it may have been for cleanliness. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF693May 17, 2026

    Based on observations, staff interviews, record review and review of the facility's policy titled, Gastrostomy Tube Feedings, the facility failed to provide appropriate care for a gastrostomy tube (G-tube) (tube inserted into the stomach for nutrition) for one of 71 sampled residents (R) (R83). The deficient practice increased the risk of associated complications for R83.Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Gastrostomy Tube Feedings, reviewed 01/20/2023, documented Procedure: The initial gastrostomy tube is inserted in the surgical department by a physician. Position of resident. […]

Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 37 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • May 17, 2026Standard and complaint3 findings
  • Feb 7, 2025Standard and complaint5 findings
  • Aug 4, 2022Standard4 findings
  • Nov 7, 2019Standard2 findings
  • Jun 28, 2018Standard1 finding
  • Jul 13, 2017Standard1 finding
  • Dec 2, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 27, 2015Standard1 finding
Show the 5 earlier surveys
  • Feb 21, 2013—6 findings
  • Jul 19, 2012—2 findings
  • Oct 20, 2011—4 findings
  • Oct 19, 2010—1 finding
  • Apr 29, 2010—6 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction